Bug#309201: osgcal: attached patch might be useful

Rudy Godoy writes: > Package: osgcal > Followup-For: Bug #309201 > > I've added a clean command on clean target, also added the proper entry on > changelog. I'm not sure if this is the right-thing since I'm not that > familiar > with the library, but it seems to work/build both on my sid s

Bug#308421: Ten-song submissions limit loses data

hi Anthony, On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:49:47AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > However, as it stands now: After the recent audioscrobbler downtime, I > had hundreds of tracks in the scrobblerqueue file. Then, xmms-scrobbler > managed to reconnect to audioscrobler (when it finally came back) and

Bug#310035: Elinks contains nonfree code

Package: elinks Severity: serious The elinks package contains nonfree code in the file src/protocol/ftp/ftpparse.c . The license for the file requires that commercial use be reported to the author. This is the same issue that affects the now removed prozilla download accelerator. I am contacting t

Bug#310005: no aptitude on mips/mipsel on Woody, upgrade kernels needed.

Hi Martin, There's really no need to cc: all these lists; dropped. On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 04:31:03AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Package: upgrade-reports > Severity: serious > - Did any packages fail to upgrade? > yes, libc6. needs newer kernel. It is my understanding, based on earlier

Bug#309844: marked as done (libocamlgsl-ocaml-dev: package should depend on libgsl0-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309844: fixed in ocamlgsl 0.3.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#310040: FTBFS - missing dependency

rted at 20050521-0913 ** [...] make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/netperf-2.4.0' touch debian/stamp-makefile-build cd doc && make netperf.{pdf,ps} make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/netperf-2.4

Bug#309708: marked as done (scite built with packages from experimental)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 09:29:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed with new upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Processed: severity of 309798 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > #This bug may really be considered as grave > severity 309798 grave Bug#309798: smbclient eats all memory and cpu with a simple ls Bug#309689: Infite loop while reading directory lis

Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file

[Bas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 21:18PM Friday May 20]: > Package: fluxbox > Severity: serious > > blackbox and fluxbox both contain /usr/share/man/man1/bsetroot.1.gz, but > the packages do not conflict: > > Unpacking fluxbox (from .../fluxbox_0.9.12-1_i386.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cach

Bug#309746: Recipe for reproduction

Hi! I tried to reproduce this bug, I used the sk_SK, C, de_DE, and de_DE.UTF-8 locales to generate the wordlists and change the passwords, but I have not been able to get the segfault. Can the people who are able to reproduce this please give a detailled recipe how to get the crash? I'm not reall

Processed: [solved] what to do about fluxbox?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308052 = sid confirmed Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot Tags were: sarge confirmed Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file Tags set to: sid, confirmed > tags 309958 = sid confirmed Bug#309958: fluxbox and b

Processed: Re: what to do about fluxbox?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308052 sid Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot Tags were: confirmed sid Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Bug#309591: marked as done (pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync))

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 02:32:45 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#308052: what to do about fluxbox?

tags 308052 sid thanks On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:17:38PM +1000, matt hope wrote: > [martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 22:07PM Friday May 20]: > > Fluxbox just got an RC bug which caused me to elevate the > > severity of another to merge the two: #308052, #309958 > Sorry guys to cause this c

Bug#304735: How stable is BDB?

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 04:58:13PM +1200, Martin Langhoff (CatalystIT) wrote: > As recently as November 2004, I was seeing serious lockups and dataloss > with BDB backends, due to upstream bugs in the BDB integration, and all > our LDAP setups ended up using LDBM due to reliability concerns. Und

Bug#309798: More information needed

Christian Perrier wrote: > Ludovic, > > What is the target system ? The bug you report slightly sounds like > #302771, especially if the target is an XP system. It's a Win 2000. And the bug is different from #302771 since I cannot list a single entry in the directory. Cheers, -- Ludovic Drol

Bug#309958: [solved] what to do about fluxbox?

