Processed: Re: Bug#325528: libm17n-0: segfaults with mgp, rendering it unusuable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 325528 unreproducible Bug#325528: libm17n-0: segfaults with mgp, rendering it unusuable There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Bug#324108: libsablevm1: libffi2 is no longer available in unstable

+++ Kurt Roeckx [27/08/05 23:09 +0200]: > Hi, > > I did an NMU of this package to get it installable again. I've > attached the diff of the NMU. Hi, Thanks for the upload. I was on a very long "no computers" vacations (and I am also waiting since maaany months to have my new GPG key included i

Bug#325345: tvtime: FTBFS

On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:24:12PM -0500, Billy Biggs wrote: > Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Package: tvtime > > Version: 0.9.15-1 > > Severity: serious > > ../plugins/greedyh.asm:270: error: unknown register name 'mm7' in 'asm' > This is because of a change in gcc. In version 4, they

Processed: cpio fun

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package cpio Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cpio > retitle 306693 [CAN-2005-1229] cpio: allows extracting insecure pathnames > (leading slash = / and dotdot = ..) Bug#306693: cpio: allows extracting insecure pathnames (leading slash = / and dotdot =

Processed: Re: Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 325484 udev Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12 Bug reassigned from package `udev,linux-2.6' to `udev'. > retitle 325484 udev lacks sarge->etch upgrade path Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12 Changed Bug title. >

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

On Monday 29 August 2005 12:35, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Aug 29, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In effect this means that any user having udev installed will have to > > put udev on hold. > > No, if the kernel has not been upgraded yet then preinst will fail. Hmm. Won't that fail the who

Bug#321669: enigma: Copyright violation for menu.s3m

On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 09:09:33PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > Hi, > > Erich, applying the GPL to a documentation is ok, but don't you think you > > are > > pushing things a bit hard by applying it to a music file too ? > > It doesn't need to be GPL, but it needs to be DFSG-free. Well, i was

Bug#321669: enigma: Copyright violation for menu.s3m

Hi, > Well, i was just surprised that you listed the second alternative as asking > the author to GPL it, instead of asking for a fre elicence, but i believe that > in this case, any licence that allows distribution of the music track should > be ok, not sure though. Not by the post-sarge require

Bug#321669: enigma: Copyright violation for menu.s3m

Hi, > We spoke about documentation, firmware, and other such stuff which you have a > reasonable reason to modify, but music for a game ? You are free to take the > music and replace it with another, i suppose. This is an s3m, screamtracker file. You can modify it quite easily with so called track

Bug#321669: enigma: Copyright violation for menu.s3m

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:38:29PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > Hi, > > Well, i was just surprised that you listed the second alternative as asking > > the author to GPL it, instead of asking for a fre elicence, but i believe > > that > > in this case, any licence that allows distribution of the

Bug#323881: marked as done (bakery2.0: builds a library package with the same name and different ABI on rebuild)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:00:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line library packages removed from unstable and/or testing, these bugs no longer apply has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#317690: marked as done (libgconfmm2.0-1c102: depends on unavailable libsigc++-1.2-5c102)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:00:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line library packages removed from unstable and/or testing, these bugs no longer apply has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#325630: libgnujaxp-java: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends

Package: libgnujaxp-java Severity: serious Version: 1.3-3 Because libgnujaxp-java Build-Depends on gcj-3.4 and libgcj4-dev, it cannot be built on a current sid system. If I instead install gcj-4.0 and libgcj6-dev, and edit debian/rules to set GCJ to gcj-4.0, then I get the error message: if /bin

Bug#286496: marked as done (gconfmm2.0: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:00:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line library packages removed from unstable and/or testing, these bugs no longer apply has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#325200: marked as done (gnome-vfsmm1.3: builds a library package with the same name and different ABI on rebuild)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:00:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line library packages removed from unstable and/or testing, these bugs no longer apply has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#324548: marked as done (pinentry-qt: unmet dependancies)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:02:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324548: fixed in pinentry 0.7.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#318693: marked as done (piuparts: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318693: fixed in piuparts 0.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#325345: tvtime: FTBFS

Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > The question is, what prevents the inline assembly in question from > being executed on 486 or non-MMX 586 systems? I didn't see any arch > checks in the code that would prevent this, but maybe I missed > something. Each deinterlacer method has a parameter

Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Shaun Jackman wrote: I could reproduce it several times, and I'm sure it's the cause of this. The original file name was: 70's - Working At The Carwash.mp3 OK wow that was a particularly nasty bug, and it took me 2 hours to find. The error was in "filenaming.c" in the fu

Bug#325345: tvtime: FTBFS

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 04:13:57PM -0500, Billy Biggs wrote: > Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > The fix is to delete the MMX registers from the clobbers list, or > > > compile with -mmmx/-msse. I prefer removing them, as using > > > -mmmx/-msse is scary and opens you up to more gcc bugs.

Bug#318946: Upstream's response to this bug

found 318946 2.2.3-1 thanks (2.2.3-1 is the version in sarge. Hopefully this prevents the bug from being archived.) | Description | | A security vulnerability has been discovered which affects all | supported stable versions of Shorewall. This vulnerability enables | a client accepted by MAC a

Bug#307054: marked as done (Package obsolete)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:42:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed from Debian - abandoned upstream, superseded by dhcp3-server has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#325345: tvtime: FTBFS

Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > The fix is to delete the MMX registers from the clobbers list, or > > compile with -mmmx/-msse. I prefer removing them, as using > > -mmmx/-msse is scary and opens you up to more gcc bugs. > > While it's true that using more registers introduces more > pos

Processed: Upstream's response to this bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 318946 2.2.3-1 Bug#318946: shorewall: A client accepted by MAC address filtering to bypass any other rule Bug marked as found in version 2.2.3-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#325567: gem: FTBFS (amd64): 'quicktime_supported_video' was not declared in this scope

Hi, Thanks for the patch. I am fighting with a changed API for ffmpeg on unstable though. Did you compile on testing ? Cheers, Guenter On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Package: gem > Version: 1:0.90.0-17 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > When building 'gem' on amd64/unstable

Processed: retitle 325484 to udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > retitle 325484 udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12 Bug#325484: udev lacks sarge->etch upgrade path Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#324052: marked as done (FTBFS: Declaration of stel_ui with no type)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:02:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324052: fixed in stellarium 0.6.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xmms-scrobbler 0.3.8.1-4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 322583 + fixed Bug#322583: uninstallable due to C++ transition There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#325635: FTBFS: broken build-dependency on libqt3c102-mt

Package: kxdocker Severity: serious You have just uploaded a new version of kxdocker which build-depends on kdelibs4-dev and on libqt3c102-mt. This is *broken*. First, please make sure you have read the announcement about the C++ ABI transition at

Bug#325637: segfault upon startup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: pose Version: 3.5-7 Severity: grave Hi, $ pose Segmentation fault I've built the package with -ggdb Here's the backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1213828992 (LWP 24902)] 0x in ?? ()

Processed: Re: Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package gnomad2 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnomad2 > tag 324865 +fixed-upstream Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup Tags were: confirmed Tags added: fixed-upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#325345: tvtime: FTBFS

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 04:27:05PM -0500, Billy Biggs wrote: > Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > The question is, what prevents the inline assembly in question from > > being executed on 486 or non-MMX 586 systems? I didn't see any arch > > checks in the code that would prevent this, but ma

Bug#324865: gnomad2-2.8.0-2 dies during startup

package gnomad2 tag 324865 +fixed-upstream thanks Great! Thanks, Linus. Cheers, Shaun 2005/8/29, Linus Walleij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OK wow that was a particularly nasty bug, and it took me 2 hours to find. > > The error was in "filenaming.c" in the function kill_tracknumber() where > the inst

Bug#325553: marked as done (PHP is not threadsafe.)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:02:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line how about "no"? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#323929: marked as done (phpgroupware-fudforum: Incomplete check of user rights gaining access to all messages (CAN-2005-2600))

