Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403997 important
Bug#403997: file conflict with clearsilver-dev
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 403997 important
thanks
Hi,
as clearsilver-dev conflicts with libcgi-dev, this bug is only
considered as important.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package wengophone
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wengophone
> severity 427930 normal
Bug#427930: wengophone: wengophon crashes when I want to add a kontact
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 427930 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#427930: weng
package wengophone
severity 427930 normal
tags 427930 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On my box I cannot reproduce this bug. Please provide more information.
Tnx
--
-
|Marco Nenciarini| Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plu
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My current opinion is to hack update-fontlang and hard-code xmltex and
> jadetex specifics into the the code, something like "if
> 10texlive-latex-base.cnf is not present, do not include xmltex and
> jadetex snippets, finished".
>
> That is a quick and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 427562 -1
Bug#427562: texlive-base-bin: Launches forkbomb on upgrade/install
Bug 427562 cloned as bug 428259.
> reassign 427562 tex-common
Bug#427562: texlive-base-bin: Launches forkbomb on upgrade/install
Bug reassigned from package `texlive-bas
clone 427562 -1
reassign 427562 tex-common
retitle -1 Possible forkbomb: mktexfmt loops because (pdf)TeX tries a base
format
severity -1 important
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> How do we continue with this bug. It seems to be the last really open RC
> bug of the texli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 425738 + pending
Bug#425738: madwifi: several DOS-able holes
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 427859 tetex-base
Bug#427859: lmodern fails to configure on upgrade, dpkg error
Bug reassigned from package `lmodern' to `tetex-base'.
> found 427859 2007-7
Bug#427859: lmodern fails to configure on upgrade, dpkg error
Bug marked as found in v
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> severity 421378 important
Bug#421378: pida: crashes at start; exception type: OSError
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
tags #420578 confirmed pending
thanks
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:24:40PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I would suggest dropping the symlink from the package instead of
> marking it as conffile.
Done in svn.
Greetings
Marc
--
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags #420578 confirmed pending
Bug#420578: exim4-config killed my email-addresses file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
This looks very familiar. It looks like memory corruption. Which
means, that just because tmw crashes when in glDeleteTextures, doesn't
necessarily mean that there is a bug in glDeleteTextures. The memory
used by it was probably corrupted several function calls earlier.
I believe this bug is indee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> package libmozillainterfaces-java libmozjs0d libmozjs0d-dbg libmozjs-dev
> libxul0d libxul0d-dbg libxul-common libxul-dev python-xpcom spidermonkey-bin
> xulrunner xulrunner-gnome-s
#> reassign 427562 tex-common
notfound 427562 2007-11
found 427562 1.0.1
found 427562 1.7
thanks
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #> reassign 427562 tex-common
> notfound 427562 2007-11
Bug#427562: texlive-base-bin: Launches forkbomb on upgrade/install
Bug marked as not found in version 2007-11.
> found 427562 1.0.1
Bug#427562: texlive-base-bin: Launches forkbomb on upgrade/insta
Hi,
I'm having the same problem.
I can additionally say that I have GRUB installed at the concerned partition
start (and not disk start)
You provided a dd command to clean out first sector (dd if=/dev/zero
of=/dev/XXX bs=512 count=1).
Can you confirm that this won't destroy GRUB install and that
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Michael Manousos wrote:
> A first attempt of asterisk-oh323 update to Asterisk 1.4 is
> available on sourceforge
> (https://sourceforge.net/projects/asterisk-oh323/). It compiles and loads
> with Asterisk 1.4.4.
> The thing is that I cannot test it since I don't have any H.323 e
Hi,
I have been bitten by this bug too. However, appart of jadetex, I've
had to desinstall xmltex as well (the symptoms were similar). After
this, I've been able to install texlive-base-bin. I've installed
jadetex and xmltex afterwards without problems.
I thought it would be worth mentioning th
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Are you sure that lmodern doesn't need a higher version of tex-common?
>
> I looked at both changelogs and couldn't see why it would. Do you have
> anything specific in mind?
No, sorry: Actually I was
Well I am under Feisty Fawn, with an upgraded version of X.org. I
have the same bug, I tried many of the binary patches and other
workaround, which where more or less successful, and I finally tried
8.37.6-1 fglrx, but it does not work for 3D :
(II) fglrx(0): driver needs X.org 7.1.x.y with
On Jun 10, Yannick Montulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You provided a dd command to clean out first sector (dd if=/dev/zero
> of=/dev/XXX bs=512 count=1).
