Bug#310352: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: cannot reboot after upgrade

Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7 Version: 2.6.11-5 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system after an apt-get upgrade four of my servers didn't reboot, message on the screen is : "kernel can not convert a name into device number" /sbin/init 360 cannot.. -- System Information

Processed: Re: Bug#309838: gcompris: missing dependency on python2.3-gnome2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309848 important Bug#309848: gcompris: key-events fix backported to sarge Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debi

Bug#309838: gcompris: missing dependency on python2.3-gnome2

severity 309848 important thanks Yann, On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:37:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:36:26AM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > > > None of the boards written in python work without python-gnome. Only > > > this dependency is missing. > > Currently buildi

Processed: reassign 310352 to initrd-tools, severity of 310352 is grave, merging 310352 310316

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 310352 initrd-tools Bug#310352: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: cannot reboot after upgrade Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7' to `initrd-tools'. > severity 31

Bug#310368: mdadm: breaks during apt-get dist-upgrade

Package: mdadm Version: 1.9.0-2.3 Severity: critical Tags: experimental Justification: breaks the whole system running debian unstable apt-get dist-upgrade: Setting up mdadm (1.9.0-2.3) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid ... update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid exists

Bug#310368: mdadm: breaks during apt-get dist-upgrade

Danny, On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:03:09AM +0200, dth wrote: > Package: mdadm > Version: 1.9.0-2.3 > Severity: critical > Tags: experimental > Justification: breaks the whole system > running debian unstable apt-get dist-upgrade: > Setting up mdadm (1.9.0-2.3) ... > Installing new version of conf

Processed: Fixed in upload of ikvm 0.14.0.1-2 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 310300 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#310300: ikvm: FTBFS in experimental: Only has Build-Depends-Indep, and changed to arch any package. Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#310368: mdadm: breaks during apt-get dist-upgrade

tags 310368 = moreinfo unreproducible severity 310368 important thanks Danny, On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:03:09AM +0200, dth wrote: > running debian unstable apt-get dist-upgrade: > Setting up mdadm (1.9.0-2.3) ... > Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid ... > update-rc.d:

Processed: Re: Bug#310368: mdadm: breaks during apt-get dist-upgrade

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310368 = moreinfo unreproducible Bug#310368: mdadm: breaks during apt-get dist-upgrade Tags were: experimental Tags set to: moreinfo, unreproducible > severity 310368 important Bug#310368: mdadm: breaks during apt-get dist-upgrade Severity set to

Bug#310368: mdadm: breaks during apt-get dist-upgrade

Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Can you tell us what version of mdadm you had installed prior to this? nope, sorry it's a pitty that apt/dpkg doesn't write this info to a log file ! I couldn't scroll back for enough! -- 4 questions of life: What is sacred? What is the spirit mad

Bug#310286: releaseforge: I can confirm #310286

Package: releaseforge Version: 0.7.1-2 Followup-For: Bug #310286 Same problem as in #310286. Uwe -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.

Bug#309648: Should we reopen the bug?

#309648 appears as fixed while the bug is still in sarge. sarge being frozen, the bug does *not* appear as RC (http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/debian/all.html). I believe we should reopen the bug (with its current tags, including "sarge"). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Bug#309321: approx: Approx stops processing TCP rx queue

Thanks Eric, As you predicted the "104 Connection Reset" errors seem to have gone with the pipelining workaround. The original problem however persists, but at least one possible culprit has been eliminated. Tim #

Bug#310318: "wget -N" reports "File already exists"

I cannot repeat this bug. I also cannot find this error message ("File already exists") in Wget source code, nor in the Debian patch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of bzip2 1.0.2-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 303300 + fixed Bug#303300: file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953) Tags were: woody security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#254122: testing

Am / On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:51:25 +0400 (MSD) schrieb "Al Nikolov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In fact, "Create Image" creates image (a file on harddisk) first, then > simply runs "Burn CD" sequence. Have you got the file? There was no iso-file created! > I don't understand clearly: is the original c

