Package: ksim
Version: 4:3.4.2-2
Severity: serious
ksim depends on libsnmp5 which is no more in Unstable. It needs
rebuild against libsnmp9-dev. See #322500.
Seo Sanghyeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:07:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I just discovered that the ntp source is a nest of licensing problems.
> The arlib subdir isn't distributable.
> Neither is the entire libparse subdir, or anything else by Frank Kardel.
> I'm not actually sure it will build witho
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 10:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:07:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > I just discovered that the ntp source is a nest of licensing problems.
> >
> > The arlib subdir isn't distributable.
> > Neither is the entire libparse subdir, or anyt
Package: splay
Version: 0.9.5.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
splay depends on libid3-3.8.3 which does not exist anymore. A simple
recompilation against the up-to-date -dev packages fixes the problem.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Package: autobook
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG
Hi,
In http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html , it is
explained why the OPL (Open Publication License) v1 is considered to be
non-DFSG-free. All 3 reasons also apply to the "OPEN PUBLICATION
LICENSE Draft v0.4, 8 June 19
Package: imp3
Version: 3.2.6-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi!
Imp 3.2.8 brought a security fix, please see
http://lists.horde.org/archives/imp/Week-of-Mon-20050418/041912.html
This also contains a patch.
Please mention the CAN number in the changelog when you fix this.
imp4 is maybe alre
George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 10:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:07:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I just discovered that the ntp source is a nest of licensing problems.
The arlib subdir isn't distributable.
Neither is the entire libparse subd
severity 314465 important
quit
Version 0.9.8 will fix this bug. The defautl will be SHA1 and SHA-256
etc. will be included.
I downgrade the severity temporarily to important to allow Version 0.9.7
to enter testing before I upload the new upstream 0.9.8.
Christoph
Andreas Bogk schrieb:
> Package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 314465 important
Bug#314465: CA.pl and openssl.cnf default to insecure MD5 digest
Severity set to `important'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Package: poedit
Severity: serious
Version: 1.3.3-4
Tags: experimental
Hi,
you seem to miss a build-dep on dpatch
> Checking correctness of source dependencies...
> Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-4
> linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1 gcc-4.0_4.0.1-6 g++-4.0_4.0.1-6
> binutils_2.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:20:05AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: poedit
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1.3.3-4
> Tags: experimental
>
> Hi,
Hi Martin
Thanks for your bugreport.
> you seem to miss a build-dep on dpatch
Not quite, I seem to have forgotten to remove everything regar
Package: grubconf
Version: 0.5.1-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
i checked grubconf today. after playing around i pressed 'Revert' and
after that i choose 'close'. the dialog did not close. so i pressed
the close-button of the windowmanager. the dialog stayed (i waited
severity 328143 normal
thanks
We traced this problem to hfsplus needing nls_utf8 as module, which d-i did
not include, so downgrading the severity. waldi said he would provide a patch
for a more graceful handling on this, so i leave htis bug open until then.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUB
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328143 normal
Bug#328143: [powerpc] d-i dies on apple hardware with a HFS+ kernel OOPS,
freezing base-installer
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Package: libmpfr-dev
Version: 2.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The MPFR documentation is provided as texinfo source file licensed
under the GFDL version 1.1 "or any later version".
Since there is only a limited number of useful rephrasing of this
technical documentation, I co
Package: chrony
Version: 1.20-8
Followup-For: Bug #298709
After applying the following patch, I tried building (with gcc-4.0),
installing and running the chrony package on Testing/i386, and it seems
to run smoothly.
Unfortunately I have no 64-bit capable hardware to test on. Would you
like to t
Hi Matthijs,
>> I've never tested openntpd, but it is the obvious replacement in case
>> of legal problems with ntp and it has been released with sarge.
>
> I use openntpd and that works better then ntp IMHO.
