Package: qpopper-drac
Version: 4.0.5-4sarge1
Severity: critical
After I installed qpopper-drac on my sarge sever to use pop-before-smtp,
I tried to fecth mail with Mozilla Thunderbird.
Thunderbird showed following message.
> Failed to create /var/spool/pop/.username.pop with uid **, gid **
> Cha
Hi Andrew,
I tried installing f-spot on clean system (pbuilder environment) and it
runs without problems. Could you check f-spot in clean GNOME
environment:
1. create test user on your system
2. log-in as test user
3. run f-spot
If it helps then send me /tmp/f-spot.strace.txt file created by ru
Hello,
Very recently somebody filled a bug against on of my packages,
#313094.
In brief, the library soname changed without me realizing it, and the
package made in into the sarge release before anyone noticed. This
means that
a) (old) packages that linked with the old library won't work with th
Package: bash
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi. I recently upgraded to dpkg 1.13.9 and it appears that your
debian/rules line:
ARCH:= $(shell dpkg --print-gnu-build-architecture)
is failing due to the --print-gnu-build-architect
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:05:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311364: Acknowledgement (muine: wrong libdbus-cil
build-dep)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 308362
Bug number 308362 not found.
> severity 308362 serious
Bug number 308362 not found.
> tag 308362 sarge
Bug number 308362 not found.
> severity 313457 serious
Bug#313457: gnome-cpufreq-applet: package includes patches, but doesn't
actua
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On 6/13/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I will back this out as far as the Depends goes, but keep the
> > Build-Depends.
> >
> > I also reassign this back from r-base-dev.
> >
> > Chris: You should adjust the offending package
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:28:57PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Very recently somebody filled a bug against on of my packages,
> #313094.
> In brief, the library soname changed without me realizing it, and the
> package made in into the sarge release before anyone noticed. This
> means that
> a) (ol
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:55:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:56:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:57:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:55:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249443: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221597: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: nautilus-media
Version: 0.8.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: unstable
The package is removed when dist-upgrading. The solution is just depending
on libnautilus-extension1 instead of libnautilus2-2.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:48:17 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Are you still interested in maintaining debget? Is the patch supplied by
> Alexis to fix this RC bug satisfactory?
I really would like to get it fixed (I've been missing it more and more
lately), but I'm afraid the p
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221597: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226380: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251473: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:02:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302269: fixed in freetype 2.1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
> Why a predepends? Predepends are a special thing. Since it is in
> postinst, a Depends: should suffice.
You are correct (I was not aware of the difference).
--
bye,
pabs
http://pabs.zip.to
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 13:10 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
> The package is removed when dist-upgrading. The solution is just depending
> on libnautilus-extension1 instead of libnautilus2-2.
That doesn't work, these are not the same libraries. nautilus-media is
deprecated with GNOME 2.10 and should
On 14 June 2005 at 12:25, Santiago Vila wrote:
| On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Chris Lawrence wrote:
|
| > On 6/13/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > So I will back this out as far as the Depends goes, but keep the
| > > Build-Depends.
| > >
| > > I also reassign this back from r-base
Package: libgnomevfs2-common
Version: 2.10.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #313219
I have got a more or less the same BT, just that it's nautuils that crashes on
gnome boot.
libgnomevfs2-dbg doesn't help much in providing the debugging symbols of
libfile.so (where the crash starts). I apt-get source, compi
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:35:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome-menus: conflict with kdelibs-data
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 312213 critical
Bug#312213: initrd-tools: excessive amount of modules included in initrd
Severity set to `critical'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 13:10 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
>
> > The package is removed when dist-upgrading. The solution is just depending
> > on libnautilus-extension1 instead of libnautilus2-2.
>
> That doesn't work, these are not the same libraries.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:05:52PM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote:
> I have got a more or less the same BT, just that it's nautuils that crashes on
> gnome boot.
> libgnomevfs2-dbg doesn't help much in providing the debugging symbols of
> libfile.so (where the crash starts). I apt-get source, compiled with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 313375 important
Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig
Severity set to `important'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
severity 313375 important
stop
On June 13, 2005 12:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> So I tried the deb and yes it seems that creating the index is comletely
> broken. At least: khelpcenter tries to resolve all the help://XXX URL's
> via normal DNS, which is wrong, IMHO. I'll add another comment to the
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 14:07 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 13:10 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
>
> > The package is removed when dist-upgrading. The solution is just depending
> > on libnautilus-extension1 instead of libnautilus2-2.
>
> That doesn't work, these are not the
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.9
Severity: serious
dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary
unavailable in its original path. A package must not remove files from
another package. dpkg did this by placing a local diversion. This local
diversion does not (by definition) have
Le lundi 13 juin 2005 à 13:57 -0400, Tim Peeler a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 03:03:17PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 ? 16:20 -0400, Tim Peeler a ?crit :
> > > Could you double-check that version? Version 0.9.45-4 fixes this bug.
