On 27.10.16 Mattia Rizzolo (mat...@debian.org) wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi, > > Sorry to bother you again. The generated configure script seems to be broken > > or incomplete: > > arggg :( > #842293, I've set you as submitter. > IMHO, this should be handled upstream. > I've now looked for the first time at the upstream git repo, and I see > the "configure" file being there: it shouldn't. All the artifacts of > autotool are not supposed to be stored within a VCS, only generated at > release time. Though that one seems to be kept up to date with > configure.in; clearly they are not doing the same with the rest of > autotools-generated artifacts. > > Considering that there are so many issues and maybe you want to upload > soon rather than later, for me feel free to skip this point about > autoreconf, but please try to get this fixed. > Yes, I'll/we'll do so. > btw, I peaked at the debian's git repository, and I saw that you used > the git:// protocol in Vcs-Git; given that it's possible please avoid > doing so, also see > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri.html > Fixed i git. Sorry for misunderstanding. Hilmar -- sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