Last time i checked,
- it doesn't support attached clocks, so no stratum 1
- it only se
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:17:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328128: fixed in tecnoballz 0.91cvs20050828-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325208: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325208: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326567: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326716: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326716: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301390 -experimental
Bug#301390: libjavascript-perl: Simple class binding causes SIGSEGV
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Bits from the build-log:
> make[5]: Entering directory
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall'
> make[6]: Entering directory
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firefox-1.4.99
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 327664 normal
Bug#327664: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign 327664 wnpp
Bug#327664: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `doc-debian-ko' to
Package: gnometab
Version: 0.7.4-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'gnometab' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
debian/rules clean
debian/rules:8: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatc
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:10:43AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: tora
> Version: 1.3.18-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> tora failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
>
> checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328210: fixed in kdeutils 4:3.4.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I
have not copied the msgs by hand, but can do so if necessary.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: t
Package: slib
Version: 3a1-4.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I had problems when trying to use SLIB for the first time:
guile> (use-modules (ice-9 slib))
guile> (require 'priority-queue)
ERROR: In procedure open-file:
ERROR: Permission denied: "/usr/share/slibcat"
ABORT:
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327424: fixed in mailutils 1:0.6.90-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: gcc-h8300-hms
Version: 2.95.2.2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'gcc-h8300-hms' on i386/unstable,
I get the following error:
dh_testdir
# configure gcc build for our cross target
/gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/src/configure --target=h8300-hitachi-hms
--prefix=/usr --exec-prefi
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
> Version: 2.6.12-6
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I
> have not copied the msgs by hand,
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326567: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Le lundi 12 septembre 2005 à 21:57 +0200, Yann Dirson a écrit :
> I infer from your questions that you cannot reproduce ?
No, and we would already have a bunch of dups if pygtk was broken, that
seems to be specific to your installation.
> FWIW, a search for _gtk on the output of "strace -efile
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:18:22PM +0200, Roman Medina wrote:
> Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
> Grsec patch is incompatible with glibc post-v.2.3.2.
I don't think that's actually true. From what I can tell, what happens
is that
Package: osgcal
Version: 0.1.32-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'osgcal' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:
x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./include -DSUPPORT_GIF_HLS
-I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-Wall -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 301327
Bug#301327: php4-idn: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> quit
St
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327896: fixed in php4-idn 1.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hello,
Thanks for your response, Steve. It sounds very logical to me. Anyway,
I've cc'ed spender (grsec developper). It would be interesting if he
could add his comments here in this ticket since he's perhaps the more
capable person to answer grsec issues. Perhaps he can refute some of
your argume
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325209: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325952: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327985: fixed in openmosixview 1.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328153: fixed in rezound 0.12.2beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 327981 pending
Bug#327981: kpsk: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 00:03 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The maintainers should have a chance to clear up this question first.
I'll have a look at it today.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: eric
Version: 3.7.1+3.7.2-rc2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I start eric I get the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]1$ eric
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/eric/modules/eric3.py", line 15, in ?
from qt import QTextCodec, SIG
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0300, Harri Järvi wrote:
[...]
> The problem is that the README in linuxsampler says the following thing:
>
> "This software is distributed under the GNU General Public License (see
> COPYING file), and may not be used in commercial applications without
> asking
forwarded 328238 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249579
thanks
Could you try to build with one of the tricks given on the upstream bug
report ? We will add the corresponding workaround in debian/rules
Cheers
Mike
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 328238 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249579
Bug#328238: mozilla-firefox: FTBFS on s390/experimental
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249579.
> thanks
Stopping proce
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325959: fixed in hydrogen 0.9.2final-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Package: stk
> Version: 4.2.0-7
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
>
> Build log is at:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=stk&ver=4.2.0-7&arch=m68k&stamp=1123315454&file=log&as=raw
>
> GCC segfaults. Good luck tr
Package: freewheeling
Version: 0.5pre4-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Freewheeling crashs when it starts, with the following error :
...
binding: input 'key'
-condition 'key' == 307 [rightalt]
-> output 'set-variable'
-set 'var' = 'VAR_keyheld
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324054: fixed in swami 0.9.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
2005/9/13, Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 05-Sep-13 15:09, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > Does the package actually run and work this way? If so, I'll simply
> > apply your patch. Although, it is admittedly a bit of a hack.
