Package: umfpack
Severity: serious
depends on blas atlas2-base, see #317245
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lvm10
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Function vg_create_dir_and_group_and_nodes() in
tools/lib/vg_create_dir_and_group_and_nodes.c has
"vg_check_consistency_with_pv_and_lv < 0", which compares
the address of the function instead of the return valu
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:11:42AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Torsten Landschoff:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:44:42AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > Sigh. This is not supposed to happen...
> > > Do you have a build log?
> > Attached.
> OK, I have looked at the sources. The problem
On 05-Aug-09 14:14, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:50:38PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > I could provide a patch to make 'glibc' build the necessary
> > 'libc6-i386' and 'libc6-dev-i386' packages if this approach
> > is welcome.
I meant 'libc6-amd64' and 'libc6-dev-amd64
Hi,
Steve Langasek:
> > If necessary, additional hackery can probably be introduced to
> > openldap2's include/ldap_pvt_gnutls.h (#include ,
> > #ifdef any conflicts away, link with -lgnutls-openssl) without too much
> > headache.
>
> Ok. Couple of questions:
>
> - What is the current license o
tags 322467 + experimental
stop
On 10.08.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.0.2-31
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
>
> Just a reminder,
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14529/info
>
Martin Pitt gave me the hint, that teTeX from stable is not
vuln
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322467 + experimental
Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service
Vulnerability
Tags were: security patch
Tags added: experimental
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 321435 serious
Bug#321435: Unrecoverable error: typecheck in .getdeviceparams on s390
Severity set to `serious'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321554: fixed in plucker 1.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package revelation
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: revelation
> reassign 318012 python-crypto
Bug#318012: revelation: Can't be installed because of libgmp3 dependency
Bug reassigned from package `revelation' to `python-crypto'.
> thanks
Stopping proces
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 322467 3.0-5
Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service
Vulnerability
Bug marked as found in version 3.0-5.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 322525 sid
Bug#322525: umfpack depends on packages, beeing removed from unstable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 14:48 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:00:23PM -0400, John McCutchan wrote:
> > Package: revelation
> > Followup-For: Bug #318012
>
> > Please mark this bug as unfixed. Indeed, a correction is in order,
> > Revelation can't
> > be installed because p
Package: sound-juicer
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Library dependencies missing
$ sound-juicer
sound-juicer: error while loading shared libraries:
libgnome-media-profiles.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: evolution
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Multiple exploitable format string vulnerabilities have been found in
Evolution. Please see
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/407789/30/0/threaded
for details. 2.3.7 fixes all these issues.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debi
found 322467 3.0-5
thanks
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.0.2-31
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: can result in disk consumption and ultimately lead to a denial
> of service condition.
>
> Just a reminder,
>
> http://www.securityfocus.c
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:04:17AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >> below patch has been slurped into the Debian patches for 2.6.8, but the
> >> error posted looks like the same error I suffered when hitting this bug.
> >>
> >> Patch from
> >> http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/b
Doing a little bug work.
It looks like you're running "unstable". If so, can you still reproduce
this bug with the xorg-x11 packages? There've
been more than a few changes, and it will probably be easier for the
developers to track down the bug with
the new source package.
Thanks in advance
severity 321435 serious
quit
* Peter Palfrader
> A workaround has been added to tor so that it does not build those
> images on s390, making it build again in sarge. Therefore this bug no
> longer is RC, and I downgrade it to important.
That won't help ScummVM from failing to build, I'm afrai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 321902 +moreinfo
Bug#321902: fails to rmmod usbnet
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> tag 321902 +upstream
Bug#321902: fails to rmmod usbnet
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: upstream
> severity 321902 important
Bug#321902: fails to rmmo
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:52:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321612: scummvm/i386: uninstallable, depends on
non-existing libflac7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
tags 321902 +wontfix
thanks
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:22:39AM +0800, 肖盛文 Faris Xiao wrote:
> Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:54:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> >
> >>>rmmod usbnet
> >>>
> >>>The model usbnet can not be removed.
> >>>Also the process which execute t
Package: mmv
Version: 1.01b-12.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Under debian-amd64 mmv 1.01b-12.1 constantly segfaults.
Even when run without parameters or with --help:
$ mmv
Segmentation fault
Under debian-i386 mmv 1.01b-12.1 does not segfault but hangs on any input.
