Bug#318531: marked as forwarded (edict-fpw: FTBFS: fpwedict: too long word)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:04:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #318531, regarding edict-fpw: FTBFS: fpwedict: too long word to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) Kazuhiko SHIOZAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. (NB:

Bug#382463: lightlab: FTBFS: build-dep on xlibmesa-glu-dev

Package: lightlab Version: 0.3-3.1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of lightlab_0.3-3.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 2006081

Bug#382445: thunderbird: Does not start at all

On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:48:37PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote: > Package: thunderbird > Version: 1.5.0.4-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > running /usr/bin/thunderbird gives no feedback; running > /usr/lib/thunderbird/thunderbird-bin states that it cannot find li

Processed: notforwarded 318531

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Not a bug in FreePWING. > notforwarded 318531 Bug#318531: edict-fpw: FTBFS: fpwedict: too long word Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to Motoyuki Kasahara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: severity 360359 serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 360359 serious Bug#360359: cthugha: FTBFS (gcc-4.1): extra qualification 'InterfaceMain::' on member 'doKey' Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debia

Bug#382465: FTBFS on arm, sparc, ia64, hppa

Package: tla Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source tla 1.3.5+dfsg-2 fails to build from source on arm, sparc, ia64 and hppa[1]. The error presented on all but arm is: /build/buildd/tla-1.3.5+dfsg/src/tla/tests/test-framework: line 26: 18604 Bus error

Processed: tag 318531 patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 318531 patch Bug#318531: edict-fpw: FTBFS: fpwedict: too long word There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#382134: postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade path

Hi, Kjetil Kjernsmo [2006-08-11 8:06 +0200]: > >   dpkg -s postgresql > Status: deinstall ok config-files > Config-Version: 7.4.7-6sarge1 Hah, exactly what I wanted to see. :) > Aha, I don't quite remember what I did, but since the only db I needed > to preserve was the SA db, and sa-learn has

Bug#382134: postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade path

On Friday 11 August 2006 10:37, you wrote: > Hi, > > Kjetil Kjernsmo [2006-08-11 8:06 +0200]: > > >   dpkg -s postgresql > > > > Status: deinstall ok config-files > > Config-Version: 7.4.7-6sarge1 > > Hah, exactly what I wanted to see. :) Good! :-) > > Aha, I don't quite remember what I did,

Bug#382467: mutt compile error while trying to include external (http://) xsl file

Package: mutt Version: 1.5.12-1 Severity: serious Hello, I tried to compile the mutt package manually, but got the following error: make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/sebastianw/work/compile_box/mutt/mutt-1.5.12/obj-i486-linux-gnu/doc' ( sed -e "s/@VERSION\@/`cat ../../VERSION` (`cut -d\\" -f2

Bug#378728: Bugs to be closed when libxmlada1 is removed from the archive

block 378728 by 382049 block 372771 by 382049 block 350172 by 382049 thanks I have requested removal of libxmlada1 (see #382049); I'll close this bug when done. -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#382465: FTBFS on arm, sparc, ia64, hppa

> tla 1.3.5+dfsg-2 fails to build from source on arm, sparc, ia64 and > hppa[1]. Actually it builds, but the test suite fails on those architectures. I reported that upstream and they're working on it. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2006-08/msg6.html Maybe we can drop the te

Processed: Bugs to be closed when libxmlada1 is removed from the archive

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 378728 by 382049 Bug#378728: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gnat (< 3.16) Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs of 378728 added: 382049 > block 372771 by 382049 Bug#372771: libxmlada1: FTBFS: bashisms in debian/rules Was not blocked by an

Bug#382466: adacontrol: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory

Package: adacontrol Version: 1.4r20-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS The buildd logs on all archs report a failure: dh_installdirs -padacontrol /usr/bin /usr/share/doc/adacontrol dh_install -padacontrol adactl /usr/bin dh_installdocs -padacontrol doc/*.html doc/*.pdf doc/*.txt dh_installi