>
> It _is_ a hack. I did not really check it intensively, but basica
severity 328242 important
merge 328242 319986
thanks
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
> Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I
> have not copied the msgs by hand, but can do so if necessary.
Read the old bugreports. This is a known pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328242 important
Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac
G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.
Severity set to `important'.
> merge 328242 319986
Bug#319986: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powe
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:18:48AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> 2005/9/13, Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 05-Sep-13 15:09, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > > Does the package actually run and work this way? If so, I'll simply
> > > apply your patch. Although, it is admittedly a bit of a hack.
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327987: fixed in picwiz 0.3.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> UURGH, NO. This will break SWT on 32 bit archs - if it works on 64 bit archs
> at all.
>
> You cannont compare normal C code with JNI C code. JNI C code has much higher
> restrictions.
There's that cry of outrage! Hehe. Are there any 32-bit archite
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328102: fixed in mac-fdisk 0.1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: ladspa-sdk
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: serious
ladspa-sdk FTBFS on m68k due to an ICE[1]:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/ladspa-sdk-1.1/src'
cc -I. -O3 -fPIC -o plugins/amp.o -c plugins/amp.c
plugins/amp.c: In function '_init':
plugins/amp.c:314: internal compiler error: Segmenta
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:52:00AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> 2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > UURGH, NO. This will break SWT on 32 bit archs - if it works on 64 bit
> > archs at all.
> >
> > You cannont compare normal C code with JNI C code. JNI C code has much
> > higher res
Package: zinf
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
zinf is currently uninstallable.
Because of the C++ transition, zinf needs to be rebuilt against the
current libc6-dev, libartsc0-dev, libmusicbrainz4-dev,
libid3-3.8.3-dev. All of these are built on all arches, so you don't
need to v
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Miernik told:
> Package: mutt-ng
> Version: 0.0+20050831-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After upgrading 0.0+20050728-1 -> 0.0+20050831-1 muttng is unable to
> modify my system mail spool /var/mail/
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328042: fixed in chromium 0.9.12-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: bittorrent
Version: 3.4.2-5
Followup-For: Bug #323556
Now it seems there is no libwxgtk-python-like package at all. :(
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/d
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327983: fixed in kwavecontrol 0.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 00:03 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The maintainers should have a chance to clear up this question first.
Ok, I've just been through the ntp source tree looking at all the
copyright and license assertions. Executive summary is that there are
indeed some problems, but it's
Package: bbpager
Version: 0.3.1-5
Followup-For: Bug #322306
I was able to reproduce this bug on my system using both XFree86 and
XOrg servers. bbpager seems to be incompatible with blackbox 0.70 and
higher. It works fine with fluxbox.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testi
On 13.09.05 Sean Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:27:26PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > . And below we find the conditions you quoted. I'll contact Tim
> > if we can patch the files and replace the lines above by
> > something like:
> >
> > "see sem-read.me.
Hi Russ,
I'm the maintainer of the package, but I'm not a developer. Normally,
I package pytables and who used to be my sponsor (Daniel Bungert)
upload it to the Debian repository.
However, Daniel seems to be very busy lately (in fact, he said me that
he was about to leave his developer position
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:17:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326903: fixed in python2.4 2.4.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: manpages-es-extra
Version: 0.8a-13
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi!
when trying to install passwd 3:4.0.12-1 from experimental,
dpkg claims:
dpkg: error al procesar
/var/cache/apt/archives/passwd_1%3a4.0.12-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/man/es/ma
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:25:08PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Does a "import gtk._gtk" work? If not what does it say?
Bingo. That module import fails when DISPLAY is not set or invalid,
which means the configure test for gnome.canvas in gcompris will fail
on buildd's.
Now is there another
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:05:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > yeah, that sounds good. whether this should affect sarge for a
> > point-release i think is worth pinging debian-release, i guess.
> >
> Is this really RC? Now that we know that the license statement inside
> the files are wrong
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #328159 important
Bug#328159: mutt-ng: cannot modify system mail spool, says: Mailbox is
read-only.