Bug#310050: advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

The fluxbox in woody, 0.1.7-3 diverts /usr/bin/bsetbg to /usr/bin/bsetbg.blackbox, but it only removes those diversions in postrm/remove. Installing and deinstalling this package works fine, with or without blackbox installed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# dpkg -l fluxbox | grep ^ii ii fluxbox

Bug#310328: not grave

I really don't think this is a grave bug. Enigmail works fine with gnupg 1.4.1. If you leave something as complex as thunderbird running while you upgrade the software, you are asking for trouble. Anyway, < vorlon> of course it's grave, no software should be corrupting your data just because it'

Bug#310050: advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:52:17PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > For further fun (and to see the exact bug that libldap2 was tripping > > across), remove blackbox and then un-divert (by hand, in this case) bsetbg. > > You get a nice little file named /usr/bin/bsetbg, which dpkg knows nothing >

Bug#310050: hacked postinst

The attached postinst allows fluxbox to install together with blackbox, and it nukes the files left behind by dpkg (see also #309485, #310390). Also, this hack has to happen in postinst/configure as there is no postinst/upgrade. It checks $2, which is empty on fresh installs and contains the previo

Bug#309485: dpkg bug

fyi: #310390 -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "i might disagree with what yo

Bug#254122: testing

Have you looking at bugs #288550, #277051? It's probably yours situation. -- Regards, Al Nikolov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Please remove source packages mysql-nonfree and mysql-nonfree-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 308680 ftp.debian.org Bug#308680: License does not permit redistribution Bug reassigned from package `mysql-nonfree-4.1' to `ftp.debian.org'. > severity 308680 serious Bug#308680: License does not permit redistribution Severity set to `serious

Bug#310318: "wget -N" reports "File already exists"

Max Alekseyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hrvoje Niksic wrote: >> I cannot repeat this bug. I also cannot find this error message >> ("File already exists") in Wget source code, nor in the Debian patch. > > $ apt-get source wget > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done

Bug#309485: advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:51:29AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > The fluxbox in woody, 0.1.7-3 diverts /usr/bin/bsetbg to > /usr/bin/bsetbg.blackbox, but it only removes those diversions in > postrm/remove. Installing and deinstalling this package works fine, > with or without blackbox installed:

Bug#309760: Now a real fix

Attached is the patch which fixes a problem with gaim. It properly sanitizes all input from xserver events. BTW, woody version of xlockmore also has the same problem. The patch applies to it, though with some fuzziness. Looking through diff between woody and sarge versions I couldn't see any oth

Bug#310198: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0

On 22 May 2005 at 22:33, Don Armstrong wrote: | clone 310198 -1 | severity -1 wishlist | reassign -1 r-base-core | retitle -1 please distribute Startup.h from src/include/Startup.h in /usr/lib/R/include/ | tag -1 = | submitter -1 ! | thanks | | | On Sun, 22 May 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: |

Bug#264839: marked as done (initrd-tools: mkinitrd should include keyboard modules (i8042, atkbd) in case an early fsck interaction is needed)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 03:38:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU of initrd-tools 0.1.80 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: tagging 310050

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 310050 + patch Bug#310050: leaves stray diversions around There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Processed: reopening 309648, tagging 309648

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reopen 309648 Bug#309648: Cheetah loads arbitrary code from /tmp Bug reopened, originator not changed. > # as there are questions about the unstable version, lets reopen this for no

Bug#310249: marked as done (util-vserver: Error upgrade)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 07:02:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310249: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.204-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#310318: "wget -N" reports "File already exists"

Hrvoje Niksic wrote: I cannot repeat this bug. I also cannot find this error message ("File already exists") in Wget source code, nor in the Debian patch. $ apt-get source wget Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Need to get 1341kB of source archives. Get:1 ftp://f

Bug#310050: advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1229 +0200]: > Meh. This definitely looks like a dpkg bug, and it also explains > how bug #309485 got to be the way it was. Well, at least we have > an explanation now. #310390 > > A problem arises (#310050) when 0.9.11-* is used to upg