> > I'm positively sure about the
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:19:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a
local diversion
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Package: libpq3
Version: 7.4.8-8
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
This version of libpq3 looks for the server socket in /tmp, breaking
existing configurations and introducing a security problem.
$ strings -a /usr/lib/libpq.so.3 | grep tmp
SSL_CTX_set_verify_depth
S
Package: libapache-mod-security
Severity: grave
Justification: GPL conflicts with APL and makes binary undistributable
Version: 1.8.7-1
According to http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/libapache2-mod-security
the copyright file contains BSD style license. However the LICENSE file
clearly contai
Hi,
> Odd, when creating a simple sample program that calls posix_fadvise it works
> fine on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
Attached please find the source of my testing program. In fact, it
actually does:
int main()
{
int fd;
fd = open("a.c", 0);
posix_fadvise (fd, 0, 0, POSIX
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:48:38AM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote:
> Hi,
> > Odd, when creating a simple sample program that calls posix_fadvise it works
> > fine on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
> Attached please find the source of my testing program. In fact, it
> actually does:
>
> int main()
> {
>
> Right, very interesting.. Thanks for you debugging efforts! Lemme see if i can
> trace this back to the real cause :)
I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e.
gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a.c
and it crashes.
Cheers,
--
Ivan, Wong Yat Cheung <[EMAIL PR
> I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e.
>
> gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a.c
Look further, I think /usr/include/features.h gives some hints:
# ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
extern int posix_fadvise (int __fd, __off_t __offset, __off_t __len,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:24:11AM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote:
> > I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e.
> >
> > gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a.c
> Look further, I think /usr/include/features.h gives some hints:
>
> # ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
> extern int
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 07:51 -0700, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan a écrit :
> Do you think it's a good time to make Totem conflict with nautilus-media
> in the near future?
Why do you want to put a Conflict on totem?
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 313064 upstream
Bug#313064: bglibs: FTBFS: Segmentation fault during install.
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to upstream.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 313219 glibc
Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4
Bug reassigned from package `gnome-vfs2' to `glibc'.
> tag 313219 +fixed-in-experimental
Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Lin
reassign 313219 glibc
tag 313219 +fixed-in-experimental
thanks,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:11:39PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:24:11AM +0800, Ivan Wong wrote:
> > > I think I know why now. It's -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. i.e.
> > >
> > > gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 19:15 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 07:51 -0700, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan a écrit :
>
> > Do you think it's a good time to make Totem conflict with nautilus-media
> > in the near future?
>
> Why do you want to put a Conflict on totem?
Sebastien,
The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 313452 pending
Bug#313452: package is empty
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 313453 pending
Bug#313453: does not depend on libecpg5 (package missing?)
There we
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:02:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313475: fixed in gksu 1.2.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:59:47 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs against webmin 0.94
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 313605
Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
reopen 313605
thanks
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:19:20PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:57 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary
unavailable in its original path. A package must not remove files from
another p
Package: evolution
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Evolution crashes every time after upgrading. Even after reboot...
es menu class init
adding hook target 'source'
(evolution:8948): camel-WARNING **: Invalid root:
'/home/tamas/.evolution/mail/local/O
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:37:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313608: fixed in postgresql-7.4 1:7.4.8-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: zope2.7
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
uvw.ru:[/home/dimka]# umask
022
uvw.ru:[/home/dimka]# mkzope2.7instance
...
[skipped]
...
Directory: /tmp/testmkzope
...
[skipped]
uvw.ru:[/home/dimka]# ls -lR /tmp/testmkzope|grep inituser
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40 2005-06-
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 15:28 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:19:20PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> >On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:57 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> >> dpkg has made the md5sum.textutils binary from the coreutils binary
> >> unavailable in its original path.
Clearly we're not getting anywhere by filing bugs on each other's
packages and trading well-judged insults ...
Something has to provide /usr/bin/md5sum, your package (coreutils) has
the best implementation of that. If you also want to
provide /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils, that's your call.
Until yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 313644 + patch security
Bug#313644: zope2.7: Local security bug
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, security
> severity 313644 important
Bug#313644: zope2.7: Local security bug
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Package: brightside
Version: 1.3.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: 2.
libwnck4 is removed from the archives, and hence renders brightside
uninstallable.
In addition the program needs to be updated to comply with the
api-changes in libwnck > 2.10.
See attached patch for this.
chee
tags 313644 + patch security
severity 313644 important
thanks
Please try this patch:
--- /usr/lib/zope2.7/bin/mkzopeinstance.py.orig 2005-06-14 22:28:04.538426375
+0200
+++ /usr/lib/zope2.7/bin/mkzopeinstance.py 2005-06-14 22:23:28.145889036 +0200
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
print 'User/passw
Package: devilspie
Version: 0.8-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: 2.
libwnck4 is removed from the archives, and hence renders devilspie
uninstallable.
In addition the program needs to be updated to comply with the
api-changes in libwnck > 2.10.