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328059: fixed in mailcrypt 3.5.8+CVS.2005.04.29.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You replace jint (which is garanteed to be 32 bit) with long which dont has
> this garantee.
> Why dont you just build the native sources that upstream supplies for 64 bit
> systems?
> That is what I do in the eclipse build works very fine. BTW: My E
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> 2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You replace jint (which is garanteed to be 32 bit) with long which dont has
> > this garantee.
> > Why dont you just build the native sources that upstream supplies for 64
> > bit sys
For your information, the split-out of the Qt styles which is the cause of
this problem will be reverted in the next upload of Qt, which will likely
take place in a few days.
Cheers,
Christopher Martin
pgpWBkV12Ld2P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dear Timothy, Sebastian and Denis,
The following bug report we got here down in the Debian Bug Tracking
system. I've pointed the submitter to sem-read.me, which clearly
says, that seminar can be distributed under LPPL.
He agreed that we should remove the confusing statement and replace
it by somet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 318285
Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tag 318285 woody sarge
Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: woody, sarge
>
End of message,
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:08:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #328078: unshield: FTBFS: aclocal: command not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Package: libdb2-dev
Version: 2:2.7.7.0-10
Severity: serious
Justification: Clint said it's serious on irc
libdb2 doesn't seem to have a postrm script that would run ldconfig,
meaning that after libdb2-dev is installed, and libdb2, libdb2-util, and
libdb2-dev are removed, there is a /usr/lib/libdb
Package: kaffe-pthreads
Version: 2:1.1.5-cvs20050808-2
Severity: grave
In the sid chroot on escher:
$ /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/bin/jar
Internal error: caught an unexpected exception.
Please check your CLASSPATH and your installation.
java/lang/NullPointerException
at gnu.classpath.SystemPropert
2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I just dont get why you wanna patch when upstream has already did the work
> for you
> and made SWT work on both types of platforms. And changing jint to long can
> cause
> bugs that are really hard to debug.
Simply because maintaining two source tr
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:40:54PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> 2005/9/14, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I just dont get why you wanna patch when upstream has already did the work
> > for you
> > and made SWT work on both types of platforms. And changing jint to long can
> > cause
> > bu
If Timothy is listening, and is happy, the best solution would
be to patch the file on CTAN. I can get that done, but best
to give TVZ time to respond.
--
Sebastian Rahtz
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
OSS Wa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322306 confirmed
Bug#322306: bbpager fails to start under blackbox and fluxbox (possibly others)
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Hi,
fbi only requires a re-compile to fix this bug. I've tried it and
I can verify that it works without problems.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I just got pointed at this bug, I am a developer on the SWT
project.
The issue here is that in Java memory we need to store pointers to C
objects. jint is 32 bits, jlong is 64 bits, by the Java spec. To keep
memory use down, we decided to have the Java and C code for 64-bit GTK+
ports be
Dato suggested rebuilding this package to have it follow the KDE
transition.
However, trying to do so (because I wanted to give it a try), I
failed:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX i486-linux-gnu-g++
-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500
-D_BS
Package: cabber
Version: 0.4.0-test5-2
Severity: serious
The debian/copyright file doesn't make sense, it says:
--
Copyright:
Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GNU Trueprint comes with NO WARRANTY,
That would be excellent of you. Thanks Sebastian. Of course, all these
are just obsolete attempts at copyleft notices and I'm happy to have
whatever is the current norm substituted.
tim
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
If Timothy is listening, and is happy, the best solution would
be to patch the file
*puts Upstream Developer hat on*
Rhythmbox Applet 0.1.8 is going to be released Real Soon Now (i.e., once
its translators have a chance to update their .po files), and it
includes a fix for this bug. In the meantime, I can confirm that the
patch fixes the problem, and I have already made the same
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 325120 grave
Bug#325120: package: libpam-ldap "unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_ldap.so)"
Severity set to `grave'.
> end
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> This bug makes account access impossible for systems that rely up
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:45:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pgadmin3 back to an installable state.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:45:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pgadmin3 back to an installable state.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
