Are you using different usernames on your local and remote system? If
not, please try it with different ones.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNS
Same problem here. Just upgraded to
3.0.24-6etch7 and my Windows machine's refuse to show several directories. Note that smbclient (//localhost/...)
does show the directories, so this is really weird. I also noticed that the info smbclient shows is all screwed up:
+(521 ~)# smbclient //localho
Package: samba
Followup-For: Bug #453050
I have the same problem here, but I only downgraded to 3.0.24-6etch5, which
solved the problem for me.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/
Package: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at
Version: 20070829-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
hi,
impress crashes when loading a document which has de-at spellcheck
enabeld because the file /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict/ooo/de_AT.aff is
missing. Normally this
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:09:18AM +0100, Klaus S. Madsen wrote:
> Package: samba
> Followup-For: Bug #453050
> I have the same problem here, but I only downgraded to 3.0.24-6etch5,
> which solved the problem for me.
That's nice to know that everyone can reproduce the bug, but that was never
in d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 453080 openoffice.org
Bug#453080: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a
document which has de-at spellcheck enabled
Warning: Unknown package 'openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at'
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6etch6
Followup-For: Bug #453050
It was reported that 3.0.24-6etch7 had a problem with too many files in
a directory, but I think that I have at least one server experiencing
this problem with 3.0.24-6etch6. This is seen when attempting to load
older roaming profil
Package: iscsitarget-source
Version: 0.4.15-4
Severity: grave
Package contains the following:
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-11-27 09:30 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-11-27 09:30 ./usr/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-11-27 09:30 ./usr/share/
drwxr-xr-x root/root
Sorry, this wasn't the right solution.
The .aff in /usr/share is already a symlink resulting in a symlink loop.
So the file is missing.
best regards,
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> close 445609 0.6.15-4
Bug#445609: exif: FTBFS: error: 'PACKAGE_BUGREPORT' undeclared (first use in
this function)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#clo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> close 429191 0.9.8-12
Bug#429191: [CVE-2007-3215] remote shell command injection in PHPMailer
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#429195: [CV
>Can someone please test with the unstable version of Samba to
>verify whether the bug is still present there, as I requested?
Tested on sid:
ii samba 3.0.27a-1
ii samba-common 3.0.27a-1
cannot be reproduced (with 5000 files in a directory, which fails with
samba_3.0.24-6etch7)
-- System Infor
hi
in addition to the directory listing problem our users here have
problems with there roaming profiles. windows maschines (2000, xp)
cannot relyably load the profiles from the server any more. i just
wanted to let people know that a downgrade to 3.0.24-6etch4 fixed the
problem for us.
mar
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453060: fixed in esniper 2.17.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 123611 pending
Bug#123611: gnokii: please separate command-line client into own package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 418318 pending
Bug#418318: Don't build a php4-speci
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 453080
Bug#453080: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a
document which has de-at spellcheck enabled
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Roland Ambrosch wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at
> Version: 20070829-3
> Severity: grave
This package does not exist at all in *ANY* Debian:
$ rmadison openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at
$
Not even in sarge.
> impress crashes whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
close 453080
thanks
Roland Ambrosch wrote:
> Sorry, this wasn't the right solution.
> The .aff in /usr/share is already a symlink resulting in a symlink loop.
>
> So the file is missing.
As I already said, in my other message the package does not exi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 452061 important
Bug#452061: Do not work at all
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.14a-3sarge9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Unfortunately this latest samba package introduced a new bug:
Whereas the last package (3.0.14a-3sarge7) did not work with
smbfs/smbmount from Linux clients, this newest one (3.0.14a-3sarge9)
introdu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 453080
Bug#453080: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a
document which has de-at spellcheck enabled
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 453080 myspell-de-at,hunspell-de-at
Bug#453080: openoffice.org-sp
reopen 453080
reassign 453080 myspell-de-at,hunspell-de-at
found 453080 20070829-1
tag 453080 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Roland Ambrosch wrote:
> thanks for your fast answers.
> I tried figuring out where I got these versions from and my apt-cacher
> tells that I have them from ftp.at.debian.org/tes
severity 452061 important
thanks
Given the last message, I think that this isn't an issue specifically
related to Audacious, but instead a general problem with DBus.
