Package: hedgewars
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: dc-qt
Version: 0.2.0.alpha-3.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gc
Package: jpoker
Version: 1.0.11-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: elementtree
Version: 1.2.6-11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.8g-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: libghc6-missingh-dev
Version: 1.0.1.0
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
while building hpodder and many others:
> Setting up libghc6-configfile-dev (1.0.4.1) ...
> Reading package info from
> "/usr/lib/haskel
Package: lcms
Version: 1.16-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
While building vips:
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
> -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -c -o dummy2.lo dummy2.cpp
>
Package: gitosis
Version: 0.2+20080319-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because g
Package: nuapplet
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> # also happens with bash
> severity 471759 serious
Bug#471759: mailutils: FTBFS with dash: ERROR: Cannot create
/build/user/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1/imap4d/testsuite/data/spool/INBOX:
Se
Package: glob2
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: qstardict
Version: 0.12.7-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: mediatomb
Version: 0.11.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput
Version: 1.0.0~rc2-14
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc
Package: libkdcraw
Version: 0.1.4-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: stellarium
Version: 0.9.1-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: sdl-stretch
Version: 0.2.3-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: bookmarkbridge
Version: 0.76-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gc
Package: xmlrpc-c
Version: 1.06.25-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: pychecker
Version: 0.8.17-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: digikam
Version: 2:0.9.3-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: ldtp
Version: 0.9.2-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: qdacco
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: djview4
Version: 4.3-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: koffice
Version: 1:1.6.3-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: fontmatrix
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4
Package: lastfm
Version: 1:1.4.2.58240.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, beca
Package: italc
Version: 1:1.0.7-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: jmagick
Version: 6.2.6-0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: speedcrunch
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.
Package: sear
Version: 0.6.3+cvs20080411-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: pybliographer
Version: 1.2.9-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gc
Package: wapiti
Version: 1.1.6-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 i
Package: qtnx
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is no
Hi!
libqt4-dev have stopped depending on zlib1g-dev as it doesn't expose any parts
of zlib to the public. As you seem to use zlib directly, the solution here is
for you to build-dep on it.
/Sune
--
How can I do for turning on a program to the secret code?
First you must send to a Ultraflat TC
Source: swfdec0.5
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for swfdec0.5.
CVE-2008-1834[0]:
| swfdec_load_object.c in Swfdec before 0.6.4 does not properly restrict
| local file access from untrusted sandboxes, which allows r
Hi!
libqt4-dev has stopped depending on zlib1g-dev, as it doesn't expose any part
of it to the public.
I don't know if you actually use parts of it or qstardict just links against
it because the build system tries to do it. If it is the latter,
removing -lz from the makefiles is the best solu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> tags 454826 + pending
Bug#454826: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Package: matwrap
Version: 0.57-10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:07:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#477031: sear: FTBFS: ../renderers/RenderSystem.h:134:
error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'auto_ptr' with no type
has caused the Debian Bug report #477031,
regarding sear: FTBFS: ../r
Package: libgmime-2.0-2a
Version: 2.2.18-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: renders package renaming due to abi changes useless
Hi,
libgmime-2.0-2 has been renamed to libgmime-2.0-2a due to abi changes
without a soname bump. Yet the libgmime-2.0-2a package has a Provides:
libgmime-2.0-2, w
Package: freepops
Version: 0.2.6-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: kxneur
Version: 0.8.0+svn20080310-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, becau
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> tags 477015 + confirmed
Bug#477015: jmagick: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat
`/build/user/jmagick-6.2.6-0/lib/libJMagick.so': No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: pychecker
> Version: 0.8.17-8
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package fa
Package: sugar-sharedstate
Version: 1~git.20071117-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.