> Can you confirm that this won't destroy GRUB install and that I'll still be
> able to boot !!!
You need to run this command on the file
Package: zope-atseng
Version: 0.3.2-3
Severity: grave
Hallo,
When trying to add a ATSchemaEditorTool to a Plone site, I get the
following error message:
Site Error
An error was encountered while publishing this resource.
IOError
Sorry, a site error occurred.
Traceback (innermost last):
Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been bitten by this bug too. However, appart of jadetex, I've
> had to desinstall xmltex as well (the symptoms were similar). After
> this, I've been able to install texlive-base-bin. I've installed
> jadetex and xmltex afterwards withou
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:17:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427079: fixed in xulrunner 1.8.1.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: file
Version: 4.21-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
| Integer overflow in the "file" program 4.20, when running on 32-bit
| systems, might allow user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code
| via a large file that triggers an overflow that bypasses an assert()
| statement. NOTE: th
Package: iceweasel
Version: 2.0.0.4-1
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-486
Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
500 unstable
> Integer overflow in the "file" program 4.20, when running on 32-bit
> systems, might allow user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code
> via a large file that triggers an overflow that bypasses an assert()
> statement. NOTE: this issue is due to an incorrect patch for
> CVE-2007-1536.
As f
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427593: fixed in timidity 2.13.2-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426669: fixed in timidity 2.13.2-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426669: fixed in timidity 2.13.2-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427593: fixed in timidity 2.13.2-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:09:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427664: exim4[9771] trap divide error rip:2b799ba4ab83
rsp:7fff0f023930 error:0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
FYI, the bad version just popped-up in testing... too bad :(
Regards,
Le mercredi 06 juin 2007 à 18:40 +0200, Stefan Hornburg a écrit :
> Luk Claes wrote:
> > Stefan Hornburg wrote:
> >> Luk Claes wrote:
> >>> tags 417053 + patch
> >>> thanks
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Attached is the diff for m
FYI, refers to NMU made for #417053
Regards,
--
Olivier BERGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ATTENTION : new address)
Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF
GET/INT at Evry (http://www.int-edu.eu/)
OpenPGP-Id: 1024D/6B829EEC
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423653: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Here's the output of `docbook2x-man --debug slony.xml' from doc/adminguide, in
case it gives any clue what's going wrong:
...
frobnitz:/tmp/buildd/slony1-1.2.9/doc/adminguide# docbook2x-man --debug
slony.xml
/usr/bin/xsltproc --nonet --debug
http://docbook2x.sourceforge.net/latest/xslt/man/docbo
* From: Roger Leigh
* Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 22:48:49 +0100
>
> Hi folks,
Hallo.
> # Unmount all filesystem under specified location
> # $1: mount base location
> do_umount_all()
> {
> "$LIBEXEC_DIR/schroot-listmounts" -m "$1" |
> while read mountloc; do
> if [ "$AUTH_VERBOSITY" = "
I've improved the package as Daniel Bauman pointed out a problem in my
changelog.
http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/stable/
Moritz, could I help you with something else?
Best wishes,
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sam Trenholme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jun 6, 2007 9:51 PM
Subject: R
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sam Trenholme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 28, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: maradns - important security upgrade #425753
To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can these be triggered remotely? Through DNS queries?
Speciall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: iceweasel
Version: 2.0.0.3-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
- --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
A few days ago Mozilla released an update for their Firefox browser.
They mainly fixed some security holes in their browser. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: icedove
Version: 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-3
Severity: critical
Tags: security
- --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
A few days ago Mozilla released an update for their Thunderbird
mailclient. I believe that icedove is still vulnerable t
Package: libgempc430
Version: 1.0.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When a Gemplus smart card reader is connected and this package is installed
libgempc430 segfaults on startup on my PowerPC based system:
#0 0x0010 in ?? ()
#1 0x0fddeee8 in IFDHCreateChannelByName
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426955: fixed in lastfm 1:1.1.3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:52:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425738: fixed in madwifi 1:0.9.2+r1842.20061207-2etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:52:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425625: fixed in freetype 2.2.1-5+etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> reassign 426676 libsndfile
Bug#426676: FLAC 1.1.4 is coming, library transition imminent
Bug reassigned from package `libsndfile1' to `libsndfile'.
