On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:02:51 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>> As noticed by the ci.debian.net test setup, this package
>> currently fails its test suite, making it fail to build.
>>
>>
>> https://ci.debian.net/packages/libd/libdatabase-dumptruc
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:02:51 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> As noticed by the ci.debian.net test setup, this package
> currently fails its test suite, making it fail to build.
>
>
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/libd/libdatabase-dumptruck-perl/unstable/amd64/
>
> # Failed test 'Array variable
Control: forwarded -1
http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/sqlite3-column-decltype-change-td88530.html
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:36:51AM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> I still don't know, but will post here what upstream says about th
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:36:51AM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > The root cause is that sqlite3_column_decltype() quotes its output in
> > 3.12.0, where previously it didn't.
> [...]
> > So is this an intentional change or a regressio
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> The root cause is that sqlite3_column_decltype() quotes its output in
> 3.12.0, where previously it didn't.
[...]
> So is this an intentional change or a regression?
I still don't know, but will post here what upstream says about this.
I've repor
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 12:10:31PM +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
>> Its first parameter is the function the call and the second is the
>> expected result[1]. If I use sqlite3 3.11.1, then the function returns
>> an array, but not [666]. With sq
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 12:10:31PM +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> Its first parameter is the function the call and the second is the
> expected result[1]. If I use sqlite3 3.11.1, then the function returns
> an array, but not [666]. With sqlite3 3.12.0 it returns the expected
> [666].
The roo
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:20:02AM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> I think libdatabase-dumptruck-perl upstream should be noted about this
>> issue. May check it locally, but please don't take my word on it.
>
> Thanks. I'll try to inves
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:20:02AM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Package: libdatabase-dumptruck-perl
> > Version: 1.2-2
> [...]
> > As noticed by the ci.debian.net test setup, this package
> > currently fails its test suite, making i
Hi Niko,
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: libdatabase-dumptruck-perl
> Version: 1.2-2
[...]
> As noticed by the ci.debian.net test setup, this package
> currently fails its test suite, making it fail to build.
>
>
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/libd/libdatabase-dum
Package: libdatabase-dumptruck-perl
Version: 1.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
X-Debbugs-Cc: sqli...@packages.debian.org
As noticed by the ci.debian.net test setup, this package
currently fails its test suite, making it fail to build.
https://ci.deb
11 matches
Mail list logo