Package: gtkgo
Version: 0.0.10-15
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Hi,
this bug is already fixed in current SVN code. Here's a patch.
greets, Leo
Index: src/url.cc
===
--- src/url.cc (revision 1714)
+++ src/url.cc (revision 1775)
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
if (only_header)
{
-curl_easy_se
On 20/04/08 at 09:03 +0200, David Bremner wrote:
>
> Dear All;
>
> I placed a potential fix at
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sketch/sketch_0.2.60-1.dsc
>
> If Lucas can verify this fixes the bug for him, then maybe Bas could could
> consider uploading to unstable? Or someth
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#477002: fixed in gitosis 0.2+20080319-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #477002,
regarding gitosis: FTBFS: No such file or directory:
'/build/user/gitosis-0.2+20080319/debian/gitosis/usr/l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 477012 patch pending
Bug#477012: hedgewars: FTBFS: make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 255
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanls
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Thanks for You bug-report, see patch.
Unknow
tags 477012 patch pending
thanls
Thanks for You bug-report, see patch.
On 17:36 Sun 20 Apr , Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
LN> Package: hedgewars
LN> Version: 0.9.2-1
LN> Severity: serious
LN> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LN> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
LN> Justification: FTBFS on i386
LN> Hi,
* Andreas Metzler [Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:32:48PM +0200]:
> Hello,
> Please provide the complete debugging output, and the contents of
> /etc/init.d/exim4 and /etc/default/exim4
Here goes.
#! /bin/sh
# /etc/init.d/exim4
#
# Written by Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
# Modified for Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13~bpo40+1
> forcemerge 476963 477043
Bug#476963: chrony_1.23-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: "I don't know the values
of the _IOC_* constants for your architecture"
Bug#477043: chrony_1.23
tags 477035 + patch
thanks
Hi!
Please find attached a patch to fix this bug. I think it adds the so
link, but please double check.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
diff -Nru --exclude changelog lcms-1.16/debian/liblcms
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 477035 + patch
Bug#477035: lcms: missing /usr/lib/liblcms.so symlink, causes many FTBFS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:23:57 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Additionaly, I've commented the 'jarbundler' target, It's a
> > macosx-specific target, and uses the lib/jarbundler-1.4.jar(not in
> > debian and useless), which makes ant unhappy if not present.
> That doesn't really work because the
On So, 20 Apr 2008, Frank Küster wrote:
> > And, Frank, the copyright is NOT auto generated, there is only *one*
> > copyright file for all packages. What you meant is the
> > debian/Licenses
> > file which we generate automatically from the liclines and th actual
> > files.
>
> Hm, I notice
tags 477015 + pending
block 477015 by 477035
thanks
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:20:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part:
> > make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/jmagick-6.2.6-0/src/magick'
> > /usr/bin/install -c -d /build/user/jmagick-6.2.6-0/debian/tmp//usr/lib/jni
> > /bin/sh /
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:43:17PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: openssl
> Version: 0.9.8g-8
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to bu
Package: exim4-daemon-light
Version: 4.69-2+b1
Followup-For: Bug #476987
Commenting out line 96 bypasses the error. Clearly the
empty arguments are causing the error.
my workaround diff of /etc/init.d/exim4f:
96c96
< ;#sjm"${COMMONOPTIONS}" "${QUEUERUNNEROPTIONS}"
"${SMTPLISTENEROPTIO
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 477015 + pending
Bug#477015: jmagick: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat
`/build/user/jmagick-6.2.6-0/lib/libJMagick.so': No such file or directory
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: pending
> block 477015 by 477035
Bug#477035: lcms: missing /usr
On dom, 2008-04-20 at 19:18 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:23:57 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > > Additionaly, I've commented the 'jarbundler' target, It's a
> > > macosx-specific target, and uses the lib/jarbundler-1.4.jar(not in
> > > debian and useless), which make
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#476730: fixed in boson 0.13-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #476730,
regarding boson: FTBFS on hppa
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: evolution-rss
Version: 0.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Usertags: implicit-pointer-conversion
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that is likely to
cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a
pointer is greater than the size of an integer, su
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.12-18
Severity: serious
Justification: unkown
yaird has started generating invalid initrds for me. This affects
all kernel versions installed on my machine. When attempting to boot,
the kernel panics with
Failed to execute /init
Kernel panic -not syncing: No init fo
On dom, 2008-04-20 at 15:23 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > So you can repackage the upstream tarball and remove those jarfiles and
> > make it DFSG-Free.