Bug#360359: marked as done (cthugha: FTBFS (gcc-4.1): extra qualification 'InterfaceMain::' on member 'doKey')

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:32:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360359: fixed in cthugha 1.4-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#381456: adonthell: don't include your copy of sdl_ttf and build-dep on libsdl-ttf2.0-dev instead

tag 380756 patch thanks On Wed, Aug 09, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: > So please consider build depending on libsdl-ttf2.0-dev. Same thing about libsdl-mixer and libsdl. I've prepared a patch but it is not perfect. Here it is, but I don't tag all the reports "patch" yet, though. The pa

Bug#381475: initramfs-tools: resume from hibernation broke after change to klibc resume

Just guessing, but do you have uswsusp (user software suspend) installed? This package also provides a "resume" binary but it is installed to /usr/sbin/ in the initrd. As scripts/local-premount/resume does not use an absolute path for resume, maybe it picks the wrong resume binary. Cheers, Michael

Bug#382480: FTBFS: dh-installudev only in recent debhelper

Package: mdadm Version: 2.5.2-10 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.2 As subject says, dh-installudev is only available with most recent versions of debhelper, so requires a tightened build-dependency on debhelper. According to debhelper changelog, dh-installudev was introduced in versio

Bug#382481: 44bsd-rdist: insecure temporary file

Package: 44bsd-rdist Version: 2000-6 Severity: grave Tags: security 44bsd-rdist creates a temporary file with mktemp(3), and opens it without using O_EXCL, which makes it vulnerable to symlink attacks. Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Processed: setting package to mdadm mdadm-udeb, tagging 382480

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > package mdadm mdadm-udeb Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mdadm mdadm-udeb > tags 382480 + pending Bug#382480: FTBFS: dh-installudev only in recent debhelper Tags were: confirmed Tags

Processed: tagging 382480

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 382480 confirmed Bug#382480: FTBFS: dh-installudev only in recent debhelper There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#382134: marked as done (postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade path)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:53:32 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Works now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Processed: Closing with proper version

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 372796 Bug#372796: ImportError: No module named eric3config Bug reopened. > close 372796 3.9.0-1 Bug#372796: ImportError: No module named eric3config 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in

Processed: Re: Bug#382029: gnome-gv continually opens gratuitious FTP connections to 208.113.133.22

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 382029 normal Bug#382029: gnome-gv continually opens gratuitious FTP connections to 208.113.133.22 Severity set to `normal' from `critical' > retitle 382029 gnome-gv gratuitously opens URLs from .recently-used Bug#382029: gnome-gv continually

Bug#382029: gnome-gv continually opens gratuitious FTP connections to 208.113.133.22

severity 382029 normal retitle 382029 gnome-gv gratuitously opens URLs from .recently-used stop Hi Christian, > gnome-gv couldn't display the file here, too, but I did not notice any FTP > connections. > > Which process exactly was it that you attached the strace to? Firefox or a > still runnin

Bug#382134: marked as done (postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade path)

reopen 382134 severity 382134 normal found 382134 58 thanks Debian Bug Tracking System [2006-08-11 6:03 -0700]: > So, the conclusion is that I borked the install by massaging too hard > when I installed pg 8.1. After purging the old database, it works. However, there are still some things that

Processed: Re: Bug#382134: marked as done (postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade path)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 382134 Bug#382134: postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade path Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity 382134 normal Bug#382134: postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade path Severity

Bug#382491: segfaults on startup

Package: lmms Severity: grave Version: 0.1.4-1 hi, lmms keeps segfaulting right after the configuration dialog finished: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lmms Segmentation fault removing ~/.lmmsrc.xml makes it start the configuration assistant again. GDB Backtrace shows: gdb) bt [..] #15 0xa7a6a1b8 i

Bug#382467: mutt compile error while trying to include external (http://) xsl file

Hi, IIRC, adding a build-dep on docbook-xsl might fix this. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: data loss -> RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 293556 grave Bug#293556: gnupg kill my pubring.gpg Severity set to `grave' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Processed: I'm sorry I was mistaken