tags 308052 = sid confirmed tags 309958 = sid confirmed thanks The fluxbox problem resolved itself, and it turns out that I was overcomplicating stuff and getting confused. I apologise for the noise and making my confusion be other people's problems. It turns out that the two RC bugs #308052 and

Processed: This bug seems to be only in sid

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308052 -sarge Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot Tags were: sid confirmed Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file Tags removed: sarge > tags 308052 +sid Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide b

Bug#308052: This bug seems to be only in sid

tags 308052 -sarge tags 308052 +sid thanks Hi Martin, in my testing, it seems the bug is only present in sid but not in sarge. How exactly did you manage to reproduce this bug inside sarge? TIA Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkne

Bug#310050: leaves stray diversions around

Package: fluxbox Version: 0.9.11-1 Severity: critical Fluxbox 0.9.11-1 does provide bsetbg and does not register diversions for bsetbg anymore (#263512), but it also does not delete existing diversions from previous versions. This will cause problems with any other package that provides /usr/bin/b

Processed: tagging 241497

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > # this is almost ready for upload > tags 241497 pending Bug#241497: need upgrade directories for hppa64, sparc sun4m and 80386 Tags were: sarge sid Tags added: pending > End of mess

Bug#310035: Elinks contains nonfree code

Hi Peter, Timo Lindfors has pointed out to me on IRC that this is a duplicate of bug #300889, which was fixed upstream in 0.10.4. That version hasn't reached testing yet, though, because there have been 6 new uploads since the middle of last month. Is 0.10.4-6 suitable for release in your opinio

Bug#310040: bug against unstable not tagged sid - intentional ?

This bug is against 2.4.0-1, so it's only against sid. As this was reported by Andreas Barth: Was this intentional? Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up

Package: gcompris Version: 6.5.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello Yann, when running gcompris on sarge, gcompris just crash: % gcompris ** Message: gcompris_set_locale '' ** (gcompris:3098): WARNING **: Requested locale '' got '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' open /dev/sequence

Processed: tagging 310035

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 310035 sarge Bug#310035: Elinks contains nonfree code There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Processed: tagging 309201

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309201 + patch Bug#309201: osgcal - uses ccache but does not clean up the cache There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#310050: leaves stray diversions around

[martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 11:48AM Saturday May 21]: > Fluxbox 0.9.11-1 does provide bsetbg and does not register Typo: fluxbox 0.9.11-1 does -not- provide bsetbg, or register diversions for bsetbg. > diversions for bsetbg anymore (#263512), but it also does not delete > existing div

Bug#310050: typo

fluxbox does *not* provide bsetbg. Sorry. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! o

Processed: Re: bug against unstable not tagged sid - intentional ?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 310040 + sid Bug#310040: FTBFS - missing dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#310040: bug against unstable not tagged sid - intentional ?

tag 310040 + sid thanks * Willi Mann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050521 12:30]: > This bug is against 2.4.0-1, so it's only against sid. > As this was reported by Andreas Barth: Was this intentional? No, just sillyness on my side. Thanks for pointing it out. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/an

Bug#304735: How stable is BDB?

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 04:58:13PM +1200, Martin Langhoff (CatalystIT) wrote: > As recently as November 2004, I was seeing serious lockups and dataloss > with BDB backends, due to upstream bugs in the BDB integration, and all > our LDAP setups ended up using LDBM due to reliability concerns. > T

Processed: Re: [zobel@ftbfs.de: Bug#310005: no aptitude on mips/mipsel on Woody, upgrade kernels needed.]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 310005 Better documentation needed for mips/mipsel upgrades Bug#310005: no aptitude on mips/mipsel on Woody, upgrade kernels needed. Changed Bug title. > severity 310005 important Bug#310005: Better documentation needed for mips/mipsel upgrades

Bug#310005: [zobel@ftbfs.de: Bug#310005: no aptitude on mips/mipsel on Woody, upgrade kernels needed.]

