Processed: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 262395 grave Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work

severity 262395 grave thanks The severity should be at least grave, as the upgrade breaks the system, and so that the bug can be seen by apt-listbugs, as said in bug #311425. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog:

Processed: tagging 311139

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 311139 sarge Bug#311139: kernel-image-2.4.27-s390: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-depends There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > End of message, stopping processing here. Plea

Bug#311439: crossfire: non-free file lib/adm/map_check

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, here is a proposed source package. http://kmuto.jp/debian/crossfire/ 7ea54b1ce30828e86d0695358f984665 crossfire_1.6.0.debian1-0.1.diff.gz 0d8a8b616651a5f9dd2b4dda0879ed3c crossfire_1.6.0.debian1-0.1.dsc 1f23f20c049a836b025da64500099f43 crossfi

Bug#308783: marked as done (libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:47:57 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308783: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#262395: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > This is a followup for your report: > http://bugs.debian.org/262395 > > The report end up with : >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.efmt installed. >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.efmt installed. >> fmtut

Bug#311482: apt-listbugs: Strange config file

Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.0.48 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 Apt-listbugs stores the bugs it just listed in /etc/apt/listbugs/ignore_bugs This results in a change in /etc after nearly every apt run which definitely sucks. Kind regards and thanks for maintaing a

Processed: tagging 311482

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 311482 sarge-ignore Bug#311482: apt-listbugs: Strange config file There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge-ignore > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#311488: somaplayer was built with a broken libmad0

Package: somaplayer Version: 0.5.2-2 Severity: serious somaplayer was built with a broken libmad0 on all archiectures (see #310311). This can lead to broken upgrades from woody. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#262395: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:34:39AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > This is a followup for your report: > > http://bugs.debian.org/262395 > > > > The report end up with : > >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.e

Bug#309677: Please reupload for i386/amd64 only

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:35:55PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > could you please "fix" this by uploading the latest version of asc with > the archs list trimmed down to i386 and amd64, the archs that seem > officially supported by upstream, to t-p-u? I'm not sure if it is possible to "fix" i

Bug#311488: Small correction to the description

It's an indirect upgrade issue, since somaplayer can be installed on a partially upgraded system with the woody libmad0. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise,"

Processed: tagging 262395, severity of 262395 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 262395 unreproducible Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work Tags were: sid sarge patch Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadete

Bug#311263: marked as done (woody to sarge upgrade trigger 34 useless dpkg conffiles handling)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 06:17:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311263: fixed in snort 2.3.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#311257: marked as done (snort: Files conflict with woody snort-common)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 06:17:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311257: fixed in snort 2.3.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#311492: zope-stripogram: Postinst script fails if zope2.7 is installed

Package: zope-stripogram Version: 1.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The postinst script assumes that there's a /etc/init.d/zope which is not there, since zope2.7 is installed: Setting up zope-stripogram (1.4-1) ... invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/zope not

Bug#306840: quagga: I_WANT_SSL does not --enable-snmp

Package: quagga Version: 0.98.3-7 Followup-For: Bug #306840 hi, debian/rules does only insert an extra backslash when I_WANT_SSL=yes is set. Maybe this is due to wrong syntax ? Copied the way mysql does it and it works. Heres a patch. Cheers, Christoph [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ diff qua

Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I believe a failure to upgrade while udev is installed is serious. > Please lower again (and sorry for bothering the busy release team then) > if I am for some reason mistaken. I agree that this is an RC bug, and I've just uploa

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mdadm 1.9.0-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 299623 + fixed Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente) wrote: > Package: fp-compiler > Version: 2.0.0-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > Setting up fp-compiler (2.0.0-2) ... > update-alternatives: slave link name /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz dupl

Bug#311436: alternatives broken

I also just got this when upgrading and it turned out that my /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/pc file was somehow broken. I purged fp-compiler and deleted the file, and reinstalling now worked (I have no other pc installed at all!) This was the contents of the file: auto /usr/bin/pc fpc.1.gz /usr/share

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

hi I am sending this mail to many recipients since I need help - On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Package: lpr-ppd > Severity: grave > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But > a

Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

(Sending this from work, so sorry for breaking thread and I have now idea how formatting will turn out...) -if [ ! -e /dev/.devfsd ] && [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then +if [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then I wonder if this change is correct for a udev fix. IIRC "-e /dev/.devfsd" checks for _devfsd_, not ude

Processed: Re: fp-compiler: Error installing package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 311436 patch Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package

tag 311436 patch thanks On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:00PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente) > wrote: > > Package: fp-compiler > > Version: 2.0.0-2 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > Set

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > > Package: lpr-ppd > > Severity: grave > > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > > > Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But > > a

Bug#310982: smbfs: bad interaction between uid= and CAP_UNIX, need advice for Debian sarge

