On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:22:50PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 tastete Mattia Rizzolo:
> >On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> >9) now that you're like this you can reinstate hardening, that you
> > removed but not replaced, so just put
> >
Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 tastete Mattia Rizzolo:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
I'm not a DD (yet), I can't do upload.
I know we have DD's on that list: could anybody finalize the changelog
in git and then upload the current git state?
I can sponsor the up
Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
Hi,
13) the -l option of dh_shlibdeps is really unneeded nowadays
dh_shlibdeps - calculate shared library dependencies
-ldirectory[:directory ...]
With recent versions of dpkg-shlibdeps, this option is generally
not needed.
Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
Hi,
11) the rules' clean target doesn't call dh_auto_clean. I think that
with it you can save a lot of manual `rm -rf` and also revert
adf6a7e88b051ed2fa7e7638d41d9105aa3c603c
Replaced clean target. That doesn't make the manual `rm -rf` s
On 27.10.16 Mattia Rizzolo (mat...@debian.org) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
> > Sorry to bother you again. The generated configure script seems to be broken
> > or incomplete:
>
> arggg :(
>
#842293, I've set you as submitter.
> IMHO, this should
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Sorry to bother you again. The generated configure script seems to be broken
> or incomplete:
arggg :(
> Should we open a new bug for all this?
IMHO yes.
>
> > I suggest you bring that upstream, not being able to run
> > auto
Am 27.10.2016 um 01:58 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
Tried to implement this according to [1]. I gave me an FTBFS (log attached).
That's configure.in being buggy. I quickly asked to a friend of mine
(jrtc27) whom speaks autotools
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I can sponsor the upload if you want, but before I'd like to see more
> > changes done, meaning:
> >
> > 6) run dh_autoreconf
> >
> Tried to implement this according to
Am 06.10.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
Hi,
I can sponsor the upload if you want, but before I'd like to see more
changes done, meaning:
6) run dh_autoreconf
Tried to implement this according to [1]. I gave me an FTBFS (log
attached). Not sure if I did the steps in wrong order, but th
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:35:42PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> > 3) configure done by dh_auto_configure
> >
> I'd simply replace
>
> ./configure $(shell dpkg-buildflags --export=configure) $(CONF_ARGS)
> --with-shared=$(DSOMODS1)$(DSOMODS2)$(DSOMODS3)$(DSOMODS4)
>
> by
>
> dh_auto_configure -
On 06.10.2016 22:20, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Hi,
> I can sponsor the upload if you want, but before I'd like to see more
> changes done, meaning:
>
>
> 3) configure done by dh_auto_configure
>
I'd simply replace
./configure $(shell dpkg-buildflags --export=configure) $(CONF_ARGS)
--with-shared
On 06.10.2016 22:20, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Hi Mattia,
> I can sponsor the upload if you want, but before I'd like to see
> more changes done, meaning:
>
Many thanks for the offer! I'm aware that the d/rules file is rather a
mess and we do a lot of work which could by upstream or dh. However I'm
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> On 01.10.2016 19:01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Can you also upload it?
> I'm not a DD (yet), I can't do upload.
>
> I know we have DD's on that list: could anybody finalize the changelog
> in git and then upload the current git state
On 01.10.2016 19:01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:44:21PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
>> On 19.09.2016 19:29, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi Mattia,
Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an replacement for
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:44:21PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> On 19.09.2016 19:29, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an replacement for
> >> hardening-check?
> >>
> > Hi Hilmar :)
> >
Hilmar Preuße:
> tags 836759 + pending
> stop
>
> On 19.09.2016 19:29, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an replacement for
>>> hardening-check?
>>>
>> Hi Hilmar :)
>>
>> I believe you ca
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 836759 + pending
Bug #836759 [proftpd-dfsg] proftpd-dfsg: please drop the build dependency on
hardening-wrapper
Added tag(s) pending.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
836759: http://bugs.debian.
tags 836759 + pending
stop
On 19.09.2016 19:29, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
>> Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an replacement for
>> hardening-check?
>>
> Hi Hilmar :)
>
> I believe you can just remove that check.
>
Done i
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:36:20 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 05.09.16 Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> > [...]
> Is it OK to simply remove that check? Is there an replacement for
> hardening-check?
>
> Thanks,
> Hilmar
>
> [1]
> https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening
On 05.09.16 Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi Matthias,
> This package builds using the hardening-includes package, which
> is now replaced by dpkg-dev's DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS settings.
>
> Please consider dropping the build dependency of hardening-includes
> and use the DEB_BUILD_MAI
20 matches
Mail list logo