>
> I'm not sure this is really necessary, the problem is not that the
> jars are not free but that they are used by the build system. All w
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> + /sbin/start-stop-daemon --start --nicelevel 0 --quiet --exec
> /usr/sbin/exim4 --oknodo --pidfile /var/run/exim4/exim.pid -- -bd -q30m '' ''
> ''
> exim: incompatible command-line options or arguments
This seems to have been int
Package: exim4-daemon-light
Followup-For: Bug #476987
Sorry, posted to quick. The package lsb-base is the culprit.
An eval has been removed from the start_daemon routine.
This bug should be reassigned to lsb-base.
-- Package-specific info:
Exim version 4.69 #1 built 12-Apr-2008 09:26:11
Copyri
block #476987 with #477055
forwarded #476987 http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700
thanks
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:50:44PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> This is now #477055, but I'll try to find a workaround.
I have also filed this with upstream bugzilla.
Greetings
Marc
--
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block #476987 with #477055
Bug#477055: lsb-base: fix for #406059 breaks exim (#476987)
Bug#476987: exim4-daemon-light: fails to install: incompatible command-line
options or arguments
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 476987 added: 477055
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 476374 upstream
Bug#476374: Please port to new libmpcdec API
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tag 476990 upstream pending
Bug#476990: xine-lib: CVE-2008-1878 buffer overflow in nsf decoding
Tags were: security
Tags added: upstream, pe
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2007-13
Severity: serious
Hi,
this is somewhat a follow up bug for #356853, in which this issue was
discussed earlier. Since this bug contains information about half a
gazillion of different TeX packages, most of which are now settled to be
free, or removed, it's ha
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:30:05PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:43:17PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: openssl
> > Version: 0.9.8g-8
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTBFS on i386
> >
On Apr 20, 2008, at 11:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As mentioned with the initial patch, I'll upload pyg any minute
now. During testing, I noticed a missing shlibs:Depends, which
I think is warrants fixing with this upload.
The following is the updated diff for my pyg 0.9.6-4.2 NMU.
Than
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:13:42 -0430, Gerardo Curiel wrote:
> > I'm not sure this is really necessary, the problem is not that the
> > jars are not free but that they are used by the build system. All we
> > would gain is a decrease in size of the .orig.tar.gz.
> Yes, you're right, it's not necessar
Hi Josip,
> Okay, I would be happy to try and narrow it down some more - just give me
> more hints where to look... what would be next - terminfo? locales?
good news: I think I've found it. Could you please verify that this update[1]
fixes the bug?
Thanks!
Jan
[1]: http://www-pool.math.tu-ber
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> merge 476920 476921
Bug#476920: xulrunner_1.9~b5-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols fails
Bug#476921: xulrunner_1.9~b5-2(experimental/ia64/alkman): symbol changes
Merged 4
Package: xulrunner
Version: 1.9~b5-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source. This one seems to be mips
sepcific.
| Automatic build of xulrunner_1.9~b5-2 on signy by sbuild/mips 98-farm
| Build started at 20080420-1035
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#477035: fixed in lcms 1.16-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #477035,
regarding lcms: missing /usr/lib/liblcms.so symlink, causes many FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
e with gcj (jar files)
libgcj9-src - libgcj java sources for use in eclipse
Closes: 459560
Changes:
gcj-4.3 (4.3.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Update to SVN 20080420 from the gcc-4_3-branch.
* Stop building on alpha, arm and hppa. Closes: #459560.
Checksums-Sha1:
a6d9a1aabbe1976653b9
After a bit of inspection, the root of this FTBFS seems to be
dpkg-buildpackage having set LDFLAGS in the environment (even to an
empty value, mind you).