Package: yaboot
Version: 1.3.13-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'yaboot' on powerpc/unstable,
I get the following error:
gcc -Os -nostdinc -Wall -isystem `gcc -print-file-name=include` -fsigned-char
-DVERSION=\"1.3.13\" -DTEXTADDR=0x20 -DDEBUG=0 -DMALLOCADDR=0x30
-DM
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 253422 + fixed
Bug#253422: mpirun is inconvenient on SMP systems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 306305 + fixed
Bug#306305: mpich-bin: doesn't remove alternatives correctly
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 314173 + f
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:46:12PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:04:17AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Horms wrote:
> > >> below patch has been slurped into the Debian patches for 2.6.8, but the
> > >> error posted looks like the same error I suffered when hit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 318055 + fixed
Bug#318055: python2.3-crypto is uninstallable
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
-- Initial header ---
>From : "Randolph Chung" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : "John David Anglin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC :
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
PROTECTED],debian-hppa@lists.debian.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Wed, 10 Aug 20
tags +pending 309308
tags +patch 309308
thanks
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:42:54AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
> Followup-For: Bug #309308
>
> Just noticed this bug in the testing-security list. I don't know if the
> below patch has been slurped into th
Horms wrote:
> > below patch has been slurped into the Debian patches for 2.6.8, but the
> > error posted looks like the same error I suffered when hitting this bug.
> >
> > Patch from http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge/2004-September/000638.html
> >
> > Cut and paste from the web archive, so
From: http://xinehq.de/:
26.07.2005 new xine-lib and xine-ui For the first time ever, we
have 3 releases at the same time!
xine-lib 1.0.2 (release notes)
contains mostly bugfixes and is considered the safest upgrade path
for users of older distros (not gcc4).
xine-lib 1.1.0 (relea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 322500 libsnmp5,ifstat
Bug#322500: ifstat doesnt work with libsnmp 5.2.1.2
Bug reassigned from package `ifstat' to `libsnmp5,ifstat'.
> retitle 322500 libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change
Bug#322500: ifstat doesnt work with libsnmp 5.2.1
reassign 322500 libsnmp5,ifstat
retitle 322500 libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change
severity 322500 serious
thanks
Hi Craig,
downgrading the libsnmp5 seems to be the best fix for now. But if you
need/want the new libsnmp5 then recompiling the pckage will also fix
the problem. Details below
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 05:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#192196: fixed in xboard 4.2.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: udev
Version: 0.065-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
When installing udev, it detects I am not running a 2.6.12 kernel
and the installation fails. This prevents the installation of all other
packages.
Please make the 2.6.12 check a runtime check instead
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 322448 + pending
Bug#322448: libapache-request-perl: Apache::Request fails with unresolved
dynamic load
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processin
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:00:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322560: udev installation prevent the installation of
other packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: clamav-daemon
Version: 0.86.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upon attempting to start the clamav daemon, an error occurs which causes
the start to fail. Following is the error message that is displayed when
/etc/init.d/clamav-daemon is run with the start paramet
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:31:06AM -0700, ivan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:47:10AM +0930, Ron wrote:
> > are you actually working on a new upload for this now?
> > Please take a peek at #322448 in that case, if you aren't
> > aware of it already.
>
> hi, i am subscribed to the package in t
Le Samedi 6 Août 2005 06:40, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Hi Florent,
Hi Steve,
[...]
> > Well, if the prior art exists which shows the patent is invalid, I'm
> > personally satisfied that we can ship it, but this is actually the
> > purview of the ftp team to decide.
>
> Is this bug still being hel
This one time, at band camp, Rick Friedman said:
> Upon attempting to start the clamav daemon, an error occurs which causes
> the start to fail. Following is the error message that is displayed when
> /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon is run with the start parameter:
>
> Starting ClamAV daemon: clamd
> /s
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >When installing udev, it detects I am not running a 2.6.12 kernel
> > and the installation fails. This prevents the installation of all other
> > packages.
> This only happens when upgrading.
My bad. I meant upgrading, yes.
> >Please make t
Package: boost
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Trying to build the latest boost in pbuilder, it fails:
cat debian/documentation-files \
| xargs cp --parents
--target-directory=debian/libboost-doc/usr/share/doc/libboost-doc/HTML
cp: cannot stat `libs/regex/test/regress/index.html?D=A': No such
forward 322500 http://net-snmp.sf.net
tag + upstream
thanks
Hi,
unfortunately, simply changing the SONAME would make us incompatible
with the rest of the world. I reported the bug back upstream and hope
they will change the SONAME
upstream.
Thanks,
Jochen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321815: fixed in kazehakase 0.2.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Rick Friedman said:
>
>>Upon attempting to start the clamav daemon, an error occurs which causes
>>the start to fail. Following is the error message that is displayed when
>>/etc/init.d/clamav-daemon
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:43:51AM -0400, Rick Friedman said:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Rick Friedman said:
> >>
> >>Starting ClamAV daemon: clamd
> >>/sbin/start-stop-daemon:
> >>stat --oknodo: no such file or directory
> >>(No such file or directory)
> >>failed!
