Package: sylpheed-gtk1-i18n
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0.6-3
Hi
Your package is not installable as it strictly depends on sylpheed-gtk1
(=1.0.6-3) while version 1.0.6-3+b1 is in the archive.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF
On Thu, October 5, 2006 2:07, Frans Pop said:
> I personally would prefer to consistently delay disk selection to a second
> level in _all_ cases and explain what the next step will be in the
> description; something like:
>
>
>...
> Automatic - use the largest continuous free space
> Automatic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Moshe,
it's not that serious problem.
You can solve by simply doing a:
# dpkg --force-overwrite -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1_i386.deb
That should work.
Secondly, the package apache2.2 doesn't appear because it simply does
n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 389639 + fixed
Bug#389639: bidentd: purging the package fails (update-inetd unavailable)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
'aptitude upgrade' yesterday and this morning my debian etch
is buggy. libnss/udev waiting for 2, 4, 8, 16, ... 64s and so on.
I made a CTRL-C but gdm don't start ...
So i downgrade from 251-5.2 to 25
Package: nunit2.2
Version: 2.2.0-3
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
dh_fixperms -i
dh_installdeb -i
dh_makeclilibs -i
make: dh_makeclilibs: Command not found
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 127
--
Daniel Schepler
Package: xshisen
Version: 1.51-2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
Installing the build-deps
-> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.28
2006/05/30 23:45:45 dancer Exp $
-> Considering autotools-dev
-> Trying autotools-dev
-> Considering cdbs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 391094 apache2.2-common
Bug#391094: packaging errors remove old apache2 but prevent install of apache2.2
Warning: Unknown package 'apache2.2'
Bug reassigned from package `apa
Hello
Your package is not installable as it depends on libgnustep-base1.11-dbg and
libgnustep-gui0.10-dbg which are not available in unstable anymore.
Yes, I know. It's waiting for other gnustep package updates stuck in Debian
New Queue.
Cheers
Gürkan
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386072: fixed in gnome-lokkit 0.50.22-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 389965 + patch
Bug#389965: libapache-mod-ngobjweb: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
tags 389965 + patch
thanks
Hi,
i intend to NMU this package following the 0-Day NMU Policy tomorrow. See
attached Patch.
bye,
- michael
diff -u sope-4.4rc.2/debian/changelog sope-4.4rc.2/debian/changelog
--- sope-4.4rc.2/debian/changelog
+++ sope-4.4rc.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386072: fixed in gnome-lokkit 0.50.22-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: pdbv
Version: 2.0.10.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
I just received a mail from cron that it couldn't find /usr/bin/pdbv.
Which is expected, since it's no longer installed. However, the cron.d
script does not check that.
I'd recommend adding at least a "[ -x /usr/bin/pdbv ] && " in front of
w
Package: musixtex
Version: 1:0.112.2-1
Severity: serious
Hello Roland,
There is an error when attempting to purge musixtex:
Removing musixtex ...
Purging configuration files for musixtex ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex.postrm: line 18: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file
or directory
dpkg: e
hi again,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:14:04AM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> > i intend to NMU this package following the 0-Day NMU Policy tomorrow. See
> > attached Patch.
>
> Please go ahead. Thanks for looking into this!
the package doesnt autobuild atm. This is apache's fault (#389965 the
pack
Package: debian-installer
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Yesterday I installed an opteron at work. This opteron must run in a 32 bits
environnement (binary compatibility issue). I downloaded d-i daily build
(03 oct 06) and d-i rc3 with 2.6 kernel. Once the initrd ex
Package: dazuko-source
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Every time i want to compile the module for my 2.6.18-2 kernel, i get
the following error messages:
In file included from /usr/src/modules/dazuko/dazuko_linux26_lsm.c:20:
/usr/src/modules/dazuko/dazuko
Package: mockobjects
Version: 0.09-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'mockobjects' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
junit:
[mkdir] Created dir: /srv/dbuild/tmp/mockobjects-0.09/out/j2ee/classes
BUILD FAILED
/srv/dbuild/tmp/mockobjects-0.09/build.xml:176: C
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 391146 sid
Bug#391146: Uninstallable due to unmet deps on libgnustep-base1.11-dbg and
libgnustep-gui0.10-dbg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping
Package: hlatex
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Hello Changwoo,
There is an error when attempting to purge hlatex:
Removing hlatex ...