> forcemerge 426676 427749
Bug#426
Package: python-matplotlib
Version: 0.87.7-0.3
Followup-For: Bug #426953
python-numpy on unstable have conflicts with python-matplotlib <= 0.90
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 427256 patch
Bug#427256: reproducible crash when searching (x86_64 only)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
tags 427256 patch
thanks
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:18:27PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:35:10PM +0200, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> >>If you single-step in gdb from the call to search_forward you should be
> >>able to see where
Hi,
I've implemented a workaround, a special case for jadetex and xmltex, in
update-fontlang. Here's a first draft for the documentation part in
TeX-on-Debian:
+
+ A special case in update-fmtutil:
+ Formats which are based on other formats
+
+Th
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427194: fixed in linphone 1.7.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Moi!
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:28:02AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I uploaded an NMU of your package.
>
> Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition.
No need to emphasize which I'd never doubt anyway...
> diff -ur dx-4.4.0~/debian/changelog dx-4.4.0/debian/change
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421482: fixed in 9base 2+20070601-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 427638 normal
Bug#427638: scribus-ng: extremely slow, to the point of being unusable
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tag 427638 = unreproducible moreinfo upstream
Bug#427638: scribus-ng: extremely slow, to the point of being unusable
T
reopen 421482
thanks
>* Temporarily remove s390 from architectures (Closes: #421482).
The package FTBFS in the same way in another 7 architectures. Also, if
you fix this bug by removing arches from the Architecture field, you'll
have to convince ftpmaster that it's not possible to port the pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 421482
Bug#421482: 9base - FTBFS: No rule to make target `getcallerpc-s390.o', needed
by `lib9.a'. Stop.
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:21:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 11:26:42AM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> Simon Waters wrote:
> >
> > I will try purging the packages as per the original poster.
>
> No joy with purge reinstall.
>
> The problem here maybe resolved, hard to be sure.
>
> I disabled all functional extensions, and re-enabled
Dear Lior,
Thank you for your message.
The problem seems to be that kpathsea provides only libkpathsea.a
but no libkpathsea.la.
Libtool should staticaly link libkpathsea.a in this case.
I have no good idea to fix it by change of VFlib.
Do you have any good idea?
Best regards,
Hirotsugu Kakuga
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 428190 grave
Bug#428190: Runtime crashes on ppc
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> forwarded 428190 http://bugs.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81852
Bug#428190: Runtime crashes on ppc
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
ht
Can you provide a full build log for this, as well as the installed
versions of your build-dependencies? I attempted to work on this
problem, but was unable to reproduce it.
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: gaim-irchelper
Version: 0.13-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Gaim has been renamed pidgin, and old gaim-irchelper is not recognized
by pidgin. Gaim-irchelper needs to be renamed and the plugin moved to
/usr/lib/pidgin, dependancies changed, etc...
--Ken
-- Syst
Package: kile
Version: 1:1.9.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: makes upgrade fail
Installing kile-i18n-de yields:
Unpacking kile-i18n-de (from .../kile-i18n-de_1%3a1.9.3-3_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kile-i18n-de_1%3a1.9.3-3_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 428340 wrong conflicts/replaces of kile-i18n-* packages
Bug#428340: Missing conflicts/replaces of kile-i18n-* packages
Changed Bug title to `wrong conflicts/replaces of kile-i18n-* packages' from
`Missing conflicts/replaces of kile-i18n-* packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
retitle 428340 wrong conflicts/replaces of kile-i18n-* packages
tags 428340 patch
thanks
(Mental note: next time, actually check the package before filing a bug report)
Ok, it's actually not a missing conflicts/replaces, but a wrong version number.
T
After a lot of experimentation, I found that I could get the docbook2x-man
command to work by calling it as
docbook2x-man --encoding=UTF-8 slony.xml
instead. The output of
xsltproc --nonet
http://docbook2x.sourceforge.net/latest/xslt/man/docbook.xsl slony.xml
does seem to have UTF-8 char
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:47:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428320: iceweasel needs some security fixes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:52:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428297: XML Pharsing Error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
69 matches
Mail list logo