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 382467 mutt Bug#382467: mutt compile error while trying to include external (http://) xsl file Bug reassigned from package `xsltproc' to `mutt'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trackin

Processed: xsltproc ignores --nonet

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 382467 xsltproc Bug#382467: mutt compile error while trying to include external (http://) xsl file Bug reassigned from package `mutt' to `xsltproc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tra

Bug#382004: Win32-UPX Heap Overflow is also present in clamav in stable

Comparing the exploitable code from http://www.overflow.pl/adv/clamav_upx_heap.txt to the code present in the source of libclamav1_0.84-2.sarge.9_i386.deb it seems to me that the current stable version of libclamav1 is vulnerable. Can you confirm/deny this? IMHO stable should be fixed?! I can sup

Processed: tagging 352800

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 352800 patch Bug#352800: coda-client: Missing Build Dependancy There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: Re: Bug#382386: tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 382386 + patch Bug#382386: tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work Tags were: help Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Bug#381338: copyright patch

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006, Francesco Pedrini wrote: > tags #381338 +patch > thanks Be careful, there are many typos... +Kakasi is Free Software, this means that you can redistribuite s/redistribuite/redistribute/g +This software is distribuited in the hope that it will be useful, s/distribuited/di

Bug#381475: initramfs-tools: resume from hibernation broke after change to klibc resume

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Just guessing, but do you have uswsusp (user software suspend) > installed? This package also provides a "resume" binary but it is > installed to /usr/sbin/ in the initrd. > As scripts/local-premount/resume does not use an absolute pa

Bug#382386: tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work

tags 382386 + patch thanks This adds support for HPPA linux machines. lamont diff -ur t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf --- t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf2006-08-10 22:50:08.0 + +++ tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf

Bug#382465: marked as done (FTBFS on arm, sparc, ia64, hppa)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:02:25 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382465: fixed in tla 1.3.5+dfsg-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#382004: Win32-UPX Heap Overflow is also present in clamav in stable

This one time, at band camp, Ralf Schlatterbeck said: > Comparing the exploitable code from > http://www.overflow.pl/adv/clamav_upx_heap.txt > to the code present in the source of libclamav1_0.84-2.sarge.9_i386.deb > it seems to me that the current stable version of libclamav1 is > vulnerable. > >

Bug#382386: tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work

Thanks a lot! Regards, // Ola On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:55:26AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > tags 382386 + patch > thanks > > This adds support for HPPA linux machines. > > lamont > > diff -ur t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf > tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf > --- t/tightvnc

Bug#382512: view3ds: FTBFS: build-dep on removed xlibmesa-glu-dev

Package: view3ds Version: 1.0.0-9.1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of view3ds_1.0.0-9.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 2006081

Bug#380318: missing libtool variables

I looked at this briefly and I it appears to be a problem with the libtool script that is used. When building in Output/alsa I get errors like: ../../libtool: line 3944: 'ELF [0-9][0-9]*-bit [LM]SB (shared object|dynamic lib )': command not found ../../libtool: line 5802: test: : integer

Bug#382252: ImportError: No module named bdiff

severity 382252 normal tags 382252 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks As I said, I cannot reproduce this bug. So I tag it and downgrade the severity for now. Best regards, Vincent PS: I will be on vacation (without email access) for 10 days. Vincent Danjean a écrit : > Michael Gebetsroith

Processed: Re: Bug#382252: ImportError: No module named bdiff

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 382252 normal Bug#382252: ImportError: No module named bdiff Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > tags 382252 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#382252: ImportError: No module named bdiff Tags were: patch Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible >

Bug#287494: marked as done (lopster: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:17:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#287494: fixed in lopster 1.2.0.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#382467: I'm sorry I was mistaken

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 03:59:55PM +0200, InterNetX - Sebastian Wiesinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reassign 382467 mutt > thanks > > Sorry, > > it was my mistake to assign this bug to xsltproc, because (as I was > told now) it's working as it should, and exiting with an error > *because* it'

