James Cloos wrote: > There was no info on packages.d.o as to how long before a working > combination would be available. And the change did break the package. > Had the new version been delayed until the dependency was known to be > in the tree there would have been no inconvenience....
Right, next time, I'll ask my sponsor about delayed upload. > I hope my terseness didn't sound impolite; it certainly wan't meant > to be. My deb boxen are remote and I was writing across a rather low- > bandwidth ssh link. Sorry if I was rude too. I hope that my sponsor will upload soon. He said he would today, but I guess he was overloaded with qa work. I hope it will be in NEW as soon as tomorrow. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
