Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>There seems to be no point of jupp sharing the editorrc alternative
>>with joe, especially considering that neither program is compatible
>>with the shipped rc files of the other anymore.
>
> The problem is that joe/jupp use argv[0] + "rc" as name to look
> for, so it’s e
Piotr Engelking dixit:
>There seems to be no point of jupp sharing the editorrc alternative
>with joe, especially considering that neither program is compatible
>with the shipped rc files of the other anymore.
The problem is that joe/jupp use argv[0] + "rc" as name to look
for, so it’s editorrc f
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Do you think it would work if I just add
> /etc/jupp/editorrc@ -> ../joe/editorrc
> and then manage /etc/joe/editorrc with update-alternatives
> just like joe does?
There seems to be no point of jupp sharing the editorrc alternative
with joe, especially considerin
Piotr Engelking dixit:
>Jupp hijacks the editorrc alternative from joe, moving it from
>/etc/joe/editorrc to /etc/jupp/editorrc. This breaks joe if it is set
Do you think it would work if I just add
/etc/jupp/editorrc@ -> ../joe/editorrc
and then manage /etc/joe/editorrc with update-alter
Piotr Engelking dixit:
>Jupp hijacks the editorrc alternative from joe, moving it from
>/etc/joe/editorrc to /etc/jupp/editorrc. This breaks joe if it is set
>as the default system editor:
Oh, fun. Will have a look at it, thanks for noticing,
if you have an idea please do tell.
A quick one would
Package: jupp
Version: 3.1.17-2
Severity: serious
Justification: wheezy RC policy §3
Jupp hijacks the editorrc alternative from joe, moving it from
/etc/joe/editorrc to /etc/jupp/editorrc. This breaks joe if it is set
as the default system editor:
# dpkg-query -W joe
joe 3.7-2
# ls -F /etc/jo
6 matches
Mail list logo