See attached patch for this.
cheers,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 312213 important
Bug#312213: initrd-tools: excessive amount of modules included in initrd
Severity set to `important'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 313643 sid
Bug#313643: evolution: Evolution crashes after upgrading to 2.2.2-4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 313650 sid
Bug#313650: brightside: Uninstallable due to removed libwnck4 and doesn't build
with libwnck > 2.10
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping proce
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 313652 sid
Bug#313652: devilspie: Uninstallable due to removed libwnck4 and doesn't build
with libwnck > 2.10
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping proces
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:29:22PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Until your package is ready to provide md5sum itself, we need something
to make sure it's there -- we can't have a system without it. The
diversion has been working for the last six months, and seems to have
not upset anybody.
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:17:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313650: fixed in brightside 1.3.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
This is followup for your report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313067
The report looks like an issue with fonts not providing the "best" alias
to gs. Would you mind reporting against the packages with "bogus"
hints ?
Sorry i cannot make up a fix , as i learned defoma framewor
Hello Steve,
Now that you mention it, no, it's not part of sarge but is still part of
woody (since it works there). Too bad, it was a neat compiler.
Thanks.
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 21:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Since the cxx package is now unusable with current binutils, is t
Hi,
Just a note for the BTS: the libpq4 rebuild does not fix this problem
for me. Moreover, #313507 and #313602 suggest that I am not alone.
It appears that the postgresql maintainer will be fixing this problem in
libpq4 shortly, so watch this space.
b.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 10:43 -0700, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan a écrit :
> Is this needed or even necessary?
A Conflict is not correct, the packages don't have common files and can
be installed together.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.207-8
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
util-vserver failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder:
creating src/vhashify
depbase=`echo vserver-start/main.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`; \
if diet
Package: debootstrap
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: grave
/target/debootstrap # cat debootstrap.log
local: 352: apt-utils: bad variable name
/target/debootstrap #
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Archit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 313546 sid
Bug#313546: bash: FTBFS with new dpkg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 312847 + pending
Bug#312847: python-pgsql: Can't connect to UNIX socket with postgresql-7.4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 311328 + pending
Bug#311328: python-pgsql: Parsing of float values is not locale agnostic
Tags were: pat
tags 312847 + pending
tags 311328 + pending
thanks mate
Hi. Just a note that fixes for these bugs are ready to go, and will be
uploaded once libpq4 has fixed its unix socket locations (#313602).
b.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: drsync
Version: 0.4.3-6
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Tags: l10n
*** Please type your report below this line ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:
Folks,
I just discovered this bug report at bugs.debian.org. Sunday night
I did an apt-get upgrade; apt-get dist-upgrade on my Sid box. Gnome
is now utterly and completely broken. It starts up, and the gnome-panel
application begins to crash and restart repeatedly, popping up the "App
has
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:42:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changes merged in 2.2.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the full debugging trace . It looks like there is a
problem with a file:
#1 0x0804a330 in addline (buf=0xb3c0 "Couldn't find color
#00
in RGB database /usr/share/xwatch/rgb.txt", colindex=0)
could you sent /usr/share/xwatch/rgb.txt ?
This bug report raised the issue :
http://bugs.debian.org/313615
of an apache module (libapache-mod-security) being gpl while
using apache licenced headers .
I have checked the module source and it does not ship with its
own version of the apache headers.
It seems to me this is not an issue as
Your bug report :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313643
shows:
QPixmap: Invalid pixmap parameters
QPainter::begin: Cannot paint null pixmap
QPainter::setPen: Will be reset by begin()
QPainter::setBrush: Will be reset by begin()
QPainter::setBrush: Will be reset by begin()
QPaint
This is a followup for your report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=312525
Could you send the output of :
$ ldd /usr/lib/xmms/Output/libjackout.so
at least the version available on i386 does not depends on
xmms-dev to run (though it fails latter ).
I use xmms-jackasyn in the mea
Thank you for the full debugging trace . It looks like there is a
problem with a file:
> #1 0x0804a330 in addline (buf=0xb3c0 "Couldn't find color
> #00
> in RGB database /usr/share/xwatch/rgb.txt", colindex=0)
could you sent /usr/share/xwatch/rgb.txt ?
Also do you see "Couldn't find
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:17:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#312821: fixed in webcalendar 0.9.45-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:33:54 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed with release of sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: Quanta
Version: 3.3.2-6
Severity: Critical
This package has been broken for too many months, it crashes far too often
and there is nothing been done about resolving problems with it, is anyone
going to do something about it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:12:48 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314174: Quanta Unstable and unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
I raised this bug because there had been nothing added to the other bug,
I think I have been patient by waiting 120 days before raising this bug,
after all the first bug had nothing added to it.
If you had included your reply to this bug in that other bug then we all
would have known that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 313457 http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/06/msg00220.html
Bug#313457: gnome-cpufreq-applet: package includes patches, but doesn't
actually use them
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-
89 matches
Mail list logo