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323929: fixed in phpgroupware 0.9.16.008-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#323349: marked as done (phpgroupware: Another vulnerability in XMLRPC code)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323349: fixed in phpgroupware 0.9.16.008-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: how about "no"?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 325553 libapache2-mod-php4 Bug#325553: apache2-mpm-perchild breaks PHP4 installtion of libapache2-mod-php4 Bug reassigned from package `apache2-mpm-perchild' to `libapache2-mod-php4'. > retitle 325553 PHP is not threadsafe. Bug#325553: apache2

Bug#325639: gnome-session: FTBFS: depends on -Wl,--as-needed

Package: gnome-session Version: 2.10.0-6 Severity: serious The latest version of gnome-session fails to build on alpha and sparc with the following error: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link cc -g -Wall -O2 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -o logout-test logout-test.o util.o gsm-multiscreen.o gdm-logout-ac

Bug#324590: marked as done (libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS: Test failures)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:57:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS: Test failures has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: severity of 321987 is grave, tagging 321987, merging 321987 325605

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > severity 321987 grave Bug#321987: dhcp3-client: dhclient3 fails on sparc64 Severity set to `grave'. > tags 321987 - moreinfo Bug#321987: dhcp3-client: dhclient3 fails on sparc64 Tags

Bug#319222: ghc6: Depends on non-existing package

Hi, I would like to get a new version of ghc6 into unstable soon. I think it's best to build the current version with gcc 3.3. Upstream seem to be taking a while to get the new release out that should work with gcc 4.0, and I'm not really sure how stable that is going to be on all arches we have.

Bug#325345: tvtime: FTBFS

Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Er, P2 systems support MMX instructions, and PPC systems would never > have been able to build the inline assembly in question (therefore > it's clearly not present in any binaries being run on that platform), > so neither is actually evidence that the runtime

Bug#321669: enigma: Copyright violation for menu.s3m

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:15:06 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > We spoke about documentation, firmware, and other such stuff which you > have a reasonable reason to modify, but music for a game ? You are > free to take the music and replace it with another, i suppose. You are always free to take a progra

Processed: tagging 321987

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > tags 321987 + patch Bug#321987: dhcp3-client: dhclient3 fails on sparc64 Tags were: confirmed Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#324617: mozilla-firefox: side-bar segfaults

Chad Walstrom wrote: > Package: mozilla-firefox > Version: 1.0.4-2sarge2 > > I've also gotten mozilla to reliably crash when trying to view the > sidebar, regardless if it's history or bookmarks. I removed > mozilla-tabextensions (1.14.2005040701-1) and it quit crashing. So, > this bug should pr

Processed: severity of 325553 is wishlist

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > severity 325553 wishlist Bug#325553: PHP is not threadsafe. Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#321669: enigma: Copyright violation for menu.s3m

On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:35:36PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:34:02 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > > Erich, applying the GPL to a documentation is ok, but don't you > > > think you are pushing things a bit hard by applying it to

Bug#325643: moc: uninstallable in sid (depends on libflac6 which is UNAVAILABLE)

Package: moc Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable moc in version 2.3.1-1 which is in sid depends on libflac6 which is UNAVAILABLE, making moc uninstallable. libflac6 has been superseded by libflac7 which is in sid. -- System Information: Debian Release: testin

Bug#325647: FTBFS: quicktime/quicktime.h -> lqt/quicktime.h

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 06:54:47PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > Package: kino > Version: 0.76-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: no longer builds from source > kino looks for quicktime.h under /usr/include/quicktime, but it is installed > under /usr/include/lqt. Which is rather

Processed: traceroute sparc bus error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 320120 grave Bug#320120: [PATCH] traceroute bus error on sparc Severity set to `grave'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#325490: ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or directory.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 325490 -1 Bug#325490: ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or directory. Bug 325490 cloned as bug 325651. > reassign -1 libmagick6 6:6.2.3.6-3 Bug#325651: ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or

