Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> package liblircclient0 liblircclient-dev lirc lirc-modules-source lirc-svga
> lirc-x
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lirc-modules-source lirc-x lirc
liblircclient-dev liblircclient0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 427635 important
Bug#427635: xawtv: noise on the screen makes system unusable
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:33:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#437530: fixed in lirc 0.8.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 08:00:01PM +0200, Albert Dengg wrote:
> Package: xt
> Version: 0.9.1-8+b1
> Severity: grave
> File: /usr/bin/xtraceroute
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> xtraceroute looks for /usr/sbin/traceroute instead of
> /usr/bin/traceroute, which makes it unusable withou
Package: artwiz-cursor
Followup-For: Bug #432009
This problem is caused by the fact that xcursor-themes is not yet installed.
This package should be made to depend on xcursor-themes.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 's
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436308: fixed in am-utils 6.1.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Is there any progress on this bug? Is has been almost a month and,
at least to me as an outsider, the fix in the form of the patch from
July 18th seems to be doing the trick and to be rather trivial to
implement.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:55:31 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vulnerable code not present anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:33:58AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Please use the BTS "fixed" tag with care: it seems to override (not
> coexist with) a "done" tag for the same version.
>
> In this case the net result was that you reopened the bugreport, also
> for version 2.0.34 and newer.
What
Touko Korpela skrev:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:33:58AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Please use the BTS "fixed" tag with care: it seems to override (not
>> coexist with) a "done" tag for the same version.
>>
>> In this case the net result was that you reopened the bugreport, also
>> for vers
Package: lha
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi
There is a CVE[0] issued against lha. It also leads to a patch[1], which
apparently fixes the problem. Could you please investigate this.
The CVE text says:
lharc.c in lha does not securely create temporary files, w
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:55 +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 08:19 -0700, Keith Clifford wrote:
>
> > This is the first time these problems have been brought to my attention.
> > Unfortunately, I don't have access to the platforms that the build is
> > failing on. So, unless someone
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 428202 important
Bug#428202: subversion: FTBFS [i386]: Numerous test suite failures
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 389881 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#389881: SCSI device renaming breaks install
Changed Bug submitter from "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> submitter 225802 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225802: disk device names not pe
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427157: fixed in eggdrop 1.6.18-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376159: fixed in open21xx 0.7.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 408485
Bug#408485: RM: open21xx -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy
Bug#423350: RM: open21xx -- RoQA; orphaned, RC-buggy
Disconnected #408485 from all other report(s).
> retitle 408485 O: open21xx -- A tool suite for Analog Devices 21xx DSPs
Bug#408485
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:55 +, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Looks like it never built/worked on those platforms:
>>
>> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=open21xx
>>
>> Hopefully someone on the porter lists will be able to help (CCed).
>>
>> If n
Package: phpgroupware
Version: 0.9.16.011-2.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable/password sniffing possibility
During configuration on setup/config.php
whether are the data inserted the programa return always:
Fatal error: Cannot redeclare class datetime in
/usr/share/ph
Package: php5
Version: 5.2.0-99.etra
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Since I need a custom build of php5 (I include oracle instant client), I'm
trying to upgrade to 5.2.3 and found it impossible to do so because of a
segfault during the pear-build phase.
I tried to
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:35:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [php-maint] Bug#437631: php5: Build segfault for version
5.2.3: install-pear-installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Package: libdb4.6
Version: 4.6.18-1
Severity: serious
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=db;ver=4.6.18-4;arch=s390;stamp=1186982524
Modified test suite run started at: 04:17 08/13/07
Berkeley DB 4.6.18: (July 17, 2007)
Running environment tests (04:17:45)
Running archive tests (04:19:15)
Runn
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 13:36 +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:55 +, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> Looks like it never built/worked on those platforms:
> >>
> >> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=open21xx
> >>
> >> Hopefully
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> tags 437307 sid lenny
Bug#437307: libgamin0 claims compatibility with libfam0, but ABI differ
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid, lenny
>
End of message, stopping processing her
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 03:58:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Package: backuppc
> Version: 2.1.2-6
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
>
> The default password generated at installation time is publically
> visible to any user with local access to the system on which backuppc is
> installed as it
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435978: fixed in gst-plugins-base0.10 0.10.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Good catch. Putting the EOF in the character buffer doesn't sound like a
bright thing to do either. I'll review the whole section and get a release
to you.
Thanks for you help,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Matej Vela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:37 AM
To: M
On Monday 13 August 2007, you wrote:
> Thanks for the report ! What's strange is that the password should be in
> passwords.dat, not in config.dat... Anyway it should be cleared.
I know debconf quite well because of my work on Debian Installer and that's
only true if you ask a user to _input_ a p
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427973: fixed in nufw 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:32:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435819: fixed in shared-mime-info 0.22-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> owner 432540 !
Bug#432540: checkstyle: FTBFS: Illegal class or package name
'/usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/jre/lib/glibj.zip:/usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/tools.jar'
Owner recorded as Paul C
I sent removal request to ftp.debian.org.
It is bug#437665.