Bug#310050: advice sought for fluxbox (release-critical, possible dpkg bug)

also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1301 +0200]: > > Looks good to me. > > I meant, do this with a version of fluxbox installed that no > longer provides /usr/bin/bsetbg. Isn't that just another incarnation of the dpkg bug? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me;

Processed: Fixed in upload of solfege 2.4.1-2 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 310302 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#310302: solfege: FTBFS in experimental: Missing build dependencies. Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#310286: releaseforge: I can confirm #310286

Uwe Steinmann wrote: > Package: releaseforge > Version: 0.7.1-2 > Followup-For: Bug #310286 > > > Same problem as in #310286. > > Uwe Thanks for the confirmation. There is already a new version in incoming that fixes this. I got bit by the incompatibility between pyqt-tools 3.13 and 3.14.1.

Processed: cloning 308680, reassign -1 to mysql-nonfree, reassign -2 to mysql-nonfree-4.1, tagging 308680 ... ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > clone 308680 -1 -2 Bug#308680: "Please remove mysql-nonfree(-4.1) -- RoM" Bug 308680 cloned as bugs 310406-310407. > reassign -1 mysql-nonfree Bug#310406: "Please remove mysql-nonfre

Processed: cloning 308680, retitle -1 to RM: mysql-nonfree/woody -- RoM; License does not permit redistribution ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > clone 308680 -1 Bug#308680: "Please remove mysql-nonfree(-4.1) -- RoM" Bug 308680 cloned as bug 310408. > retitle -1 RM: mysql-nonfree/woody -- RoM; License does not permit > redist

Processed: tagging 309760

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309760 + patch Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop Tags were: security confirmed Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing he

Bug#310328: not grave

also sprach Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1417 +0200]: > Unfortunately, it was about 1:30 am when I figured this all out. > The problem is that there were extra files in ~/.gnupg, including > a lock file and what appeared to be a temp file for modifications > to the public keyr

Bug#310328: not grave

martin f krafft wrote: > I really don't think this is a grave bug. Enigmail works fine with > gnupg 1.4.1. If you leave something as complex as thunderbird > running while you upgrade the software, you are asking for trouble. > > Anyway, > > < vorlon> of course it's grave, no software should be

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xlockmore 1:5.13-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 309760 + fixed Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop Tags were: patch security confirmed Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Processed: #309135 not serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package john Ignoring bugs not assigned to: john > severity 309135 important Bug#309135: john: FTBFS in experimental: undefined reference to `options' Severity set to `important'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#310412: mdadm refuses to start up on boot due to config file version problem

Package: mdadm Version: 1.9.0-2.3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After moving to the latest version of mdadm, and kernel 2.6.11-1-k7 (2.6.11-5), I was unable to reboot my system. I was able to fix this problem by changing the symbols I use to represent my RAID arrays.

Bug#309760: Please approve xlockmore_1:5.13-2.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear, I NMUed xlockmore 1:5.13-2.1 to fix RC #309760. I checked Eugene's patch solved this bug. Could you accept this for Sarge? Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 11:30:18 + Source: xlockmore Binary: xlockmore xlockmore-gl Architecture: source

Bug#310050: hacked postinst

If fluxbox is upgraded before blackbox, the undocumented.7 symlink used by blackbox gets in the way of the -f check. The following patch should fix that: --- fluxbox.postinst.orig 2005-05-23 15:04:25.659968235 +0200 +++ fluxbox.postinst 2005-05-23 15:04:41.376293132 +0200 @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ f

Processed: severity of 309135 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 309135 serious Bug#309135: john: FTBFS in experimental: undefined reference to `options' Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please conta

Bug#310328: Bug #310328,Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem

tags 310328 + unreproducible thanks Hey guys, how about adding me to CC when reassigning and escalating a bug to RC on my package? Anyway, Roberto. Please post ASAP if you can reproduce this bug somehow. I couldn't reproduce this problem here. IMHO, if the .gnupg dir got corrupted somehow, then

Bug#310420: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: does not boot (fails in init) after upgrading from 2.6.11-3

Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686 Version: 2.6.11-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I upgraded from 2.6.11-3 to 2.6.11-5 (dist-upgrade) and the kernel fails to boot with error messages indicating that a few files cannot be found. The transcripts of upgrade sessions and th

Processed: Bug #310328,Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310328 + unreproducible Bug#310328: Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Processed: reassign 310420 to initrd-tools, merging 310316 310420

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 310420 initrd-tools Bug#310420: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: does not boot (fails in init) after upgrading from 2.6.11-3 Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686

Bug#310328: Bug #310328,Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem

also sprach Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1521 +0200]: > Hey guys, how about adding me to CC when reassigning and > escalating a bug to RC on my package? Uh, don't you get BTS mail as the maintainer? One thing that just occurred to me: neither thunderbird nor enigmail were in woo

Bug#310420: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: does not boot (fails in init) after upgrading from 2.6.11-3

On 05/05/23 18:49 +0530, Giridhar - Debian said ... > > [snip] > hda: Host Protected Area disabled. > hda: 78156288 sectors (40016 MB) w/1821KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63, UDMA(100) > /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 p2 p3 p4 < p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 p11 p12 > p13 p14 p15 > > Kernel can not convert

Bug#310420: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: does not boot (fails in init) after upgrading from 2.6.11-3)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 10:02:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310316: fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.81 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#310316: marked as done (initrd-tools)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 10:02:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310316: fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.81 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#310328: Bug #310328,Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem

martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1521 +0200]: > >>Hey guys, how about adding me to CC when reassigning and >>escalating a bug to RC on my package? > > > Uh, don't you get BTS mail as the maintainer? > I only got a Processed: message of the reas

Bug#309648: Should we reopen the bug?

reopen 309648 = thanks Absolutely. It should be reopened for sarge. I should not have put the "Closed:" line in the changelog. -- Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Bug#310328: Bug #310328,Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem

also sprach Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1606 +0200]: > upgrading the gnupg binary. If we have luck, the gpg operation > will fail/break/segfault/stall or something and keep a tmp file > inside the .gnupg directory. Your definition of "luck" is completely bananas. This would *su

Bug#267585: marked as done (Don't ship it with sarge)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 16:09:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line sarge is frozen has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#310352: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7: cannot reboot after upgrade)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 10:02:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310316: fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.81 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:40:11AM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote: > After experimenting with different kinds of slapd database corrution on > 2.2.23 I've found out that this behavior is hapenning then db > environment files (/var/lib/ldap/__db.00[1-5]) are missing or severely > corrupted. > ltracing s

Bug#310412: mdadm refuses to start up on boot due to config file version problem

Hi Moshe, On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:51:29AM -0500, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote: > Package: mdadm > Version: 1.9.0-2.3 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > After moving to the latest version of mdadm, and kernel 2.6.11-1-k7 > (2.6.11-5), I was unable to reboot my system. I

Bug#309982: marked as done (Multiple buffer overflows in picasm)

Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 11:02:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309982: fixed in picasm 1.12c-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Re: Bug #310328,Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 310328 gnupg Bug#310328: Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem Bug reassigned from package `mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail' to `gnupg'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#310328: Bug #310328,Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem

reassign 310328 gnupg thanks after some thinking and a short discussion on IRC, I think it is safe to move this back to gnupg again. enigmail only calls the /usr/bin/gpg binary and in consequence should not be able to be responsible for a corruption of the .gnupg directory. It is still unclear whe

Processed: more info

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310412 + moreinfo Bug#310412: mdadm refuses to start up on boot due to config file version problem There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Bug#310412: more info

tags 310412 + moreinfo thanks Hi Moshe, could you please give us the complete output of ls -l /dev/md* Also note that the initrd uses /devfs/md/3, not /dev/md/3. Please provide more information about the exact errors and when they happen during the boot stage. You may find `dmesg` useful, an

Bug#310244: bug only against unstable ?