Bug#320120: [PATCH] traceroute bus error on sparc

On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:53:30PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > Package: traceroute > Version: 1.4a12-19 > > $ traceroute www.debian.org > traceroute to www.debian.org (194.109.137.218), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets > Bus error > > The fault occurs in send_probe, at: > > memcpy(&outd

Bug#325650: pbuilder create sid fails

Package: pbuilder Version: 0.128 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The command 'pbuilder create sid --debug' fails with this: ... ... ... I: Configuring console-tools... I: Configuring console-common... W: Failure while configuring base packages. This will be attempted 5 ti

Bug#325490: ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or directory.

clone 325490 -1 reassign -1 libmagick6 6:6.2.3.6-3 thanks On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:11:43AM +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: > Package: ale > Version: 0.7.1-1.0.1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > $ ale ./CIMG7387.jpg ale.jpg > Output file will be 'ale.jpg'. > Readi

Bug#325650: pbuilder create sid fails

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:37:44PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Package: pbuilder > Version: 0.128 Why this version of pbuilder? This isn't the current version in either testing or unstable; does this bug still occur if you upgrade? Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever lon

Bug#324473: mozilla-firefox: Segfaults on startup before showing a window

Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.4-2sarge2 Followup-For: Bug #324473 Unlike the other reports, I don't ever see a window. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > mozilla-firefox (firefox-bin:12259): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_property_get(): length value has wrapped in calculation (did you pass G_MAXLONG?)

Bug#325607: realtime-lsm: Module doesn't compile against 2.6.8-2-k7

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:26:22PM +0200, Guenter Geiger wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Nicholas Humfrey wrote: > > > Package: realtime-lsm > > Version: 0.1.1-6 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > The 2.6.8-2 kernel (which is the default on sarge) does n

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 300270 pending Bug#300270: mp3splt: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Bug#325607: realtime-lsm: Module doesn't compile against 2.6.8-2-k7

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Nicholas Humfrey wrote: > Package: realtime-lsm > Version: 0.1.1-6 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > The 2.6.8-2 kernel (which is the default on sarge) does not > have CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX enabled, which means it is not > possible to use thi

Bug#325511: marked as done (libc6: bashisms in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh script)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325511: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#325504: marked as done (libc6: Installation fails)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325504: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#325471: marked as done (libc6: Error in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh at line 100)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325471: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#325511: marked as done (libc6: bashisms in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh script)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325471: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#320156: (no subject)

I got this to install by downloading the latest libgmp3 and darcs debs from packages.debian.org and installing them by hand. Is this a dangerous thing to do ? It gives the appearance of working just fine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Bug#320156: (no subject)

Simon Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I got this to install by downloading the latest libgmp3 and darcs debs > from packages.debian.org and installing them by hand. Is this a > dangerous thing to do ? It gives the appearance of working just fine. This shouldn't cause any problem. You may b

Bug#325611: marked as done (kid3: needs rebuild with libid3-3.8.3c2)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:02:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325611: fixed in kid3 0.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#325471: marked as done (libc6: Error in /etc/init.d/glibc.sh at line 100)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325511: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:35:03PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 07:56:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > The kernel is likely going to be upgraded automatically because users will > > > be using the kernel-image-2.6-xxx packages. > > Is that a problem for some r

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:06:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Requiring that users reboot to 2.6.12 before installing the new version > > of udev from etch *is* a valid upgrade path. There were similar upgrade > > path choices th

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 07:56:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > The kernel is likely going to be upgraded automatically because users will > > be using the kernel-image-2.6-xxx packages. > > Is that a problem for some reason? > > > So we're going to have another release with a very elabora

Bug#325484: udev >= 0.060-1 and kernels >= 2.6.12

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:43:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > 1) upgrade your kernel > > > 2) dist-upgrade > > > > That doesn't seem terribly elaborate to me? And if people choose not to > > > read, well, they get a failure on dist-upgrade and get to figure it out > > > for themselves, I

Bug#324756: marked as done (Uninstallable on sid; needs rebuild due to the C++ ABI transition)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324756: fixed in gip 1.6.0.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

<    1   2