retitle 310005 Better documentation needed for mips/mipsel upgrades severity 310005 important thanks > - Forwarded message from Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - [snip] > Archive date: Thu May 19 19:00:01 UTC 2005 > Upgrade date: Sat May 21 04:17:36 CEST 2005 > uname -a: Linux sign

Processed: Adding the tags

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 303300 = security, woody Bug#303300: file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953) Tags were: sarge patch security Tags set to: security, woody > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#310050: leaves stray diversions around

[martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 11:48AM Saturday May 21]: > Package: fluxbox > Version: 0.9.11-1 > Severity: critical > Fluxbox 0.9.11-1 does not provide bsetbg and does not register > diversions for bsetbg anymore (#263512), but it also does not delete > existing diversions from previous

Bug#310035: Elinks contains nonfree code

Hello Steve, On Sat, 21 May 2005 03:10:19 -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Timo Lindfors has pointed out to me on IRC that this is a duplicate of bug > #300889, which was fixed upstream in 0.10.4. That version hasn't reached > testing yet, though, because there have been 6 new u

Bug#305216: this is serious

Hi, I just checked with upstream about this bug: 14:09 < Bertl> aba: no util-vserver script/package should ever do chmod 000 since 0.30 or so ;) 14:10 < Bertl> aba: instead use setattr --barrier (which will know what to do regardless of the kernel) 14:11 < Bertl> btw, that's the way it is done

Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop

Hi, I'm trying to reproduce bug you reported, but I couldn't succeed (xlock dies) it. Could you show us your fvwm configuration? Because I couldn't understand what's mean "I have set up my FVWM so windows related to Gaim always are put on the same virtual desktop.". This looks be very rare case

Bug#309871: desktop-profiles: Messes with conffiles of other packages

On Friday 20 May 2005 12:28, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 20-05-2005 10:46, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > > On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > was planning on contacting the gconf2 maintainer already (I'll probably > > get around to that this weekend), I don't expect tha

Processed: tagging 309760

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309760 + moreinfo Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop Tags were: security Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:07:48AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:09:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Sjoerd, > > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:20:13AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > Just uploaded hal 0.4.7-3sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates. This removes > > > t

Bug#309969: synaptic: segmentation fault

Hi, First, "Failed to exec method /usr/lib/apt/methods/ftp" is very strange situation. You did check by apt-get upgrade/dist-upgrade, but it doesn't help investigation. ftp method will be called when update or install really something. I believe you will meet some errors when you do "apt-get updat

Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

Package: clearsilver Version: 0.9.13-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to buld with the following error: make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/clearsilver-0.9.13' patches: debian/patches/document.py.diff Trying patch debian/patches/document.py.diff at level 0...1...2...failure. make:

Processed: Re: synaptic: segmentation fault

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309969 important Bug#309969: debian.org> synaptic: segmentation fault Severity set to `important'. > tags 309969 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#309969: debian.org> synaptic: segmentation fault There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible,

Processed: Patch attached

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 305216 +patch Bug#305216: util-vserver: Error upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Bug#305216: Patch attached

tags 305216 +patch thanks This will probably occur on everything newer than 2.4.28, I have this on 2.4.30 and 2.6.10. I've created a patch to do this the Correct Way(tm), according to Bertl @ #vserver on OFTC. Maybe the checking of the attributes isn't perfect yet, but it's a start ;) Tom diff

Bug#309969: synaptic: segmentation fault

severity 309969 important tags 309969 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

Package: glui Version: 2.2-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your debian/control file lists those packages: Package: libglui-dev Architecture: any Depends: libglui2 (= ${Source-Version}), libstdc++-dev, glutg3-dev Package: libglui2 Architecture: any Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} However, the .dsc says: Sour

Bug#309093: Just to be sure: will this upload be harmful?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I took a look at the patch you posted to -release. I found a problem with it. You need to use the -l and -L option to dh_shlibdeps to make it use the shlibs files generated by dh_makeshlibs. For example - -l$(CURDIR)debian/libsomaplayer0/us