Hi! You said, you are experiencing these OOPs in all 2.6.* kernels you tried. Can you tell us please, if the bug is also in 2.6.8 from testing? Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug #310328,Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 310328 normal Bug#310328: Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#310328: Bug #310328,Upgrading gnupg with open enigmail causes serious problem

severity 310328 normal thanks Hi, Unless someone can a) reproduce this and b) provide (the non-secret parts of) the .gnupg directory and/or diagnose the actual problem, there's nothing I can do about this and no reason for it to remain grave. -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Processed: Re: /usr/share/aclocal/lib-link.m4: Use of AC_PREREQ(2.50) breaks existing sources

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 310170 openduke FTBFS, requires autoconf 2.50 Bug#310170: /usr/share/aclocal/lib-link.m4: Use of AC_PREREQ(2.50) breaks existing sources Changed Bug title. > severity 310170 serious Bug#310170: openduke FTBFS, requires autoconf 2.50 Severity s

Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation.

also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.22.2152 +0200]: > I processed it with db2pdf, which worked, but it got the ISO-8859-2 > encoding screwed up (processed as Latin-1, even though it specified > the encoding. *sigh*). It should really be UTF-8 encoded [but db2pdf > can't cope with

Bug#310198: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0

Hi All, Unfortunately, the R developers haven't (yet) made the API for interfacing with R fully public, so it is necessary to use 'internal' header files. Since these header files are (fortunately) constant for a given release of R, and most people don't have a full source installation of R availa

Processed: Re: [pkg-mad-maintainers] Bug#310311: lost versioned shlibs in new version

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310311 + pending Bug#310311: lost versioned shlibs in new version Tags were: sid Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#310311: [pkg-mad-maintainers] Bug#310311: lost versioned shlibs in new version

tags 310311 + pending thanks On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 02:16:04AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Package: libmad > Severity: serious > Tags: sid > > Since version 0.15.1b-2, libmad0 has an unversioned shlibs. I guess > this is an unintentional change during the conversion to cdbs? Fixed in CVS.

Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation.

martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.22.2152 +0200]: >> I processed it with db2pdf, which worked, but it got the ISO-8859-2 >> encoding screwed up (processed as Latin-1, even though it specified >> the encoding. *sigh*). It should real

Bug#310412: More info on md problem

Steve, Martin, Thanks for writing. I'm going to answer your requests, and please keep those questions coming. Steve asks: Are you running udev on /dev? No, I haven't made the transition yet. I'm still running devfs. What was the last version of mdadm you had installed that worked? That

Bug#309677: crash on alpha

On Mon, 23 May 2005 18:07:25 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: >Do you have any clue what could cause this crash on alpha architecture? Sorry, I don't know what's going wrong. But to be honest, I would have been surprised if ASC did run on Alpha out of the box... I don't expect the changes

Bug#310412: More info on md problem

also sprach Moshe Yudkowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1956 +0200]: > >Are you running udev on /dev? > > No, I haven't made the transition yet. I'm still running devfs. Oh dear. > >What was the last version of mdadm you had installed that worked? > > That'd be whatever the previous release

Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation.

Aargh, wrong patch! diff -ur adduser-ng-0.1.2/scripts/generate_docs.sh adduser-ng-pdw/scripts/generate_docs.sh --- adduser-ng-0.1.2/scripts/generate_docs.sh 2004-04-22 03:02:24.0 +0200 +++ adduser-ng-pdw/scripts/generate_docs.sh 2005-05-23 19:40:03.0 +0200 @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: Beware of some regressions introduced by your patch. For example: -Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: libstdc++-dev, glutg3-dev, debhelper (>= 4), g++ (>= 2:3.2) +Standards-Version: 3.5.6 +Build-Depends: libstdc++-dev, glutg3-dev, debhelper (>= 3) I have

Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation.

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:36:55PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > Why PDF? Can't you just make HTML documentation from the XML and be > done with it? This patch disables generation of the PDF documentation, leaving plain text and HTML. This is a stopgap fix, but three different formats is rather

Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation.

also sprach Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.2005 +0200]: > This patch disables generation of the PDF documentation, leaving plain > text and HTML. This is a stopgap fix, but three different formats is > rather superfluous anyway. Perfect, I will try this out and upload without fur

Processed: tagging 310246

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 310246 + patch Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please conta

Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation.

Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:36:55PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: >> Why PDF? Can't you just make HTML documentation from the XML and be >> done with it? > > This patch disables generation of the PDF documentation, leaving plain > text and HTML. This i

Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation.

also sprach Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.2006 +0200]: > - generate_pdf $2 > + #generate_pdf $2 Committed and uploaded. Bug closed. adduser-ng can stay. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, a

Bug#308783: RdFToI.c

Thomas - I just read your patch to RdFToI.c titled October 2004, source code review by Thomas Biege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> where you replaced calls to popen with the new routine xpmPipeThrough(). That is a big improvement, and debian needs to incorporate that improvement in the upcoming sarge release

Processed: Fix pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310246 + confirmed pending Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation. Tags were: patch Tags added: confirmed, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#308783: RdFToI.c

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:20:52AM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote: > [chop] > I noticed you changed the semantics of compressed file detection. Sorry for the brainless chatter. I jumped to conclusions after reading the patch, not looking at or testing the final code. Both versions of the code (bef

Bug#310412: More info on md problem

also sprach Moshe Yudkowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1956 +0200]: > The reason I suspected it is because if mdadm.conf has /dev/md3 as the > device in its ARRAY statement, and I use the notation "mdadm --assemble > /dev/md/3", then mdadm wouldn't start. It couldn't translate between the >

Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation.

also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.2027 +0200]: > This fixes up debian/rules without touching the upstream stuff: And it's broken dpkg-source: building adduser-ng in adduser-ng_0.1.2-1.1.tar.gz dpkg-source: building adduser-ng in adduser-ng_0.1.2-1.1.dsc debian/rules bu

Processed: tagging 301316, tagging 310127

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 301316 + fixed Bug#301316: conflict with icu28's icu-doc Tags were: sarge patch Bug#310127: icu-doc is built by the icu and the icu28 source package Tags added: fixed > tags 310

Processed: Not yet fixed in sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310073 + sarge Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch. Tags were: fixed confirmed patch Tags added: sarge > tags 310073 - fixed Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch. Tags were: sarge fixed confirmed patch Tags removed

Bug#310412: More info on md problem

At 13:08 2005-05-23, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Moshe Yudkowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1956 +0200]: > >Are you running udev on /dev? > > No, I haven't made the transition yet. I'm still running devfs. Oh dear. Yes, well, I can't find a coherent explanation of how to make the t

Bug#310468: lbreakout2: Multiple security problems in lbreakout

Package: lbreakout2 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole [ Details are sparse about this one, if you come to the conclusion that this is not RC, then please lower severity, but I assume it is. ] [ Woody might be affected as well, I haven't checked that yet ] >F

Bug#310412: More info on md problem

also sprach Moshe Yudkowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.2136 +0200]: > ii initrd-tools 0.1.79 tools to create initrd image for > prepackaged > ii mdadm 1.9.0-2.1 Manage MD devices aka Linux Software Raid > > The new packages are: > > ii initrd-tools 0.1.80

Processed: Fixed in NMU of adduser-ng 0.1.2-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 310246 + fixed Bug#310246: adduser-ng: FTBFS: Fails making the documentation. Tags were: pending confirmed patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#308783: patch

See attached. In case of too many mail/BTS/web gateways, I posted a backup copy at http://recycle.lbl.gov/~ldoolitt/087a_SECURITY_libXpm_vulnerabilities.diff When I say "tested" I mean tested in isolation. My attempts to fully test the debian build process have so far failed, for (I think) unrelat

Bug#310412: More info on md problem

At 13:37 2005-05-23, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Moshe Yudkowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.1956 +0200]: > The reason I suspected it is because if mdadm.conf has /dev/md3 as the > device in its ARRAY statement, and I use the notation "mdadm --assemble > /dev/md/3", then mdadm wouldn't

Processed: Upload pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310077 + pending Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file. Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

  1   2   >