The generated Makefiles set 'LDFLAGS = -z,defs', and as LDFLAGS was
previously in the environment, this new value is exported to processes
spawn
Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> You are correct, the mailbox module has been rewritten in Python 2.5.
> They have put most of the new code into new classes, keeping the old
> classes around for backward compatiblity; but the Maildir class was
> rewritten, and the boolean value of an empty maildir has chan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 476501 serious
Bug#476501: New version of libxine1 makes the package uninstallable
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
> severity 473434 serious
Bug#473434: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput: bad versioned dependency "libxine1 (<<
1.1.12)"
Severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 470676 5.10.0-1
Bug#470676: large input data can cause s/// segfault
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 5.10.0-1, send any further explanations to Joey
Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
close 470676 5.10.0-1
tag 470676 etch
thanks
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:34:48PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> These both look like #466298: the stack blows because the regexp engine
> is recursive in the 5.8 series. From the 5.10.0 changelog:
>
> [ 27598] By: davem on
* Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-20 22:50:13 +0530]:
> tags 477035 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi!
>
> Please find attached a patch to fix this bug. I think it adds the so
> link, but please double check.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kumar
> --
> Kumar Appaiah,
> 458, Jamuna Hostel,
> Indian Institut
Package: mysql-server-5.0
Version: 5.0.51-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Given two data files, country.sql (~800 rows) and
mysql-crash.sql (a new table and a data conversion of the data in
country.sql).
Result is a mysql server crash that results in
severity 454792 important
tag 454792 - security
thanks
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 09:46:26PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:03:25PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > Package: perl
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Version: 5.8.8-7etch1
> > > Tags: security
> > >
> > > A trivial p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 454792 important
Bug#454792: double free and segfault on utf8 containing regexes
Bug#378813: utf8-related crash
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tag 454792 - security
Bug#454792: double free and segfault on utf8 containing regexes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 477020 important
Bug#477020: nuapplet: FTBFS: CMake Error: Can't find gnutls library
developpement files!
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Package: hgsvn
Version: 0.1.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
since a few days hgpullsvn (and hgimportsvn) just stops with the
following error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/hgpullsvn", line 5, in
from pkg_resources import load_
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#475926: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.40-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #475926,
regarding laptop-mode-tools: When /proc/acpi/battery is not present and auto
hibernate is on, system hibe
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Please find attached a patch to fix this bug. I think it adds the so
link, but please double check.
Uh. I missed that when changing the installation order. That mixes well with
rushing people to upload substandard patches...
Sorry, Alex!
Thanks Kumar for correcting me on t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
> tags 476994 + pending
Bug#476994: gaia: FTBFS: lib/wwfetch/wwfetch_http.c:99:104: error: macro
"curl_easy_setopt" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
There were no tags set.
Tags a
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:32:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#477012: fixed in hedgewars 0.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #477012,
regarding hedgewars: FTBFS: make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 255
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> After a bit of inspection, the root of this FTBFS seems to be
> dpkg-buildpackage having set LDFLAGS in the environment (even to an
> empty value, mind you).
Two of my packages were affected by this uglyness, too.
If you use LDFLAGS as _make_ variable to build up the linker
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll
> try to gather all the information about this particular package and
> forward the messages individually, as soon as I get a bug number.
Here's the first:
From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Unclear License of AMSLaTeX
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
* Bernd Zeimetz [Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:03:54 +0200]:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > After a bit of inspection, the root of this FTBFS seems to be
> > dpkg-buildpackage having set LDFLAGS in the environment (even to an
> > empty value, mind you).
> If you use LDFLAGS as _make_ variable to build up the l
Success! Sugar depends on librsvg2-common for its `gdk-pixbuf loader
and a GTK+ engine, allowing to load SVG images transparently inside
GTK+ applications'.
Why does sugar only recommend sugar-artwork? It seems to be rather
dependent on it.
Cheers,
Shaun
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Jonas Sm
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