So, I'm downgrading the severity, as it seems to be one specific
problem...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.14a-3sarge9
Followup-For: Bug #453050
I'm seeing the same problem sporadically with the Sarge version of the
security fix (3.0.14a-3sarge9). This wasn't a problem with
3.0.14a-3sarge4.
Phil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> notfound 408045 1:3.4.6-2
Bug#408045: gcc-h8300-hms_1:3.4.6-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: conflicting
declarations
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1:3.4.6-2.
(By the way, this B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> severity 308370 important
Bug#308370: blogtk: App depends on having a profile called Default
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389837 serious
Bug#389837: blogtk: please (re)add depends: python-gnome2-extras again.
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Package: 9base
Version: 1:2+20071126-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of 9base_1:2+20071126-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20071127-1437
I've been talking to upstream about adopting this package, their
thoughts on this RC bug:
Forwarded Message
> From: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Helge Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Frank Reppin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I would guess the shown bug is a
Package: opal
Version: 2.2.11~dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi there,
While building opal in a pbuilder, I got:
...
make[2]: Entering directory
`/tmp/buildd/opal-2.2.11~dfsg1/samples/simple'
g++ -D_REENTRANT -Wall -g -D_DEBUG -DNDEBUG -I/usr/share/pwlib/include
-DPTRACING -I/tmp
The NMU diff for 1.0.0-3.1.
Bastian
--
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
-- Spock, "And The Children Shall Lead", stardate 5029.5
diff -u pypy-1.0.0/debian/Makefile.in pypy-1.0.0/debian/Makefile.in
--- pypy-1.0.0/debian/Makefile.in
+++ pypy-1.0.0/debian/Makefile.in
@@ -1,33
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.6-2
Severity: serious
gnupg binary is setuid root.
"ls -l /usr/bin/gpg
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 837304 2007-03-07 23:16 /usr/bin/gpg"
PROBLEMS
1) bugs in gnupg will potentially allow for rights-escalation by restricted
users
2) Setuid flag was necessary for backwards-
Subject: octplot: doesn't work at all
Package: octplot
Version: 0.4.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
octplot doesn't work at all.
1) It doesn't automatically get into octave's path, so you have to use
addpath.
2) Doing that doesn't help, because it doesn't work wi
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452850: fixed in pypy 1.0.0-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Subject: octave-plplot: doesn't work at all
Package: octave-plplot
Version: 5.8.0~RC1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
octave-plplot doesn't work at all, e.g.:
octave:1> plot([1:10])
usage: plot (y)
plot (x, y, ...)
plot (x, y, fmt, ...) plot (x, y, pr
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:06:07PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> block 428876 by 446819
> kthxbye
>
> While I have found out that the crash occurs in names_mark_index (at
> src/iname.c:341), I can't tell much more about the problem since I can't
> produce a sensible binary for debugging. If so
I can confirm this bug meetoo for 3.0.14a-3sarge9, and also for me
downgrading to 3sarge4 fix immediately the truble.
I've also some etch installation, but i'm stopped to 3.0.24-6etch5 and
i'm not so brave to upgrade. ;)
I can confirm also roaming profile troubles, but this is not a
different bug
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:14:13PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:41:58PM +0200, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> > I do not have acces to a sparc machine and I can't use the developer
> > machines since I'm no DD (yet). I build the package in a current sid
> > chroot on i386 a
make[1]: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.1~rc1/ooo-build'
| make: *** [debian/stampdir/build] Error 2
| dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
| **
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 447369 + patch
Bug#447369: irssi-plugin-icq: FTBFS: icq-protocol.c:203: error: 'PACKAGE'
undeclared (first use in this function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
tag 447369 + patch
thanks
attached is a patch to fix this ftbfs.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
From 4052e6cf6e01c94a7ab91d946685dce493f39b05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:
I am also having this problem in Samba 3.0.24-6etch6
-Rachel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Cloos wrote:
> There was no info on packages.d.o as to how long before a working
> combination would be available. And the change did break the package.
> Had the new version been delayed until the dependency was known to be
> in the tree there would have been no inconvenience
Right, ne
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#94: fixed in orpie 1.5.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6etch6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfixed 445609 0.6.15-4
Bug#445609: exif: FTBFS: error: 'PACKAGE_BUGREPORT' undeclared (first use in
this function)
Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 0.6.15-4.