Purging configuration files for hlatex ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/hlatex.postrm: line 7: mktexlsr: command not found
dpkg: error processing hlatex (--purge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package libinline-octave-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libinline-octave-perl
> tags 391062 + unreproducible
Bug#391062: libinline-octave-perl: Doesn't work, Inline can't find Octave
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 3
Package: ethiop
Version: 0.7-9
Severity: serious
Hello Paul,
There is an error when attempting to purge ethiop:
Purging configuration files for ethiop ...
Removing ethiop font files in /var/spool/texmf...
find: /var/spool/texmf: No such file or directory
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ethiop.postrm
Il giorno mer, 04/10/2006 alle 19.42 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson ha
scritto:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 06:43:38PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> >> * What does your /etc/rcS.d look like? In particular, do you have an
> >> S03udev
> >> symlink?
> > Yes, never touched it:
> >
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 r
package libinline-octave-perl
tags 391062 + unreproducible
severity 391062 important
thanks
I can't reproduce this. I'm downgrading the severity for the moment.
Bhaskar, can you try the examples from
/usr/share/doc/libinline-octave-perl/examples/
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUB
Package: jbibtex-base
Version: 1:2.4-1
Severity: serious
Hello Masayuki,
There is an error when attempting to purge jbibtex-base:
Removing jbibtex-base ...
Purging configuration files for jbibtex-base ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/jbibtex-base.postrm: line 22: mktexlsr: command not found
dpkg: e
Package: jspwiki
Version: 2.2.33-5
Severity: serious
When building 'jspwiki' on unstable, I get the following error:
# apt-get source jspwiki
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Need to get 2609kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://ftp2.de.debian.org sid/main jspwiki 2.2.
Package: dvipdfmx
Version: 1:20050831-3
Severity: serious
Hello Yu,
There is an error when attempting to purge dvipdfmx:
Removing dvipdfmx ...
Purging configuration files for dvipdfmx ...
dpkg: error processing dvipdfmx (--purge):
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status
g directory `/build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.18'
> make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20061005-1237
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: sgmltexi
Version: 2003.00.00-2
Severity: serious
Hello Gaetano,
There is an error when attempting to purge sgmltexi:
Removing sgmltexi ...
Purging configuration files for sgmltexi ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/sgmltexi.postrm: line 11: update-catalog: command not
found /var/lib/dpkg/inf
Package: libdtdparser-java
Version: 1.21a-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
when building 'libdtdparser-java' in a clean unstable chroot,
I get the following error:
makejar:
[jar] JARs are never empty, they contain at least a manifest file
BUILD FAILED
/libdtdparser-java-1.21a/build.xml:39: The
Package: opustex
Version: 0.84-6
Severity: serious
Hello Anthony,
There is an error when attempting to purge opustex:
Removing opustex ...
Purging configuration files for opustex ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/opustex.postrm: line 14: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file
or directory
dpkg: error pro
Package: ptex-base
Version: 1:2.4-1
Severity: serious
Hello Masayuki,
There is an error when attempting to purge ptex-base:
Removing ptex-base ...
Purging configuration files for ptex-base ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ptex-base.postrm: line 22: mktexlsr: command not found
dpkg: error processing
Package: musixtex-slurps
Version: 92a-4
Severity: serious
Hello Roland,
There is an error when attempting to purge musixtex-slurps:
Removing musixtex-slurps ...
Purging configuration files for musixtex-slurps ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex-slurps.postrm: line 23: /usr/bin/mktexlsr: No
suc
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:00:05PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
>> Sorry, I meant S03libnss-ldap. My guess is that -5.2 doesn't change the
>> symlinks on upgrade. Purging and reinstalling should fix the problem,
>> although it isn't a proper solution.