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the insight. I'll compile it both ways, signed-char and
unsigned-char to make sure everything works before I do a new release.
Cheers,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Michel Dänzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 3:41 AM
To: Paul Wise
Cc: Keith Clifford;
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 437505 libpam-runtime
Bug#437505: gnome-screensaver: Unable to unlock a locked screen
Bug reassigned from package `gnome-screensaver' to `libpam-runtime'.
> found 437505 0.99.7.1-1
Bug#437505: gnome-screensaver: Unable to unlock a locked scree
reassign 437505 libpam-runtime
found 437505 0.99.7.1-1
thanks
Looks like unix_checkpwd is no longer setuid in PAM from experimental,
which means it can no longer read /etc/shadow.
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:54:32PM +0100, Brett Parker wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the config structure when dynamic backends are
> used - the basic issue is that when the backend was loaded, it wouldn't
> (neccessarily) share the config structure with the program that called
> it (and had th
Package: open-invaders
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The attached patch on top of that mentioned in README.Debian makes
open-invaders build and run on powerpc. Note that I think the allegro
headers should define ALLEGRO_LINUX, see bug #437688, but this is
probably a proper bug of i
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:21:44 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bug report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:32:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435775: fixed in atokx 1.0-21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I had the same problem in unstable. When I did the apt-get build-dep;
apt-get source; debian/rules binary dance and rebuild the packages
playground and playground-plugin-xmms on my own machine, playground
worked. Must be a subtle difference in the build environment.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Package: wine
Version: 0.9.39-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Wine don't start and freeze the computer. Nothing works, need to reboot. If you
type in a console: regedit , appear an message saying that has no entry valid
and
freeze the machine.
-- System Inform
Randall Donald wrote:
> Well there is a patch (http://grizach.sc18.info/nvpatch/) for 2.6.21
> but I'm not sure how legal it is regarding the paravirtualization
> gpl-only problem. I have only become aware of the workaround recently
> (at least one that had an explanation) and had hoped 2.6.22 wo
severity 437423 important
thanks
Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?word=%2Fusr%2Fshare%2Fcommon-licenses%2FGPL-3&searchmode=searchfiles&case=sensitive&version=unstable&arch=i386
> says:
>
> You have searched for usr/share/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 437423 important
Bug#437423: /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3 do not exist
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 437505 libpam-modules
Bug#437505: gnome-screensaver: Unable to unlock a locked screen
Bug reassigned from package `libpam-runtime' to `libpam-modules'.
>
End of message, sto
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436107: /usr/lib/libdb-4.5.so: no version information
available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:47:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425803: fixed in texlive-base 2007-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:47:41 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436235: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:47:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435719: fixed in texlive-base 2007-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:47:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425803: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:47:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436235: fixed in texlive-base 2007-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:47:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425803: fixed in texlive-base 2007-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:47:41 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435719: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:47:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425803: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> package bzr-builddeb
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: bzr-builddeb
> tags 436089 + pending
Bug#436089: Uninstallable; should only depend on python-debian
Tags were: patch
Tags added: p
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430960: fixed in nautilus-sendto 0.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 435764 1:2.9.13-1
Bug#435764: octave2.9: Depends on removed libcurl4 instead of libcurl3(-gnutls)
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1:2.9.13-1.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432449: fixed in nautilus-sendto 0.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432449: fixed in nautilus-sendto 0.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430960: fixed in nautilus-sendto 0.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hiya
On Saturday 04 Aug 2007, Mykola Nikishov wrote:
> With this it works fine.
Thanks a lot for testing this and the suggested patch. Unfortunately I found
that the patch breaks the package database handling. (It is possible to see
this by comparing the unit tests before and after the patch.)
Package: db
Version: 4.6.18-1
Severity: serious
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=db;ver=4.6.18-4;arch=arm;stamp=1187033603
Modified test suite run started at: 09:02 08/13/07
Berkeley DB 4.6.18: (July 17, 2007)
Running environment tests (09:02:08)
Running archive tests (09:06:40)
Running bac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> package apt-proxy
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: apt-proxy
> forcemerge 436011 436112 436137
Bug#436011: apt-proxy: 'module' object has no attribute 'CPU'
Bug#436112: apt-proxy: Fail
these bugs are dupes of:
437154
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 401800 pending
Bug#401800: ITP: ecryptfs-utils -- Linux eCryptfs utilities
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 430302 pending
Bug#430302: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc
forwarded 437289 https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue822
thanks
* Falk Hueffner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: gnupg2
> Version: 2.0.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> [...]
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../gl -I../intl
> -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 437289 https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue822
Bug#437289: FTBFS(alpha): wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue822.
> thanks
Stopping processing
As I understand this, the problem exist in the mktemp() used in
src/lharc.c:932 and src/lharc.c:951. The manpage mktemp(3) says:
"Never use mktemp(). Some implementations follow 4.3BSD and replace XX by
the current process ID and a single letter, so that at most 26 different
names can be
Sorry, the problem is that the tempfile is reused. From
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236585 :
"lha doesn't open temporary files *exclusively*"
Ignore the prior message.
luciano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
69 matches
Mail list logo