Processed: Replacing depreceated e-Mail address

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 265539 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#265539: Possible license conflict. GPL but links against OpenSSL. Changed Bug submitter from Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 232543 Andrea

Bug#301560: a possible fix/workaround

also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1612 +0200]: > Patch attached. There must be a cure for this crap. Now they are attached. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have

Bug#308421: Ten-song submissions limit loses data

Michael Ablassmeier wrote: indeed, i can reproduce this. From about 100 Submissions only ~10 found its way into the audioscrobbler database. Yes, this one is simple enough the patch out (it's a one-line change, I'll send you the patch if you want). However, upstream put it in to try and work

Bug#305216: more infos

just another bit of information I was asking myself about the patch: 16:19 < aba> why the "*/.." in "setattr --barrier /var/lib/vservers/*/.. || true"? And why || true - don't we want to fail if it's not possible? 16:20 < Bertl> aba: probably opens a can of worms ... 16:20 < Bertl> aba: i.e. what i

Bug#294404: a possible fix/workaround

Thanks to Marco d'Itri's followup to #294404, I have implemented a fix to the problem that mdadm and udev don't like each other. It is a slighly modified version from Marco's suggestion. Patch attached. The idea is that mdadm checks whether /dev/md0 or /dev/md/0 is present and if not, that it crea

Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

Package: docbook-xsl Version: 1.68.1-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Although the issue in itself is probably not extremely important, I stll think it is RC because it is an regression for which other packages (probably xsltproc) need to be fixed, for which there is no

Bug#309367: marked as done (Syntax error in Build-Depends)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 11:17:20 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309367: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: Re: a possible fix/workaround

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 273182 critical Bug#273182: udev doesn't create /dev/md* in time for mdadm-raid to start them. All sw-raid filesys fail to mount. Severity set to `critical'. > merge 273182 294404 Bug#273182: udev doesn't create /dev/md* in time for mdadm-rai

Processed: reassign 273182 to mdadm, severity of 273182 is critical, merging 273182 294404

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 273182 mdadm Bug#273182: udev doesn't create /dev/md* in time for mdadm-raid to start them. All sw-raid filesys fail to mount. Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6

Bug#294404: a possible fix/workaround

severity 273182 critical merge 273182 294404 tags 294404 = patch confirmed pending tags 301560 = patch confirmed pending thanks Okay, Steve's config.c patch in addition to Marco's suggestion appear to solve this bug. Attached is the final patch for an NMU. I have tested this only on VMware (but w

Bug#308624: Patch for security bug in gdb

Hi, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:48:12AM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Attached to this mail a patch which fixes a security problem in gdb. >> >>I tested the patch and it works. Patch comes from the current snapshot >>of gdb, I backported it. >> >>Bug #3086

Processed: Re: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308848 important Bug#308848: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler. Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Processed: tagging 301560

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 301560 = fixed patch Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?) Tags were: pending confirmed patch Tags set to: fixed, patch > End of messag

Bug#310050: leaves stray diversions around

This does not work as the previous fluxbox's files are still installed when the diversion is being removed, causing dpkg-divert to fail when overwriting /usr/bin/bsetbg (belonging to fluxbox) with the diverted /usr/bin/bsetbg.blackbox (belonging to blackbox). You should remove the diversions for b

Processed: Re: Bug#308848: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308848 serious Bug#308848: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler. Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Processed: Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 309257 wontfix Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Bug#308848: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler.

severity 308848 serious thanks On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:53:04PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Is this really a serious bug? The package built just fine for me, but > I already had a java compiler installed. I had a look in the debian > policy, but didn't find any requirement that a pa

