On 06.12.2010 06:58, Julien Cristau wrote:
> It's not the minimal change to fix the install failure.
I think that's open for debate. Plus, unless you upload directly to
testing you're going to get a few unrelated changes anyhow.
I held back changes I felt were more likely to introduce regression
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 06:25:40 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> On 06.12.2010 06:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > That's not appropriate during a freeze. Please get the RC bugs fixed in
> > testing, with no additional changes...
>
> Please explain what is inappropriate about that. I believe the pro
On 06.12.2010 06:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> That's not appropriate during a freeze. Please get the RC bugs fixed in
> testing, with no additional changes...
Please explain what is inappropriate about that. I believe the proposed
fix is the proper fix and not an additional change. Please elabor
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 06:01:55 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> re bug 597926; I believe the calls to MAKEDEV are obsolete.
>
> http://old.nabble.com/MAKEDEV%2C-postinst-and-udev-td28831653.html#nabble.pending28836543
>
> The next release will come without those calls. I believe that will
> addr
re bug 597926; I believe the calls to MAKEDEV are obsolete.
http://old.nabble.com/MAKEDEV%2C-postinst-and-udev-td28831653.html#nabble.pending28836543
The next release will come without those calls. I believe that will
address your concerns. Please keep your input coming, it's much
appreciated.
5 matches
Mail list logo