Bug#380318: Bugs XMMS

"I've tested the aforementioned additions in my AMD64 box before building XMMS from source. The resulting package correctly builds the Output/ plugins, therefore with this changes XMMS is able to work correctly under Sid in AMD64. -- Alberto CapellaGNU/Linux user Nº 414744[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#382534: mxv: FTBFS due to X.org transition, g++4, and fortran

Package: mxv Version: 1.32-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, now that ivtools was updated to provide a correct Imakefile fragment, mxv fails to compile because: * it uses old /usr/X11R6/include path * it needs g++4 tweaks * it needs a fortran guru I know that mxv has been requested to be r

Bug#381236: tkfont: tkfont fails to start

On 8/10/06, Angelina Carlton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please send the output of "apt-cache policy coreutils" coreutils: Installed: 5.97-3 Candidate: 5.97-3 Version table: *** 5.97-3 0 500 http://debian.yorku.ca unstable/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Well, I w

Bug#381236: tkfont: tkfont fails to start

On 8/10/06, Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've seen the warning from sort somewhere before. There is a new version uploaded, but for some reason it's not accepting my GPG signature. I'm still in the keyring so I'm awaiting a reply from the admins - I'll try contacting them through

Bug#381666: marked as done (libselinux: FTBFS on powerpc (refers to PAGE_SIZE not supplied by ppc kernel-headers))

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:44:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381666: fixed in libselinux 1.30.22-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#293556: data loss -> RC

tags 293556 + unreproducible moreinfo help thanks martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > severity 293556 grave > thanks > > It just did it again. I am thus making the bug RC. Obviously this works for me - I've never had gpg trash a pubring.gpg and I've often interrupted it while it was fe

Bug#293556: data loss -> RC

also sprach James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.11.1853 +0100]: > Obviously this works for me - I've never had gpg trash a pubring.gpg > and I've often interrupted it while it was fetching a key. If you > want anything to happen to this bug, more information is definitely > going to be needed

Processed: Re: Bug#293556: data loss -> RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 293556 + unreproducible moreinfo help Bug#293556: gnupg kill my pubring.gpg There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo, help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#381338: copyright patch

On Friday 11 August 2006 17:13, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006, Francesco Pedrini wrote: > > tags #381338 +patch > > thanks > > Be careful, there are many typos... > Argh, thanks Mohammed, should be fixed in the attached patch, sorry. I was really tired when I wrote that :

Bug#381976: marked as done (Do not call gtk-update-icon-cache)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:17:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381976: fixed in lyx 1.4.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#381622: marked as done (lyx: Missing /usr/share/lyx/textclass.lst)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:17:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381622: fixed in lyx 1.4.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#335127: marked as done (removal of automake1.6)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:33:03 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line NMU Acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#381338: copyright patch

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006, Francesco Pedrini wrote: > Argh, thanks Mohammed, > should be fixed in the attached patch, sorry. ;) +v2 as pubblished by the Free Software Foundation. s/pubblished/published/ -- adn Mohammed Adnène Trojette

Processed: Re: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 381526 +unreproducible Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > tags 381526 +moreinfo Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: moreinfo >

Bug#382386: marked as done (tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:47:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382386: fixed in tightvnc 1.2.9-18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#381338: copyright patch

On Friday 11 August 2006 20:26, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006, Francesco Pedrini wrote: > > Argh, thanks Mohammed, > > should be fixed in the attached patch, sorry. > > ;) > > +v2 as pubblished by the Free Software Foundation. > > s/pubblished/published/ What a mess... _no

Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc

tags 381526 +unreproducible tags 381526 +moreinfo thanks * Stepan Golosunov wrote: > Vim has undeclared file conflict with vim-doc 1:6.3-071+1sarge1 on > /usr/share/doc/vim which breaks upgrades from sarge. What's the error message? I just tried to reproduce your problem and did an upgrade in a s

Bug#381456: adonthell: don't include your copy of sdl_ttf and build-dep on libsdl-ttf2.0-dev instead

