On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:21:31PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude install xmltex > Password: > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree > Reading extended state information > Initializing package states... Done > Reading task descriptions... Done > The following NEW packages will be automatically installed: > passivetex > The following packages have been kept back: > libpq3 postgresql postgresql-client > The following NEW packages will be installed: > passivetex xmltex > 0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. > Need to get 559kB of archives. After unpacking 1343kB will be used. > Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] Y > Writing extended state information... Done > Get:1 http://debian.usc.edu unstable/main xmltex 1.9-8 [196kB] > Get:2 http://debian.usc.edu unstable/main passivetex 1.25-2 [363kB] > Fetched 559kB in 0s (2277kB/s) > Selecting previously deselected package xmltex. > (Reading database ... 120566 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking xmltex (from .../archives/xmltex_1.9-8_all.deb) ... > Selecting previously deselected package passivetex. > Unpacking passivetex (from .../passivetex_1.25-2_all.deb) ... > Setting up xmltex (1.9-8) ... > Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version > texhash: Updating /home/don/texmf/ls-R... > texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R... > texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R... > texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... > texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN... > texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R... > texhash: Done. > Checking for TeX format files we depend on ... done. > Creating xmltex format files... > fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/xmltex.fmt installed. > fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfxmltex.fmt installed. > Done. > texhash: Updating /home/don/texmf/ls-R... > texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R... > texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R... > texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... > texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN... > texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R... > texhash: Done. > > Setting up passivetex (1.25-2) ... > Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version > > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree > Reading extended state information > Initializing package states... Done > Reading task descriptions... Done
Well, this bug is now merged with 262395, but they seem to be opposite sides of the same bugfix; the dependency on efmt is a result of the changes in 1.9-9 that were supposed to fix 262395/306595. I don't really know anything about fmtutil (other than that it's a chronic RC irritant). What's the variable here that causes some systems to need .fmt and some to need .efmt? It doesn't seem to be the version of tetex packages installed, at least. Supposing for the moment we're out of time before release, which version would we want to go with -- the 1.9-8 version that assumes .fmt, or the 1.9-9 version that assumes .efmt? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
