On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:13:42 -0430, Gerardo Curiel wrote: > > I'm not sure this is really necessary, the problem is not that the > > jars are not free but that they are used by the build system. All we > > would gain is a decrease in size of the .orig.tar.gz. > Yes, you're right, it's not necessary. But just in case you decide to > remove the lib/ dir, you already have the solution to the jarbundle > target issue.
True. > I'd like to see the package in main, looks like the only problem left > now is with libpdfbox-java in contrib. Me too, but libspin-java is also in contrib; and then we still have the run-time dependency on sun-java; at least the last time I checked jabref didn't run with any of the free JREs in Debian. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Paul Simon: Bridge Over Troubled Water
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