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: > The patch also covers the python transition and Julien Danjou's patch. Here is an updated patch that actually builds :) -- adn Mohammed Adnène Trojette diff -u adonthell-0.3.4.cvs.20050813/config.guess adonthell-0.3.4.cvs.20050813/config.g

Bug#329387: [bugzilla #329387] new sarge package that fixes CVE-2005-4534

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: The distribution should be stable-security instead of testing-proposed-updates. Please also remove all the i18n updates: Ok, I'll make a new package with the correct distribution. The i18n updates are automatically made by the build process, it's only timtestamp upda

Bug#378346: [Chris Shoemaker] Re: gnucash on alpha

reassign 378346 libgail-dev retitle 378346 libgail-dev: gnucash crashes in libgail on alpha thanks Reassigned to libgail in accordance with upstream's recommendation; see below. Thomas --- Begin Message --- On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:32:27PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Chris Shoemaker

Bug#382569: Installation breaks Apache due to mod-perl2 old API

Package: rt3.4-apache2 Version: 3.4.4-2 Severity: grave Tags: etch Please see #308503. When I try to start Apache2, after adding: Include "/etc/request-tracker3.4/apache2-modperl2.conf" Apache will fail to start, and I get this in my Apache error log: [Fri Aug 11 15:08:52 2006] [error] Can't l

Processed: [Chris Shoemaker] Re: gnucash on alpha

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 378346 libgail-dev Bug#378346: gnucash: GnuCash 2.0 unexpectedly quits when trying to open an account register. Bug reassigned from package `gnucash' to `libgail-dev'. > retitle 378346 libgail-dev: gnucash crashes in libgail on alpha Bug#3783

Bug#380321: marked as done (XMMS loads no output plugins)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380318: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#380321: marked as done (XMMS loads no output plugins)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380115: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Remove cdrtools

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 377109 ftp.debian.org Bug#377109: cdrtools: GPL violation - makefiles distributed under non-GPL-compatible license Bug reassigned from package `cdrtools' to `ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 377109 RM: cdrtools -- RoM: non-free, license problems Bu

Bug#380115: marked as done (xmms shows file selection box, but doesn't say a beep)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380115: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#380318: marked as done (xmms is missing some libraries)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380318: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#380318: marked as done (xmms is missing some libraries)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380321: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#380321: marked as done (XMMS loads no output plugins)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380321: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#380115: marked as done (xmms shows file selection box, but doesn't say a beep)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380321: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#380318: marked as done (xmms is missing some libraries)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380115: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#380115: marked as done (xmms shows file selection box, but doesn't say a beep)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380318: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: severity of 381526 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 381526 important Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#382579: smbd fails to start after upgrade to samba 3.0.23b-1

Package: samba Version: 3.0.23b-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After running apt-get dist-upgrade to update samba to 3.0.23b-1 the smbd daemon fails to start rendering the service unusable. The nmbd daemon starts successfully. Previously was running samba 3.0.22-1 succ

Bug#382576: update-xmlcatalog: Fails to install: update-xmlcatalog: command not found

Package: docbook-xsl Version: 1.70.1.dfsg.1-0.1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to install with the following error: Setting up docbook-xsl (1.70.1.dfsg.1-0.1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/docbook-xsl.postinst: line 16: update-xmlcatalog: command not found dpkg: error processing docboo

Processed: Fixed in NMU of adonthell 0.3.4.cvs.20050813-2.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 380756 + fixed Bug#380756: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module ! Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 381456 + fixed Bug#381456: adonthell segfault on AMD-32 Tags were: patch confirmed Bug#374601: adonthell: segfaul

Bug#378496: same herei

Hello, Just to comment that same problem here. I applied the "fix" of Xavier Queralt, it seems that know has compiled. Kernel version is 2.6.17.6 -- Carles Pina i EstanyGPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Bug#379454: gcfilms: freezes during initialisation