> found 445609 0.6.15-4
Bug#445609: exif: FTBFS: error: 'PACKAGE_BUGREPORT' undecla
notfixed 445609 0.6.15-4
found 445609 0.6.15-4
thanks
On 27/11/07 at 10:35 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> close 445609 0.6.15-4
No, I can still see that, like mbanck. However, it's probably caused by
a timestamp issue, since
forcemerge 453050 453102
thanks
Quoting Tibor Kovacs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.14a-3sarge9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Unfortunately this latest samba package introduced a new bug:
Sigh. Please read the BTS before reporting RC is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 453050 453102
Bug#453050: samba: security updated causes directory listings to be truncated
Bug#453102: samba mount from Windows does not show all directories and files
Forcibly Merged 453050 453102.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
forcemerge 453050 453145
thanks
Quoting Christian Schoeniger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.24-6etch6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
I would recommend reading the BTS before reporting RC issues.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 453050 453145
Bug#453050: samba: security updated causes directory listings to be truncated
Bug#453145: samba: Incomplete directory listing
Bug#453102: samba mount from Windows does not show all directories and files
Forcibly Merged 453050 45
Package: rt2570-source
Version: 1.1.0+cvs20070927-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
the module rt2570 installs correctly, loads at startup.But when you try to use
it with kernel
2.6.22-3-686 it fails if ypu try to turn donw the conection i.e. ifdown eth0
ifconfig eth0
Op 27-nov-2007, om 0:50 heeft Steve Langasek het volgende geschreven:
Is there any chance that you can test whether this is also a
problem with
the 3.0.27a Samba package in unstable?
I can confirm 3.0.27a from unstable does not have this problem - I
just rebuilt 3.0.27a for stable and I'm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 453050 453150
Bug#453050: samba: security updated causes directory listings to be truncated
Bug#453150: Broken Roaming Profiles with 3.0.24-6etch6 Debian package
Bug#453102: samba mount from Windows does not show all directories and files
Bug
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:22:33PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> notfixed 445609 0.6.15-4
> found 445609 0.6.15-4
> thanks
>
> On 27/11/07 at 10:35 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> > close 445609 0.6.15-4
>
> No, I can still
forcemerge 453050 453150
thanks
Quoting Marcus Schopen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.24-6etch6
> Severity: grave
See #453050
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:39:40 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452465: pidgin: fails to build in lenny (when intltool is
0.36)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6etch6
Severity: grave
After upgrading from 3.0.24-6etch5 to 3.0.24-6etch6 users could not load
their profiles at login anymore. Errors popped out regarding problems
loading insignificant files from their profiles, such as cookies, links
to recently opened files, Jav
I'll apply your patch as soon as we have the qemu-patched bios in
debian.
--
Jan Lübbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 453035 serious
Bug#453035: gnutls cli binaries linked against both SO versions
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> tags 452963 + confirmed
Bug#452963: kvm: Don't include blobs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> forwarded 439956 https://codespeak.net/issue/py-dev/issue52
Bug#439956: codespeak-lib - segfaults on thread-unsafe fileonbjects
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 453050 453156
Bug#453050: samba: security updated causes directory listings to be truncated
Bug#453156: list of files mangled from XP (regression)
Bug#453102: samba mount from Windows does not show all directories and files
Bug#453145: samba:
Package: isdnutils
version: 1:3.9.20060704-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/
Package: ruby-gnome2
version: 0.16.0-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/ruby-g
Package: renameutils
version: 0.8.1-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -c q
Package: python-omniorb2
version: 2.6-3.3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building python-omniorb2 in pyt
Package: libpri
version: 1.4.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/libpri-1.4.1
Package: capisuite
version: 0.4.5-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/capisuite
Package: slang-slirp
version: 1.9.3.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/slang
Package: debram
version: 1.0.3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/debram-1.0.3/s
Package: llvm
version: 1.8b-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: Entering directory
> `/build/user/llvm-1.8b/l
Package: swi-prolog
version: 5.6.14-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> gcc -c -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -I.