Hi folks, Andrew Bartlett and I have been having a spirited discussion[1] about a bug report from a Debian user(/developer) that the semantics of smbfs silently change when upgrading to the latest Linux 2.4 kernels. Because smbfs now understands CAP_UNIX, the uid=, gid=, fmask=, dmask= mount opti

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

maybe this problem may be mentioned in the Sarge release notes ? On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:46:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > > any suggestions? > > I don't see any reason to worry about it; I think it was a bug for lpr-ppd >

Bug#311263: Adjusting distribution

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:03:00PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > reopen 311263 > tags 311263 = sarge > reopen 311257 > tags 311257 = sarge > thanks > > Since new packages have been pushed to sid I'm tagging these bugs 'sarge' > only. I've done upgrade tests from the woody (1.8)

Bug#311188: Possible compromise...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31-05-2005 08:08, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote: > Alex Owen wrote: > >>Could we not come to a working compromise for sarge no the basis that a >>propper solution is found for etch... something along the lines of this. >> >>debian-edu-config could use d

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:20:09PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > maybe this problem may be mentioned in the Sarge release notes ? Please contact debian-doc@lists.debian.org about adding it to the release notes if you think it should be mentioned. IMHO, it seems like a minor issue; I don't think the r

Bug#295221: marked as done (twiki: Twiki should depend on libtext-diff-perl and not provide these files)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:08:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 295221 already fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

* A Mennucc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050601 13:38]: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > > Package: lpr-ppd > > Severity: grave > > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > > > Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng should be a breeze, I read somewhere. But > > after the ch

Bug#311514: Package: kopete 3.3.2-5 crash

Package: kopete Version: 3.3.2-5 Severity: grave Debian version: Sarge Kernel: 2.6.11.7 When I tried to login to my MSN account kopete crashed instantly. I'm behind a firewall. Kopete useless as an IM for MSN behind a firewall. I clicked the kopete crash handler. Here's the backtrace: (no debug

Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package

2005/6/1, Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:04:21AM -0300, Guilherme Mesquita Gondim (semente) > wrote: > > Setting up fp-compiler (2.0.0-2) ... > > update-alternatives: slave link name /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz duplicated > > dpkg: error processing fp-compiler (--

Processed: Re: gnupg-doc: FTBFS: db2any: error: jadetex not found

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310763 + patch Bug#310763: gnupg-doc: FTBFS: db2any: error: jadetex not found There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#311436: fp-compiler: Error installing package

Em Qua, 2005-06-01 às 13:15 +0900, Kenshi Muto escreveu: > Guilherme, what's status of your /usr/share/man/man1/pc.1.gz? > Could you check by ls -l and dpkg -S? If it points symlink, please > check referred file also. I dont speak english, ok? Spanish? Sigue lo que pidió: $ ls -l /usr/share/man

Bug#311514: This bug is not grave

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: kopete Version: 3.3.2-5 Severity: normal Hi Krisztian, this is no grave bug, since grace mean: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing acces

Processed: kopete severity downgrade

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 311514 important Bug#311514: Package: kopete 3.3.2-5 crash Severity set to `important'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#310763: gnupg-doc: FTBFS: db2any: error: jadetex not found

tags 310763 + patch thanks Hi, A complete patch is attached to fix the build problems. Although the changelog says I've NMU'd it, I haven't uploaded it yet, since I thought you might prefer to check it yourself. If you like, I can NMU it. I'd just like to note that the bulk of the diff was the

Bug#311439: crossfire: non-free file lib/adm/map_check

On Wed, 01 Jun 2005, Kenshi Muto wrote: > Hi, > > here is a proposed source package. Hi, Kari is preparing the upload and I am going to sponsor it if needed. --j -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 04:46 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek: > The simple answer is "well, don't > purge packages without looking at the conffile list!". Are you serious? You want the users to always look at the conffile list, just in case the package has declared the wrong file at its conffil

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 04:46 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > The simple answer is "well, don't > > purge packages without looking at the conffile list!". > Are you serious? You want the users to always look at the conffile l

Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package

Package: nagios-common Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable >From nagios-common's postrm: | rm -Rf {/var/cache,/var/run,/var/log,/etc}/nagios Removing /etc/nagios is a _bad_ idea, especially when you still have other nagios related packages like nagios-nrpe-server installed.

Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.01.1317 +0200]: > -if [ ! -e /dev/.devfsd ] && [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then > +if [ ! -e /dev/md0 ] ; then > > I wonder if this change is correct for a udev fix. I do not have the mental capacity after this day to judge it, but vorlon took ca

Bug#310311: NMU fixed

Hey guys, Sorry for the 0 hour nmu I just uploaded, but I needed this in unstable ASAP to try to get a fixed somaplayer compiled, and this one is targetted for sarge. Attached is the nmu diff, just added the shlibs thingy for cdbs. Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://w

Bug#310763: marked as done (gnupg-doc: FTBFS: db2any: error: jadetex not found)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:32:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310763: fixed in gnupg-doc 2003.04.06-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libmad 0.15.1b-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 310311 + fixed Bug#310311: lost versioned shlibs in new version Tags were: pending sid Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Processed: Re: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 311526 confirmed sarge sid Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, sarge, sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#311526: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package

tags 311526 confirmed sarge sid thanks On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:06:24PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > Package: nagios-common > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > From nagios-common's postrm: > > | rm -Rf {/var/cache,/var/run,/var/log,/etc}/nagios > > Removing /

Bug#310982: smbfs: bad interaction between uid= and CAP_UNIX, need advice for Debian sarge

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:14:29AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi folks, > > Andrew Bartlett and I have been having a spirited discussion[1] about a > bug report from a Debian user(/developer) that the semantics of smbfs > silently change when upgrading to the latest Linux 2.4 kernels. Because

Bug#310763: jade problem with gnupg-doc (#310763)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On May 30, Neil Roeth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On May 30, Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > [gnupg-doc] > > > > I'm not hav

Processed: libid3tag: lost shlibs on coversion to cdbs.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 310311 -1 Bug#310311: lost versioned shlibs in new version Bug 310311 cloned as bug 311544. > reassign -1 libid3tag Bug#311544: lost versioned shlibs in new version Bug reassigned from package `libmad' to `libid3tag'. > tags -1 = sid pending Bug

Processed: Fixed in NMU of crossfire 1.6.0.dfsg.1-4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 311439 + fixed Bug#311439: crossfire: non-free file lib/adm/map_check There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Processed: tagging 311439, tagging 311439

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 311439 - fixed Bug#311439: crossfire: non-free file lib/adm/map_check Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed > #This bug still affects sarge, as the fixed package is only in sid

Bug#311544: marked as done (lost versioned shlibs in new version)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:47:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311544: fixed in libid3tag 0.15.1b-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: Tagging with 'patch'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 307103 + patch Bug#307103: clara: segmentation fault at startup Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Bug#307103: Tagging with 'patch'

tag 307103 + patch thanks Hi, Thank you very much for your feedback. Since we have a working patch for this bug, I'm tagging it. CCing to -release as they may want to consider a fixed 'clara' for Sarge. I've prepared an NMUed package for their convenience: http://l10n-turkish.alioth.debian.or

Bug#311397: same trace in english

debian:~# env LANG=C apt-get install libcommoncpp2-1.3 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libcommoncpp2-1.3 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 72 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 226kB

Bug#311397: resolved on my PC

With : apt-get remove libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102 I don't have the problem anymore. I don't know where this version of the package comes from ??? For me, you can close the bug if I was the only one having the problem on the planet. Regards Stephane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Bug#311563: qt dialog windows are invisible on debian amd64 with windowmaker

Package: wmaker Version: 0.91.0-7.2 Severity: grave Hello, there is no dialog window of any qt-application opening visible with windowmaker. I've testet licq, qtparted, k3b and the kernel build configurator "make xconfig". It's always reproducable and makes qt-applications useless with wmaker. T

Processed: Merge postinst failure

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 306595 311557 Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex Bug#311557: xmltex fails to install Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `severity' don't match: #306595 has `important'; #311557 has `grave'

Processed: tagging 311557

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 311557 sid Bug#311557: xmltex fails to install There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Bug#311557: appears to be present in 1.9-9 (sid) only

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude install xmltex Password: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done The following NEW packages will be automatically installed: passivetex The fo

Bug#311557: xmltex fails to install

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing > *** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.h656Jr for details Please can you send this file as an attachment. Thanks, Roger - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforg

Bug#308879: tinyca: another patch

Hi, I was being troubled by the same bug, and was able to solve it some time ago using the following quick & dirty patch: --- OpenSSL.pm 2005-02-20 22:03:03.0 +0100 +++ OpenSSL.pm~ 2005-05-17 12:28:37.0 +0200 @@ -827,8 +827,8 @@ $ret = $?>>8; if(($ret != 0 && $opts->{'c

Processed: Merge related

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 306595 311557 Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex Bug#311557: xmltex fails to install Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work Merged 262395 306595 311557. > thanks Stopping process

Processed: Issues that only affect amd64 are at most severity important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 311563 important Bug#311563: qt dialog windows are invisible on debian amd64 with windowmaker Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: important -> grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package slapd Ignoring bugs not assigned to: slapd > tags 311491 sarge Bug#311491: slapd stops functioning almost completely if a CPU consuming process runs at the same time There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > severity 311491 grave Bug#311491