Processed: Re: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310073 patch Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

hi, the build process generates 2 directories within build-tree, called "clearsilver-0.9.13 clearsilver-0.9.13" and "clearsilver-0.9.13" it seems like cdbs trys to patch within the first one (which is empty) and therefore fails to find the files. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

tags 310073 patch thanks debian/rules has a rather unwise definition of DEB_TAR_SRCDIR that means the build directory isn't determined consistently. This seems to fix it: --- debian/rules~ +++ debian/rules @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f -DEB_TAR_SRCDIR=$(shell ls clearsilver-* | sed -e 's/

Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

hi again, On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:47:19PM +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > it seems like cdbs trys to patch within the first one (which is empty) > and therefore fails to find the files. the cause for this is the following statement in debian/rules: DEB_TAR_SRCDIR=$(shell ls clearsilver-*

Processed: Re: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 310088 debian-installer-manual Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process Bug reassigned from package `docbook-xsl' to `debian-installer-manual'. > severity 310088 normal Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unaccep

Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

reassign 310088 debian-installer-manual severity 310088 normal thanks On 2005-05-21, Frans Pop wrote: > Although the issue in itself is probably not extremely important, I stll > think it is RC because it is an regression for which other packages > (probably xsltproc) need to be fixed, for which t

Processed: Re: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 310088 docbook-xsl Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-manual' to `docbook-xsl'. > severity 310088 grave Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regress

Processed: retitle 301560 to with udev, mdadm --scan uses wrong device name and fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > retitle 301560 with udev, mdadm --scan uses wrong device name and fails Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?) Changed Bug title. > End of me

Bug#301560: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:35:48PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > - echo "Starting raid devices: " > + if [ -d /dev/.udevdb -a ! -e /dev/md0 -a ! -e /dev/md/0 ]; then > +echo -n "Creating raid device nodes: " > +cd /dev && WRITE_ON_UDEV=1 ./MAKEDEV md > +echo "

Bug#294404: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1917 +0200]: > > - echo "Starting raid devices: " > > + if [ -d /dev/.udevdb -a ! -e /dev/md0 -a ! -e /dev/md/0 ]; then > > +echo -n "Creating raid device nodes: " > > +cd /dev && WRITE_ON_UDEV=1 ./MAKEDEV

Bug#310111: haskell-http_0.4.20041219-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: outdated build-deps

Package: haskell-http Version: 0.4.20041219-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of haskell-http_0.4.20041219-2 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 33 > Build started at 20050521-1830 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied b

Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

Hi Torsten, On Saturday, 21 May 2005, you wrote: > reassign 310088 debian-installer-manual > severity 310088 normal > thanks > > On 2005-05-21, Frans Pop wrote: > > Although the issue in itself is probably not extremely important, I stll > > think it is RC because it is an regression for which ot

Processed: Re: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310077 + patch Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: tagging 309737

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309737 patch Bug#309737: hotmail structure seems to have changed, gotmail doesn't work anymore There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing h

Bug#301560: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:29:55PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1917 +0200]: > > > - echo "Starting raid devices: " > > > + if [ -d /dev/.udevdb -a ! -e /dev/md0 -a ! -e /dev/md/0 ]; then > > > +echo -n "Creating

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

tags 310077 + patch thanks The attached patch should fix the problem. Regards, Torsten diff -ruN glui-2.2/debian/control glui-2.2-new/debian/control --- glui-2.2/debian/control 2005-05-21 21:43:21.388784592 +0200 +++ glui-2.2-new/debian/control 2005-05-21 21:40:36.663826592 +0200 @@ -2,14 +2,14

Bug#309737: Patch

There is a patch available in upstream's sf bts at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1205355&group_id=96810&atid=615991 I attached it for reference but I haven't reviewed it yet. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ --- gotmail-0.8.2/

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:31:05PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: glui > Version: 2.2-2 > Severity: serious > Your debian/control file lists those packages: > Package: libglui-dev > Architecture: any > Depends: libglui2 (= ${Source-Version}), libstdc++-dev, glutg3-dev > Package: libglui2 >

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:49:24PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: > tags 310077 + patch > thanks > The attached patch should fix the problem. > diff -ruN glui-2.2/debian/control glui-2.2-new/debian/control > --- glui-2.2/debian/control 2005-05-21 21:43:21.388784592 +0200 > +++ glui-2.2-new/debian

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

Steve Langasek wrote: Uh, it's clear by looking at this diff that the current version of debian/control was not autogenerated from debian/control.in, and in fact should not be as debian/control.in is variously broken. The Conflicts: libglui2, for instance, still applies for upgrades from woody.