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 322500 http://net-snmp.sf.net
Bug#322500: libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://net-snmp.sf.net.
> tags 322500 + upstream
Bug#322500: libsnmp5: ABI change without SONAME change
Hello,
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 20:44 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Hi Adam (et al.),
>
> Sorry for not responding earlier but I've been travelling and quite
> busy and completely forgot about this issue. As I said, I don't know
> what the ideal situation is. The nice thing about the transition
On Aug 11, Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No it does not *have* to work this way. I read Jakob Bohm's proposal
> in #317332 (also backed by Manoj) and it seems to me like the perfect
> way to fix the problem.
Except for the detail that it does not work: the old version of udev
could n
The reason for the breakage is that something in the behaviour of
openssl has changed between versions 0.9.7e-3, which is part of Sarge,
and 0.9.7g-1 and newer.
This leads not only to an infinite loop at startup (which is fixed by at
least one of the submitted patches) but also to a problem dealin
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322564: fixed in clamav 0.86.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322583 grave
Bug#322583: uninstallable due to C++ transition
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Package: awstats
Version: 6.4-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch security
Hi!
awstats is vulnerable to a command injection flaw in crafted referer
URLs. Details are at:
http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=290&type=vulnerabilities
This is CAN-2005-1527, please mention it in the chang
John McCutchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: python2.3-crypto
> Followup-For: Bug #318055
>
> Bastian, Please just upload this now. I have had this bug open for
> almost a month without even a response from the maintainer. That is more
> than enough time for the maintainer to express inte
FYI, from the DSA about this security hole:
For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in
version 0.9.45-6.
But it seems that version was never uploaded.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 320656 libdjvulibre1
Bug#320656: evince: libdjvulibre.so.14 has gone
Bug reassigned from package `djvulibre' to `libdjvulibre1'.
> merge 320656 320582
Bug#320582: libdjvulibre1: soname of library changed
Bug#320656: evince: libdjvulibre.so.14
Greetings,
I'm afraid I'm just back from a couple of weeks out of the country and
with very limited email contact. During this time, my packages were
(rightfully) rejected from the NEW queue, and the 0-day NMU policy took
effect, under which you NMU-ed my packages. I had not foreseen this
change
Sorry, I seem to have typoed the assigned CVE for this hole. It's
CAN-2005-2347, not CAN-2005-2437. I'm sorry for the confusion and it
would be good if you could update your changelog in the next upload.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xmms-scrobbler
> Version: 0.3.8.1-3
> Severity: normal
>
> xmms-scrobbler needs to be recompiled against libmusicbrainz4c2.
> Currently, attempting to install it yields:
>
> The following packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 319562 - patch
Bug#319562: FTBFS: Labels at the end of compound statements
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tags 319562 - patch
thanks
Hi,
>
>
> Below there's a patch that corrects these problems and
> some others which came out later.
Yeap, fenris builds with the patch fine, but refuses to work:
[135]/home/robert/Debian/fenris/fenris> ./fenris ./fenris
fenris 0.07-m2 (3245, 23496) - program
Package: postfix
Version: 2.2.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi,
Postfix refuses to send any mail, according to its log:
Aug 11 19:34:12 vox postfix/master[3132]: warning:
/usr/lib/postfix/trivial-rewrite: bad command start
up -- throttling
Aug 11 19:35:12 vox
I would suggest emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] or filing a
bug against ftp.debian.org, since they handle /new.
Justin
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:37:00PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm afraid I'm just back from a couple of weeks out of the country and
> with very limited email con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 316173 -1
Bug#316173: SECURITY: HTTP proxy responses with both Transfer-Encoding and
Content-Length headers (CAN-2005-2088)
Bug 316173 cloned as bug 322607.
> clone 320048 -2
Bug#320048: SECURITY: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl (CAN-2005-1268)
Bu
Package: apache2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hello Apache maintainers,
please check if Debian is vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344 and make sure it
enters http://www.debian.org/security/crossreferences or the not-vulnerable
lists.
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1344
"Buf
Package: mmv
Version: 1.01b-12.1
Followup-For: Bug #322541
The hang part the submitter reported when running on i386 is probably
because of this:
Multiple from -- to pattern pairs may be specified by omitting
the pat‐ tern pair on the command line, and entering them on the
st
Package: apache
Severity: critical
Tags: security
thanks
Cloning did not work, so I open a new bug report. Reason was that
RedHat/Fedora also updated their 1.3.27 packages so this version
might also be vulnerable.
> > clone 320048 -2
> Bug#320048: SECURITY: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl (CAN-2005
Hi,
I just tested it, Enigma 0.92 builds without any problem with gcc 4.0.