> No link there for libsnss-ldap, in fact.
A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 391029 sid
Bug#391029: libapache2-mod-php5 uninstallabe in sid due to apache2 upgrade
Tags were: sid
Bug#385480: libapache2-mod-php5 needs to be rebuilt for experimental
Tags add
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 391029 grave
Bug#391029: libapache2-mod-php5 uninstallabe in sid due to apache2 upgrade
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> severity 385480 grave
Bug#385480: libapach
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 07:22:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: wengophone
> Version: 0.99+svn4511-4+b1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of wengophone_0.99+svn4511-4+b1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390
> > 85
> [...]
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 391029 sid
Bug#391029: libapache2-mod-php5 uninstallabe in sid due to apache2 upgrade
There were no tags set.
Bug#385480: libapache2-mod-php5 needs to be rebuilt for experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 390829 important
Bug#390829: kaffeine: Kaffeine refuses to start completely
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:17:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390966: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.1-15j1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> merge 390774 391094
Bug#390774: Conflicts with apache-common: trying to overwrite
`/usr/share/man/man8/suexec.8.gz'
Bug#391094: packaging errors remove old apache2 but prevent instal
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:17:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390874: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.1-15j1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391108: fixed in drip 0.9.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # not sure why this was here
> tag 390287 - patch
Bug#390287: xawtv: Don't show any tv
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
# not sure why this was here
tag 390287 - patch
thanks
pushling provided me with another strace, of the case where xawtv was
functioning (with the symlink in place, as described above); the strace
is attached.
When comparing it to the strace of the failing xawtv, it turns out that
in the strace
Hi,
This problem seems to be solved now,
I tested on AMD64, and x86, and there is
no segfault. The program run without problems.
I think it were a problem of libasound2, it
is why the problem were unreproductible on
x86 without alsa, like it was reported by Aurélien.
I tested with jack, and the
Package: user-mode-linux
Version: 2.6.17-1um-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
user-mode-linux should be updated to build-depend on linux-source-2.6.18.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 391127 + confirmed, patch, pending
Bug#391127: mondo: Segmentation fault after selecting CDRW size
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
tags 390902 + help
tags 390902 + moreinfo
thanks
* Tom Parker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~] electricsheep
> X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
> Major opcode of failed request: 141 (XVideo)
> Minor opcode of failed request: 19 ()
> Serial n
Hi
On Oct 04, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> .58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try.
This is what I get with .58 installed:
# apt-get upgrade
[..]
35 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/46.0MB of archives.
After unpacking 824kB of additional disk space
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:32:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391138: fixed in sylpheed-claws 1.0.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tags 391127 + confirmed, patch, pending
thanks
Hi Tim,
Thanks a lot for your bug report!
I have reproduced the issue. The problem is that a text string is too
long and the code doesn't handle this properly. I have addressed this by
replacing strcpy() with strncpy() and by shortening the offendi
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:47:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389994: Found the bug, patch attached
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390902 + help
Bug#390902: Fails to start when Composite is enabled
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: help
> tags 390902 + moreinfo
Bug#390902: Fails to start when Composite is enabled
Tags were: help confirmed
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stoppin
Hello,
I tested Xawtv here, and I have the same experience:
* Sound works fine;
* Image is just noise;
* BTTV is loaded fine, other tv-app works just fine.
Also, in the documentation I read: "Don't expect you can use xawtv
without reading the documentation at least once." This is obviously not
a
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:19:51 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#391222: FTBS: build-depends on non-existing
package linux-source-2.6.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391216: fixed in musixtex-slurps 92a-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:02:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391148: fixed in sylpheed-gtk1 1.0.6-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Thank you for the detailed bug report.
What now? Is that bug in sisu-pdf or in some texlive-package or
latex-ucs-package?