On Sun, Jul 23, 2006, Xav wrote: > Package: gcfilms > Version: 6.1-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > When I launch it, I get this : > > $ gcfilms > *** unhandled exception in callback: > *** Can't locate object method "signal_connect" via package "GCFrame" at >

Bug#379531: marked as done (cl-launch: FTBFS: ./cl-launch.sh: Permission denied)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:07:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Uploading new package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#382445: thunderbird: Does not start at all

Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote: Running thunderbird-bin is always wrong. Figured as much, but it was the only thing giving me feedback. Running thunderbird should work. If it does not, please try to start from a different user account where you haven't used thunderbird before. If

Bug#382588: loop-aes-modules: FTBFS: fails to install modules

Package: loop-aes-modules Version: 3.1d+3+3 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of loop-aes-modules_3.1d+3+3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 20060812-0033 > **

Processed: (forw) Re: Bug#382579: smbd fails to start after upgrade to samba 3.0.23b-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 382319 382579 Bug#382319: Samba panic action Bug#382579: smbd fails to start after upgrade to samba 3.0.23b-1 Bug#382296: samba: smbd SEGFAULTS on startup Bug#382387: smbd 3.0.23b core dumps on start Bug#382552: samba: segfault with "pdb_get_

Bug#374131: The new upstream release fixes this bug

I've downloaded the new upstream release of gerbv, and tested it in a box that fails with the 1.0.1 version, and it doesn't fail with the 1.0.2 version. Here's a link to download the new upstream release: http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gerbv/gerbv-1.0.2.tar.gz As this is an RC bug, I'

Bug#382579: smbd fails to start after upgrade to samba 3.0.23b-1

forcemerge 382319 382579 thanks Quoting Richard Rawstron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: samba > Version: 3.0.23b-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > After running apt-get dist-upgrade to update samba to 3.0.23b-1 the smbd > daemon fails to start rendering the servi

Bug#376812: libglide2: Reproducible segmentation fault with Voodoo2

Hi Roberto, On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 19:11:56 +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote: > severity 376812 grave > thanks > > Upgraded severity to grave because I think it the package should be > not be released with this bug. It is ususable and crashes the display > when triyng to use it. Thanks for the rep

Bug#382445: thunderbird: Does not start at all

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 07:10:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote: > > I downloaded the source from mozilla and installed and that worked. It > occurs to me that prior to upgrading thunderbird via dselect it was > pulling configuration and mail folders from ~/.mozilla-thunderbird. I > noticed

Processed: Intent to NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 381338 + pending Bug#381338: kakasi: incomplete copyright statement Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#381338: Intent to NMU

tags 381338 + pending Thanks I have prepared a package that fixes this bug. It's not the same patch as the one submitted Francesco Pedrini, since it had so many errors. I copied the boiler plate included in the source files (updating the FSF address), and added the list of authors provided by up

Bug#382592: reportbug: crash

Package: reportbug Version: 3.22 Severity: grave check the following logs $ reportbug texlive-base-bin *** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. *** Using 'LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' as your from address. Detected character set: UTF-8 Please change your locale if this is incorre

Bug#381481: aptitude: FTBFS: test failure

On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 06:14:17PM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006, Julien Danjou wrote: > > > (3) If it's reproducible, can you trace through the code and see where > > > it fails? In particular, what value is being returned fr

Bug#382463: lightlab: FTBFS: build-dep on xlibmesa-glu-dev

This one time, at band camp, Julien Danjou wrote: >Package: lightlab >Version: 0.3-3.1 >Severity: serious > >Hello, > >There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Ok, I've been planning on filing for removal of this package; I don't use it, upstream's dead, I doubt it has any other users.

Bug#382445: thunderbird: Does not start at all

Alexander Sack wrote: On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 07:10:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote: I downloaded the source from mozilla and installed and that worked. It occurs to me that prior to upgrading thunderbird via dselect it was pulling configuration and mail folders from ~/.mozilla-thunderbi

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kakasi 2.3.4-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 381338 + fixed Bug#381338: kakasi: incomplete copyright statement Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

  1   2   >