Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:47:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357038: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: ttf-freefont
Severity: serious
Version: 20060126b-1
Building fails with the following messages:
# Strip the fonts for the udeb
./stripfonts.sh
./FreeSans.ttf
Script not found:
/home/zino/freefont/ttf-freefont-20060126b/scripts/strip_glyphs.pe
./FreeSansBold.ttf
Script not found:
/home/
Package: openoffice.org-gcj
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Installation fails:
Richte openoffice.org-gcj ein (2.0.2-1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-gcj.postinst: line 7:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/gcj:
Play for Real money or Just for Fun
Go Here to play -> netbackgammon.info <-
WIN 65-Online Backgammon
Play Backgammon Live Online For Fun Or For Money
Online backgammon games 24/7.
Join the 100,000+ players now!
Live tournaments and matches -
play with other people online
Imp
merge 357159 356984 357024 357067
thanks
Hi,
Michael Kallas wrote:
> Installation fails:
> Richte openoffice.org-gcj ein (2.0.2-1) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-gcj.postinst: line 7:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/gcj: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
God damnit. This bug already was
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 357159 356984 357024 357067
Bug#356984: openoffice.org-gcj: Uninstallable because of missing gcj symlink
Bug#357024: openoffice.org-gcj: post-installation script fails
Bug#357067: openoffice.org-gcj: installation problems: gcj: No such file or
di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 357160 grave
Bug#357160: Missing postinstall script dependency.
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 357160 356984 357024 357067
Bug#356984: openoffice.org-gcj: Uninstallable because of missing gcj symlink
Bug#357024: openoffice.org-gcj: post-inst
tags 285257 + patch
thanks
The following patch was found in the fedora version of ext2resize, and
claim to fix all endian issues with the package. When it is inserted
instead of the 01_fix-endianess patch in debian version 1.1.19-3 of
ext2resize, it should solve this bug. Can anyone test and ve
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 285257 + patch
Bug#285257: ext2resize - invalid superblock on BE machines
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Package: apr-util
Followup-For: Bug #350677
Here is a dpatch file to force the use of the -fPIC flags.
You can also find source and binary packages (for i386 and ia64) with
this modification on my web page :
http://dept-info.labri.fr/~danjean/deb.html#apr-util
Best regards,
Vincent
-- Sys
Dear Romain,
On Mit, 15 Mär 2006, Romain Francoise wrote:
> > /usr/bin/texi2dvi: etex exited with bad status, quitting.
> > /usr/bin/texi2dvi: see tramp.log for errors.
> This is apparently a bug in texinfo. If I build tramp with texinfo
> 4.8-4, everything's fine. Attempting to build with texi
Well, after a bit of testing, I'm going to use this patch instead:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2006-01/0117.html
which seems to work very well. The "right fix" will be in 5.53, I suppose,
but for now this is more than enough to close the hole.
[ Additionally, for 5.50,
Hi,
note that there is not much that can be done about this without a backtrace.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: firebird2
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Apparently firebird 1.5.3 fixes a buffer overflow. I saw it at
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17077. More details at
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/427480
The researcher has a patch for the specific problem he found in
Sorry for the duplicate; I forgot to check the bug-tracking system.
No need to get upset. I'm just one end-user who didn't check the
bug-list; considering the demand for OpenOffice and how many people are
likely using it, it seems inevitable that you will be inundated with such
annoyances.
Package: dssi
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: serious
This package fails to build from source in unstable. It fails when it
tries to install the binary and cannot find it - the reason is that
the binary was not built. I can reproduce this on i386 and mips on
unstable.
(sid)2866:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.12
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** Please type your report below this line ***
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 14:14, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi,
> note that there is not much that can be done about this without a
> backtrace.
Might as well close it...I can't reproduce it anymore now.
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber: Because it's ti
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7-smp
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
after I install of linux-image 2.6.15-1-k7-smp (or 2.6.15-1-k7 or even
2.6.15-1-486) and reboot
i can no longer use keyboard or mouse.
I must log in from ssh.
this is very problema
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 357187 important
Bug#357187: installation-report: etch beta2 install not recognize keyboard mouse
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Hi I think so. It should useless for next release.On 3/14/06, Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,Since this package served its purpose for upgrades to sarge, can it beremoved?
Thanks,Matej
Paul Johnson a écrit :
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 14:14, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi,
note that there is not much that can be done about this without a
backtrace.
Might as well close it...I can't reproduce it anymore now.
Does this mean you're letting the decision to close to the m
Package: svk
Version: 1.07-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
below is the error message.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ for i in `svk list //mirror`; do svk sync
//mirror/$i; done
Syncing http://svn.colorstudy.
> "Martin" == Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Package: heimdal
Martin> Version: 0.7.2-1
Martin> Severity: serious
Martin> It seems you're missing a depends on comerr-dev.
Hmm... Curious. It looks like limpam-heimdal has never been compiled
against Heimdal
> Shall we make a truce, a peace even, and move on?
Yes, totally, of course, thanks, and sorry.
> --
> Jérôme Marant
Hi Norbert,
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I assume that this is due to the change of dependencies. The changelog
> of -5 shows:
> * Remove the dependency on tetex-bin | tex-common, we can live without
> it. This also fixes the Priority failure of texinfo=standard depending
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