At the present time I can tell you that sisu pdf generation works fine
with texlive installed (without the need to install sisu-pdf with which
there is indeed a conflict),
severity 348729 normal
thanks
Hello,
I see from the related bug reports that Anand forgot to close this
report but closed the others. Perhaps this was deliberate but by
examining the reports and the diagnosis it doesn't seem so.
So, I'm not closing this report just downgrading it. It is more tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 348729 normal
Bug#348729: strange interaction with my network settings at work
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
I am seeing this same problem, but I do not have any localization
packages installed. It is also only certain files that cause this crash
on me. Unfortunately I have not had it crash on a file I can share yet.
Most of my openoffice.org packages are still rc2-2, except for
openoffice.org-common & -
Hi,
i intend to NMU this Package following the 0-Day NMU policy in the next
days, see attached patch. Please drop me a note if you prefer to fix
this issue on yourself.
bye,
- michael
diff -u libxmms-perl-0.12/debian/changelog libxmms-perl-0.12/debian/changelog
--- libxmms-perl-0.12/debia
Hi,
> >
> > ls -1 /var/cache/apt/archives/reportbug_*.deb | /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs -d
> > apt
>
> The output is attached.
> At the end there is:
>
> Exception `XMLParserError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/xsd/xmlparser/xmlparser.rb:31
> -
> unclosed token
> Exception: XMLParserError
> Exception `Loca
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ralf, hi Norbert,
Still no answer...
>> Should we just go on and let tetex-base's and tetex-extra's postinst
>> call
>>
>> create_tetex_formats --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf
>>
>> I think that would help, too, at least with jadetex and
Thank you for the detailed bug report.
>What now? Is that bug in sisu-pdf or in some texlive-package or
>latex-ucs-package?
At the present time I can tell you that sisu pdf generation works fine
with texlive installed (without the need to install sisu-pdf with which
there is indeed a conflict),
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:57:02PM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
Dear Julien,
> Package: user-mode-linux
> Version: 2.6.17-1um-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> user-mode-linux should be updated to build-depend on linux-source-2.6.18.
>
there was just the uplo
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391179: fixed in musixtex 1:0.112.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Should be fixed by newly released xpad 2.12. Sorry for the trouble!
-mt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:48:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #390654: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing
argument?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:47:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Hi,
i intend to NMU this Package following the 0-Day NMU Policy in one of the next
days. Please drop me a note if you prefer to fix the issue on yourself.
bye,
- michael
diff -u libio-pty-perl-1.05/debian/rules libio-pty-perl-1.05/debian/rules
--- libio-pty-perl-1.05/debian/rules
+++ libi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 388231
Bug#388231: config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common,
probably ucf)
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-2
Severity: serious
Hello Debian NTP Team,
There is an error when upgrading the package from sarge to etch,
it should Replaces ntp-simple:
Preparing to replace ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-2sarge1 (using
.../ntp_1%3a4.2.2+dfsg.2-2_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacem
Hi!
On 10/5/06, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is your machine
1. on a very slow link?
I think that not. It's an ADSL 600K downstream and 120K upstream.
2. served by a very broken web proxy server ?
Only of there is a proxy between my network and the server where
reportbug is ge
On Thursday 05 October 2006 09:48, David Härdeman wrote:
> Strange, it sounds familiar...oh yes...it's what I've been suggesting
> all along [1]. So I think its safe to say that we fully agree.
:-)
> I can whip up a patch or two once I have confirmation that this is the
> final decision on this i
Package: libsvncpp-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 0.9.3-1
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on libsvn0-dev which is not
available in unstable (anymore). You might want to update the dependency to
libsvn-dev.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024
Package: python2.3
Version: 2.3.5-15
Severity: serious
Hi,
python2.3 fails to build from sources on pbuilder
[...]
mkdir debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/test
cp -p Lib/test/{{regrtest,test_support,__init__,pystone}.py,README} \
debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/test/.