> -I
Package: subversion
version: 1.4.4dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> svn_wc.c:21478: warning: passing argument 2
On 2007-11-26 Jan Christoph Nordholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: gnutls-bin
> Version: 2.1.6-1
> Tags: experimental
> there's a problem with gnutls-{cli,serv} in the new gnutls-bin:
> ] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/bin/gnutls-cli
> ] linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f6f000)
> ]>>>
Package: xine-lib-1.2
Version: 1.1.90hg+20071125-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of xine-lib-1.2_1.1.90hg+20071125-1 on njoerd by sbuild/sparc
98-farm
| Build started at 20071127-1849
Just wondering, are you using this package?
I was thinking about asking for removal, rather.
If you want to maintain it, go ahead. If you don't, feel free to NMU,
or I'll fix it eventually (if I don't get it removed before)
cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Package: newt
version: 0.52.2-11.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> a - newt.o
> a - button.o
> a - form.o
> a - che
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> your package failed to build from source.
this was a test-ballot to exp, yes.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 438179 serious
Bug#438179: Please provide a way to override RFC3484
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Package: gcj-4.2
version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link /build/user/gcj-4.2-4.
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:32:20 +
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> forcemerge 453050 453156
> thanks
>
> Quoting Ivan Sergio Borgonovo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: samba
> > Version: 3.0.14a-3sarge9
> >
> > 3.0.14a-3sarge4 is the last working version.
> > 3.0.14a-3sarge6 3.0.
Package: gplanarity
version: 11496-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> gcc -O2 -ffast-math `pkg-config --static --cflag
Package: icedove
version: 2.0.0.6-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> g++-4.2 -o nsLayoutStatics.o -c -fvisibility=hidde
On 2007-11-26 Jan Christoph Nordholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: gnutls-bin
> Version: 2.1.6-1
> Tags: experimental
> Hi,
> there's a problem with gnutls-{cli,serv} in the new gnutls-bin:
> ] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/bin/gnutls-cli
> ] linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f6f000)
> ]
Package: bug-buddy
version: 2.20.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> gnome-breakpad.cc:66: warning: unused variab
Package: scim-bridge
version: 0.4.13-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> mv -f .deps/im_scim_bridge_la-scim-bridge-clien
Package: apt-rpm
version: 0.5.15lorg3.2-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by pack
Package: derivations
version: 0.5.20071110-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by p
Package: apt-rpm
version: 0.5.15lorg3.2-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by pack
Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2007, 08:18 -0700 schrieb Wesley J. Landaker:
> Subject: octplot: doesn't work at all
> Package: octplot
> Version: 0.4.0-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> octplot doesn't work at all.
>
> 1) It doesn't automatically get into octave's path,
Package: miro
Severity: serious
[...]
Package config error:
pkg-config --list-all outputted the following error:
Package 'libdebian-installer-extra' has no Description: field
make: *** [python-build-stamp-2.4] Error 1
I suppose libdebian-installer4-dev needs to get that Description field? Or
ot
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:35:15PM +, Michael Banck wrote:
> Just wondering, are you using this package?
>
> I was thinking about asking for removal, rather.
>
> If you want to maintain it, go ahead. If you don't, feel free to NMU,
> or I'll fix it eventually (if I don't get it removed befor
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452374: fixed in gnome-orca 2.20.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Hi,
I have prepared a proposed new version of libxml-sax-perl, closing
all the open bugs including these two RC ones (#430118 and #452872).
I just pushed the packaging into the pkg-perl Alioth repository at
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-perl/trunk/libxml-sax-perl
The full changelog can be seen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> forcemerge 438995 445644
Bug#438995: kvm-source: needs CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G in kernel
Bug#445644: kvm-source: Module installation failed
Forcibly Merged 438995 445644.
>
End of message
Package: gdebi
Version: 0.3.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gdebi can not be executed, if i try to run it in a console, it reports
this to me:
~$ sudo gdebi
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/gdebi", line 66, in ?
parser.print_help()
File "/usr/li
Package: genext2fs
version: 1.4.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> PASSED
> Testing with file of size 12288
> PASSE
Package: binutils-m68hc1x
version: 1:2.18-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/b
Package: swig1.3
version: 1.3.33-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> # quilt ex
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