Bug#311563: Issues that only affect amd64 are at most severity important

severity 311563 important thanks Issues that only affect amd64 (which is not part of an official Debian release) are at most severity important. Don Armstrong -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond

Bug#311149: marked as done (libcommoncpp2: FTBFS: dh_installdocs: cp: cannot stat `doc/html': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:32:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311149: fixed in libcommoncpp2 1.3.10-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#311397: marked as done (libcommoncpp2-1.3: impossible to install the package)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:32:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311397: fixed in libcommoncpp2 1.3.10-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#311572: linuxsampler: ftbfs [sparc] aclocal: Command not found

Package: linuxsampler Version: 0.3.cvs20050531-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source linuxsampler fails to build from source on sparc and other buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. /usr/bin/make -f Make

Bug#311575: rt2500: ftbfs [sparc] dh_testdir: Command not found

Package: rt2500 Version: 1.1.0+cvs20050530-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source rt2500 fails to build from source on sparc and all other buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is sparc /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean dh

Processed: Re: Removed mysql-nonfree, mysql-nonfree-4.1 from unstable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 308680 Bug#308680: RM: mysql-nonfree,mysql-nonfree-4.1 -- RoM; undistributeable Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#308680: Removed mysql-nonfree, mysql-nonfree-4.1 from unstable

reopen 308680 thanks On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:47:29PM -0400, Debian Archive Maintenance wrote: > We believe that the request you reported is now fixed; the following > package(s) have been removed from unstable: > > mysql-doc | 4.0.24-1 | all > mysql-doc-4.1 | 4.1.10a-1 | all > mysql-nonfre

Processed: tagging 311491, severity of 311491 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 311491 - sarge Bug#311491: slapd stops functioning almost completely if a CPU consuming process runs at the same time Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge > severity 311491 imp

Bug#311557: appears to be present in 1.9-9 (sid) only

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:21:31PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude install xmltex > Password: > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree > Reading extended state information > Initializing package states... Done > Reading task descriptions... Done >

Bug#311557: patch to fix this by checking to see whether efmt or fmt is supposed to be made

The following rather trivial patch seems to clear up this issue here. [Someone better at shell could probably make it slightly cleaner... just thank $DEITY that I didn't decide to write it in perl. ;-)] The basic idea is just to see if fmtutil is going to make an efmt or fmt, and then check for th

Bug#311344: Replacing lpr-ppd with lprng removes printer database

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:15:37PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > /etc/printcap is a "conffile" of lpr-ppd ; if > lpr-ppd is removed, /etc/printcap will still be there ; > but if you purge lpr-ppd , dpkg will delete /etc/printcap , > since it is not a conffile of lprng lprng used to have /etc/printca

Bug#311557: (no subject)

Eugene Konev reminded me (in #debian-bugs) that a fix is needed to the postrm as well. Since kpsewhich can return both fmt and efmt, the trivial thing is to look for both: # remove fmt and efmt files XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsew

Processed: Re: Bug#311570: ipkungfu: seems to miss configuration files and executable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 311570 grave Bug#311570: ipkungfu: seems to miss configuration files and executable Severity set to `grave'. > tags 311570 = confirmed sid Bug#311570: ipkungfu: seems to miss configuration files and executable There were no tags set. Tags set

Bug#311526: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#311526: nagios-common: purging package removed configuration files from another package

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:19:26PM -0400, sean finney wrote: > tags 311526 confirmed sarge sid > thanks > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:06:24PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > Package: nagios-common > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > From nagios-common's pos

Bug#262395: and yet another minor issue

Yet another minor issue, which I found because I had both xmltex.emft and xmltex.fmt laying about... (probably pathological, but trivial to fix): XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt pdfxmltex.fmt) || true LOGDIR=$(d

Bug#244382: marked as done (setools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2005 01:06:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This has been fixed for a while has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#279726: marked as done (CAN-2003-0541: null pointer dereference security hole)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:21:32 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line #279726: CAN-2003-0541: null pointer dereference security hole has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#311397: resolved on my PC

Thanks Stephane, It was a subtle problem, which I was aware of before I uploaded the package. Originally the package was called libcommoncpp2-1.0-0c102, but the soname changed (which I didn't notice) and uploaded libcomoncpp2-1.0-0c102 (1.3.10-1). Since the soname had changed I needed to renam

Bug#311557: appears to be present in 1.9-9 (sid) only

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:01:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Well, this bug is now merged with 262395, but they seem to be opposite sides > of the same bugfix; the dependency on efmt is a result of the changes in > 1.9-9 that were supposed to fix 262395/306595. > > I don't really know anythin

Bug#311482: marked as done (apt-listbugs: Strange config file)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:17:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311482: fixed in apt-listbugs 0.0.49 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no