: # move manpages to new
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390364: fixed in chinput 3.0.2-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388231: fixed in otrs2 2.0.4p01-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: liquidwar-server
Version: 5.6.3-2
Severity: serious
Hello Alexandre,
There is an error when upgrading the package from sarge to etch,
it should Replaces liquidwar:
Selecting previously deselected package liquidwar-server.
Unpacking liquidwar-server (from .../liquidwar-server_5.6.3-2_
Package: vdr-plugin-mp3
Severity: serious
Version: 0.9.15-1
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on mjpegtools which is not
available in unstable.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 D
Package: gaim-librvp
Severity: serious
Version: 0;9-1
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on gaim (<1:2.0) while gaim
1:2.0.0+beta3.1-4 is in unstable. As the API of gaim has changed your package
probably needs some changes to support this new version. The changes in the
API of gaim
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 391231 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-3
Bug#391231: ntp: file conflict with ntp-simple
Bug marked as not found in version 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-3.
> merge 391231 389113
Bug#389113: package ntp tries to overwrite /usr/sbin/ntpd which is in package
ntp-simple
Bug#391
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 387661 serious
Bug#387661: libuim3: should conflict with libuim0
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 385480 uninstallable in sid due to apache2 conflict
Bug#385480: libapache2-mod-php5 needs to be rebuilt for experimental
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
notfound 391205 1:20050831-3
merge 391205 388662
quit
Really sorry, I managed to report the same bug twice.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
notfound 391231 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-3
merge 391231 389113
quit
I did not see the bug was already repoted twice...
Sorry about that,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: libglib1.2-dev
Version: 1.2.10-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
upgrading libglib1.2-dev would remove some packages of my system:
# apt-get install libglib1.2-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 391205 1:20050831-3
Bug#391205: dvipdfmx: purging the package fails (mktexlsr and update-texmf
unavailable)
Bug marked as not found in version 1:20050831-3.
> merge 391205 388662
Bug#388662: dvipdfmx: purging the package fails (update-texmf u
Package: evolution
Version: 2.8.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since upgrading to version 2.8.1-1 (from the previous release in
experimental) I have seen the following message every time I try to
access my IMAP account's J
Package: libquicktime-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 1:0.9.7-0.6+b1
Hi
Your package depends on libglib-dev which is not available in unstable anymore.
You might want to depend on libglib1.2-dev or port the application to glib
2.0...
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk -
reassign 388399 tex-common
severity 388399 normal
retitle 388399 document that packages need to clean up their font cache
stop
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's actually a good idea, yes. Package maintainers have to set
>> TEXMFVAR so something inside the current directory. I
Package: gaim-extendedprefs
Severity: serious
Version: 0.5-3
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on gaim (<1:2.0) while gaim
1:2.0.0+beta3.1-4 is in unstable. As the API of gaim has changed your package
probably needs some changes to support this new version. The changes in the
API o
Package: gaim-meanwhile
Severity: serious
Version: 1.2.8-2
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on gaim (<1:2.0) while gaim
1:2.0.0+beta3.1-4 is in unstable. As the API of gaim has changed your package
probably needs some changes to support this new version. The changes in the
API of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388399 tex-common
Bug#388399: "mktexmf: line 92: mf31966.tmp: Permission denied" on alpha, mips
and mipsel
Bug reassigned from package `tetex-bin' to `tex-common'.
> severity 388399 normal
Bug#388399: "mktexmf: line 92: mf31966.tmp: Permissio
Every time I try to run gtkpod, I get errors like this:compy[1001]:~% gtkpod*** glibc detected *** malloc(): memory corruption (fast): 0x084fcb10***zsh: abort gtkpodDowngrading DOESN'T help. Not sure if this is gtkpod or something else.
Happy to provide more info if needed. Thanks!-- System In
Package: libautounit-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 0.20.1-1
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on libglib-dev which is not
available in unstable anymore. You might want to update the depends to
libglib1.2-dev or libglib2.0-dev if appropriate.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://pe
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:48:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed in version 0.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
