Piotr Engelking dixit: >There seems to be no point of jupp sharing the editorrc alternative >with joe, especially considering that neither program is compatible >with the shipped rc files of the other anymore.
The problem is that joe/jupp use argv[0] + "rc" as name to look for, so it’s editorrc for both of them. >Apparently, at the moment, jupp uses only one alternative for >/etc/jupp/editorrc. Do you plan to include the rc files from joe-jupp >as alternatives as well? They are already included, joe-jupp contains its own maintainer scripts enabling them. >If so, the correct fix is to use an >alternative name different from the one used by joe. But the name must still be editorrc… (which, by the way, could be a slave to editor, couldn’t it?) I think using /etc/joe/editorrc makes most sense – as editorrc is only used by editor, which can only point to one of either joe or jupp at the same time. Will try if that works. bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
