> > > grappa:~# debsums --changed
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/README
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/TODO
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.Debian.gz
> > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.gz
> >
> > This one seems clearish, a previous version of libtiff-tools used to
>
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 15:05 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I'd be eager and delighted to fix this bug as a part of pushing out
> e2fsprogs 1.42.7, but I'd like to get a ruling from the release team
> that this is something they would support. Whether the justification
> is this particular symlink b
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:41:38PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ Sven, thanks for the investigation on e2fsck-static! ]
>
> Please see the bug log for further details and logs, it's a split of a
> conglomerate bug, but the gist of it (should) be quoted below.
>
> I've still set the severity to
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #698745 [dpkg] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> clone -1 -2
Bug #698745 [dpkg] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package
Bug 698745 cloned as bug 698879
> re
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -1 src:tiff
Control: retitle -1 tiff: Incorrect /usr/share/doc symlink to doc transition
Control: found -1 3.8.2-7
Control: reassign -2 src:e2fsprogs
Control: retitle -2 e2fsprogs: Unhandled /usr/share/doc symlink to doc
transitio
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 20:45:36 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-01-23 19:58 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
> >> I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other
> >> packages.
> >
> > And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, "
On 2013-01-23 19:58 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
>
>> I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other
>> packages.
>
> And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, "grave" (or any RC
> severity) is overflated.
Well, "serious" might
On 2013-01-23 12:35 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 03:40:34 +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.16.9
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> I doubt this is a problem in dpkg, otherwise this should have shown
> up early on. F
Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
> I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other
> packages.
And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, "grave" (or any RC
severity) is overflated.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 03:40:34 +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.16.9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I doubt this is a problem in dpkg, otherwise this should have shown
up early on. From the looks of it, it seems specific problems in those
pac
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.9
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
before and after the upgrade from squeeze to wheezy I checked
my system with debsums. After the upgrade I found several
modified files. I tried to fix the changed files by reinstalling
the a
11 matches
Mail list logo