Bug#310117: monodevelop: FTBFS in experimental with mono-mcs from unstable.

Package: monodevelop Verison: 0.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, When building the monodevelop from experimental with just the mono-jit only the required packages from experimental it's failing to build. This was using mono-mcs 1.0.5-3 from unstable. It gives the following error: Ma

Bug#294404: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

(taking unrelated bugs out of the loop.) also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1957 +0200]: > * at S40 or so, you come along, see that /dev/md0 exists, and decide > not to do MAKEDEV No, I come along at S25 and I do not give a flying food for whether /dev/md0 exists

Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bill, Yann, I tried to reproduce this on sid/powerpc, but it runs OK: $ gcompris ** Message: gcompris_set_locale '' ** (gcompris:32489): WARNING **: Requested locale '' got 'en_GB.UTF-8' open /dev/sequencer: No such file or directory Opened audi

Processed: Uploaded Security Fix to ClamSMTP

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 309648 pending patch sarge Bug#309648: Cheetah loads arbitrary code from /tmp Tags were: security Tags added: pending, patch, sarge > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#308825: ,gdm logins fail to start sessions

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:42:33AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > | On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:31:51AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote: > | > |>Steve Langasek wrote: > |>| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote: > |>| > |>|>| Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libld

Bug#309982: Multiple buffer overflows in picasm

tags 309982 + patch thanks On 2005-05-21, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > FIX INFORMATION > * > The maintainer, Timo Rossi, has fixed the picasm packages and provided > a new security release, picasm 1.12c. The fixed packages are > available from

Bug#294404: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 08:58:46PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > (taking unrelated bugs out of the loop.) > > also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1957 +0200]: > > * at S40 or so, you come along, see that /dev/md0 exists, and decide > > not to do MAKEDEV > > No, I

Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:43:43PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Bill, Yann, > > I tried to reproduce this on sid/powerpc, but it runs OK: OK, I can now confirm it only occurs if RANDR is missing in the X server. gcompris is simply not dealin

Bug#294404: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.2132 +0200]: > Quoting from the patch you mailed earlier today: > > + if [ -d /dev/.udevdb -a ! -e /dev/md0 -a ! -e /dev/md/0 ]; then > +echo -n "Creating raid device nodes: " > +cd /dev && WRITE_ON_UDEV=1 ./MAK

Bug#309648: marked as done (Cheetah loads arbitrary code from /tmp)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 15:47:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309648: fixed in cheetah 0.9.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: closing 308762, tagging 308762

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > close 308762 Bug#308762: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanati

Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop

Well, I can reproduce a bug and made a fix for it. 1. How to reproduce: config: --- # Taken from .fvwm2rc # Setup more than 3x3 virtual pages DesktopSize 3x3 # Make emacs start on different page Style Emacs StartsOnPage 0 1 --- Now I start emacs. It is started on page 0,1. Then I switch to any

Processed: Re: Bug#309093: somaplayer: Just to be sure: will this upload be harmful?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 309093 + patch Bug#309093: depend on libsomaplayer There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databa

Bug#309093: somaplayer: Just to be sure: will this upload be harmful?

tags 309093 + patch thanks On 2005-05-21, Roger Leigh wrote: > I took a look at the patch you posted to -release. I found a problem > with it. You need to use the -l and -L option to dh_shlibdeps to make > it use the shlibs files generated by dh_makeshlibs. For example > > - -l$(CURDIR)debian/

  1   2   >