Hi!
* Miriam Ruiz [100805 11:50]:
> > A couple of weeks is quite a lot of time before a hopefully
> > soon freeze.
> > Would you please consider to upload to experimental soonish
> > (as
> > upstreams work permits to do so), so it can be tested, if
> > the memory
> > leak got closed?
> Yup, of c
--- El jue, 5/8/10, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl escribió:
> * Miriam Ruiz
> [100805 02:01]:
>
> > [..] As a newer version is about to be released, and
> hoping that it
> > fixes the memory leak, I'll wait a couple of weeks and
> upload it.
>
> A couple of weeks is quite a lot of time before a h
[ adding #575089, the memory leak bug, to cc ]
Hi!
* Miriam Ruiz [100805 02:01]:
> [..] As a newer version is about to be released, and hoping that it
> fixes the memory leak, I'll wait a couple of weeks and upload it.
A couple of weeks is quite a lot of time before a hopefully soon freeze.
W
--- El sáb, 17/7/10, gregor herrmann escribió:
> Some hours later the build finished, and the results look
> reasonable
> to me. I'm attaching the debdiff.
>
> Miry, just shout if you want me to upload.
Sorry for the delay, I'm seriously overloaded these days. I've uploaded a fixed
package th
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:56:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > If it helps I can upload the package I built last week, with the
> > debdiff I sent to #587967.
> I'm slightly torn, to be honest. Uploading your new package would at
> least allow us to have a package in squeeze that's buildable.
> O
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:29 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:20:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > we may end up with a choice of temporarily breaking gnash in
> > > testing or removing it if icu is otherwise ready to go and gnash isn't,
> > > or at least isn't on all arch
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:20:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I've binNMUed gnash on amd64 to check whether it will actually build by
> > virtue of the libboost-dev final fallback build-dep. Even if that
> > works,
> It didn't, as sbuild just tried to install libboost1.40-dev anyway...
That wou
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 19:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 15:05 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:37:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > > gregor, trying to build this beast right now
> >
> > Some hours later the build finished, an
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 15:05 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:37:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > Cheers,
> > gregor, trying to build this beast right now
>
> Some hours later the build finished, and the results look reasonable
> to me. I'm attaching the debdiff.
>
> M
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:37:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Cheers,
> gregor, trying to build this beast right now
Some hours later the build finished, and the results look reasonable
to me. I'm attaching the debdiff.
Miry, just shout if you want me to upload.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. ht
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:50:44 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> diff -u gnash-0.8.7/debian/control gnash-0.8.7/debian/control
> --- gnash-0.8.7/debian/control
> +++ gnash-0.8.7/debian/control
> @@ -7,12 +7,10 @@
> libltdl3-dev, libxmu-dev, dejagnu, autotools-dev,
> libjpeg-dev, libpng12-dev |
Thanks,
I'll try to solve this ASAP. I've just been extremely busy this weeks -and
still are- at work.
Greetings,
Miry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the unversioned packages all depend on the corresponding versioned package, so
it seems best to leave the versioned packages out of build-depends entirely:
diff -u gnash-0.8.7/debian/control gnash-0.8.7/debian/control
--- gnash-0.8.7/debian/control
+++ gnash-0.8.7/debian/control
@@ -7,12 +7,10 @@
* Hideki Yamane , 2010-07-04, 22:35:
+ ibboost-date-time1.42-dev | libboost-date-time1.40-dev | libboost-date-time1.39-dev |
I see a typo here.
BTW, those alternative build-dependencies are insane, we should get rid
of them, rather than add new ones.
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Descriptio
Hi,
As attached patch, it seems to be easy to fix. I can build it on
i386 pbuilder.
Please update it to solve RC bug, thanks.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
diff -u gnash-0.8.7/debian/changelog gnash-0.8.7/debian/changelog
---
Package: gnash
Version: 0.8.7-2
Severity: serious
gnash in sid and testing build-depends on boost 1.40, which has been
removed from the archive. Please update your build dependencies.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
16 matches
Mail list logo
