>> b) It is (more than) a courtesy for users / developers who run testing
>
>I agree with that one, but it is too late now.
>> e) Is there any problem of uploading libjpeg-progs just with the
>>appropriate breaks/relationship? I think the RMs would have no
>>problem accelerating this into
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 07:58:44AM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> I just ran into this as well.
>
> Why?
>
> a) On my machine, which run stable up to about ~1.5 month ago I never
>explicitly installed libjpeg-turbo-progs, so stable users who upgrade
>are most likly affected.
>
Hello,
I just ran into this as well.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 06:56:05PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 05:57:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > severity 766353 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 22
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 05:57:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> severity 766353 serious
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:20:41PM +0200, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
> > > Package: libjpeg-progs
> > > Version: 1:9a-2
> > > Severi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 766353 serious
Bug #766353 [libjpeg-progs] [libjpeg-progs] Conflicts with libjpeg-turbo-progs
1:1.3.1-3
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
5 matches
Mail list logo