Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 11:17:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309367: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2005 19:52:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 12:52:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] 
(Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DXldJ-00064o-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 12:52:10 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DXldI-0003Ji-KB
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:52:08 +0200
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:52:08 +0200
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Syntax error in Build-Depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: elinks
Version: 0.10.4-6
Severity: serious

| Build-Depends: (...) libgpmg1-dev [] (...)

It's actually also unclear what this means, because you don't know
whether this is a negative empty list, or a positive empty list. In
reality, apt for example, will completely ignore this build depends,
while sbuild (what the buildd's use) iirc will assume it needs to be
installed.

I'm guessing you use some tool to autogenerate build-depends, please
don't do that. Build-depends must remain constant over rebuilds of your
package, you can use some tool/table to generate them, but you *need* to
check the changes before uploading.

--Jeroen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages elinks depends on:
ii  debconf                     1.4.30.13    Debian configuration management sy
ii  libbz2-1.0                  1.0.2-6      high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libexpat1                   1.95.8-3     XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libgnutls10                 1.0.4-8      GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libgpmg1                    1.19.6-19    General Purpose Mouse - shared lib
ii  liblua50                    5.0.2-5      Main interpreter library for the L
ii  liblualib50                 5.0.2-5      Extension library for the Lua 5.0 
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.2-4    compression library - runtime

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309367-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 15:21:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 08:21:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DZVmu-0002ph-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 08:21:17 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DZVj6-0005MX-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 11:17:20 -0400
From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#309367: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:17:20 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: elinks
Source-Version: 0.10.4-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elinks, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elinks-lite_0.10.4-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks-lite_0.10.4-7_i386.deb
elinks_0.10.4-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks_0.10.4-7.diff.gz
elinks_0.10.4-7.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks_0.10.4-7.dsc
elinks_0.10.4-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elinks/elinks_0.10.4-7_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated elinks package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 13:51:23 +0200
Source: elinks
Binary: elinks-lite elinks
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.4-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 elinks     - advanced text-mode WWW browser
 elinks-lite - advanced text-mode WWW browser (lite version)
Closes: 309367
Changes: 
 elinks (0.10.4-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Reupload due to type-handling woes (closes: #309367)
Files: 
 028822ea85775d2275dbfc0c044caf1d 912 web optional elinks_0.10.4-7.dsc
 da83df81b9b984b6a8e1c722f8e63915 24706 web optional elinks_0.10.4-7.diff.gz
 05dd7640e4c49378141bb6fbc3783d07 1324868 web optional elinks_0.10.4-7_i386.deb
 4b7fb6a39a51611a6e0802340093fe55 671414 web optional 
elinks-lite_0.10.4-7_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ask a key server

iD8DBQFCj0wwpxQ7cGWSgT0RAka3AJ9XlkaBuYE0hsxg0RE8/G6QlrYCCgCgumUs
jIk3Wjw32yubzc03MSvCGx0=
=dWrm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to