>> b) It is (more than) a courtesy for users / developers who run testing > >I agree with that one, but it is too late now.
>> e) Is there any problem of uploading libjpeg-progs just with the >> appropriate breaks/relationship? I think the RMs would have no >> problem accelerating this into testing. > This would be pointless since the bug was in libjpeg-turbo-progs and is now > fixed and is not more reproducible when starting from wheezy or current > testing. > > The number of users still having the broken libjpeg-turbo-progs is smaller > everyday. I had to fix this manually... I would had been thankful if I never had to dig into this bug. Why is too late? add the breaks/replace... remove it in some forthcoming upload in 6 months. Me think you can even break an specific version... so you could help those people with the broken package installed and no making it break the current version that is not broken... And that upload could be used to close this RC bug that is still open for the current version and needs to be fixed before jessie Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org