Maybe this bug could/should be closed now ?
Regards,
Regis
--
"While a monkey can be a manager, it takes a human to be an engineer"
Erik Zapletal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Thanks, will do.
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 13:54 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I would suggest emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] or filing a
> bug against ftp.debian.org, since they handle /new.
> Justin
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:37:00PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm afraid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 322604 2.0.54-3
Bug#322604: SECURITY: Vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344?
Bug marked as not found in version 2.0.54-3.
> merge 307134 322604
Bug number 307134 not found.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
notfound 322604 2.0.54-3
merge 307134 322604
thanks
Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello Apache maintainers,
>
> please check if Debian is vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344 and make sure it
> enters http://www.debian.org/security/crossreferences or the not-vulnerable
> lists.
You can find a note that this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 318164 sid
Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
Package: zoo
Version: 2.10-14
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'zoo' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
debian/rules clean
debian/rules:34: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 322352 sarge
Bug#322352: pdns and pdns-doc both contain /usr/share/doc-base/pdns (sarge
security update version)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
>
End of message, stop
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:16:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322616: Acknowledgement (zoo: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
on 'dpatch')
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:17:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303692: fixed in sourcenav 5.1.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Adobe+macromedia+OS etc all in CD under $99
http://zrbnl.mt8jpl4f1wmbjnm.acarchformdc.info
Experience without learning is better than learning without experience.
Not life, but good life, is to be chiefly valued.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
This RC bug has the effect of blocking the security fix in the new
version in unstable from reaching testing. I think that's remote
security holes are generally considered more invonvenient than
functionlity decreases, so I suggest downgrading this bug.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description:
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#39: fixed in spkproxy 1.4.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
* Adam C Powell IV [Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:37:00 -0400]:
> Greetings,
Hi,
> I'm afraid I'm just back from a couple of weeks out of the country and
> with very limited email contact. During this time, my packages were
> (rightfully) rejected from the NEW queue, and the 0-day NMU policy took
> effec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 288189 + fixed
Bug#288189: xine-lib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in increment
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 315986 + fixed
Bug#315986: xine-lib: please build against libslang2
Tags were: patch
Bug#315868: libxine: please build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322600 grave
Bug#322600: evince: Application will not start
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 322600 320582
Bug#320582: libdjvulibre1: soname of library changed
Bug#322600: evince: Application will not start
Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6 c
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:17:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302608: fixed in siptoolbox 0.3.99rc2alpha3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 153736 + pending
Bug#153736: nethack: Successfully praying while swallowed should get me out
Tags were: wontfix
Tags added: pending
> tag 297626 + pending
Bug#297626: nethack: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): non-local variable ' key_macro []' uses anonymous
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318217: fixed in asterisk-oh323 0.6.6pre3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318189: fixed in asterisk-oh323 0.6.6pre3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 22:23 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Adam C Powell IV [Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:37:00 -0400]:
>
> > Greetings,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm afraid I'm just back from a couple of weeks out of the country and
> > with very limited email contact. During this time, my packages were
> > (righ
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320234: fixed in rt2500 1.1.0+cvs20050710-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320507: fixed in rt2400 1.2.2+cvs20050730-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Hi,
Please find attached a patch which should solve the problem. It's
untested on a 64bit machine however. Feel free to test and report the
result.
Thanks,
Peter (p2).
diff -ruN orig/opencv-0.9.6/tests/cv/src/apyramids.cpp
opencv-0.9.6/tests/cv/src/apyramids.cpp
--- orig/opencv-0.9.6/tests/cv/s
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:51:10PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > You should have contact me before working on this. I am preparing a
> > release of 2.5.28.1 which should close this bug.
>
> Well, you had been talking about a new release for quite some time, so I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> close 322604 2.0.54-3
Bug#322604: SECURITY: Vulnerable to CAN-2005-1344?
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.0.54-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Trying again now that use of closes/notfound has been clarified to me.
> close 274225 4:2.6.2-3
Bug#274225: Security patch in latest version affects woody?
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package openhackware
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: openhackware
> severity 322300 normal
Bug#322300: FTBFS: as: unrecognized option `-mregnames'
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 322300 openhackware: should not try to build on !powerpc environments
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297626: fixed in nethack 3.4.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:50:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288586: fixed in sword 1.5.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
package openhackware
severity 322300 normal
retitle 322300 openhackware: should not try to build on !powerpc environments
thanks
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:22:17AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Package: openhackware
> Version: 0.4.1-1
> Severity: Serious
> I tried to build openhackware on i386
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:53:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317389: fixed in libsigcx 0.6.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308711: fixed in nethack 3.4.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
