On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 17:23:19 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Oh, and forgot to mention, this issue has been known for over 8
> > months, and now there's this need to be pushy and rush things, etc.
> > I certainly do not appreciate that.
> No, not really: it was
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Oh, and forgot to mention, this issue has been known for over 8
> months, and now there's this need to be pushy and rush things, etc.
> I certainly do not appreciate that.
I have not been involved in this project so I don't know its history
but #843073 i
On Nov 21, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Oh, and forgot to mention, this issue has been known for over 8
> months, and now there's this need to be pushy and rush things, etc.
> I certainly do not appreciate that.
No, not really: it was not clear (e.g. I could never reproduce it) until
very recently.
-
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 17:09:50 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 16:38:07 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I can offer to upload dpkg 1.18.15.1 to sid with just those patches if
> > it relieves you from handling an intermediary upload until you
> > release 1.18.16 on your usual s
Just a brief reply.
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 16:38:07 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Just for the record: I can confirm it fixes the problem in dpkg-shlibdeps.
> [...]
> > Guillem, it would be great if you can upload a fixed dpkg soon.
>
> A full week w
Hello Guillem,
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Just for the record: I can confirm it fixes the problem in dpkg-shlibdeps.
[...]
> Guillem, it would be great if you can upload a fixed dpkg soon.
A full week went by already. What's your plan?
I can offer to upload dpkg 1.18.15.1 to sid
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Please find two patches attached.
Given Felipe's comment about not breaking API for find_library()
I opted to create a new function, but a quick codesearch seems
to indicate that no other package is relying on this function.
https://codesearch.debian.
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:22:58 +0100 Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + patch
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hi Guillem,
>
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > The /usr merge violates core assumptions in dpkg-shlibdeps. The reason
> > > that amd64 isn't broken is sheer luck.
Am 14.11.2016 um 12:22 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> Please find two patches attached.
>
> I checked that the command below was failing with the current dpkg-dev
> and it did no longer fail with the updated one.
>
> $ sbuild -d sid --add-depends=usrmerge --chroot-setup-commands="sed -i
> 's#^/usr#
Control: severity 843073 important
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 18:37:52 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 16:24:32 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Important change in this release of the installer
> > =
> >
> > * debootstrap now defau
10 matches
Mail list logo
