On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 19:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 15:05 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:37:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > > > > Cheers, > > > gregor, trying to build this beast right now > > > > Some hours later the build finished, and the results look reasonable > > to me. I'm attaching the debdiff. > > > > Miry, just shout if you want me to upload. > > It turns out that boost1.40 removal from testing is required in order to > finish the icu migration, as boost1.40 depends on libicu42 and we can't > binNMU it in unstable as it no longer exists there. > > I've binNMUed gnash on amd64 to check whether it will actually build by > virtue of the libboost-dev final fallback build-dep. Even if that > works,
It didn't, as sbuild just tried to install libboost1.40-dev anyway... > we may end up with a choice of temporarily breaking gnash in > testing or removing it if icu is otherwise ready to go and gnash isn't, > or at least isn't on all architectures. ...so we're back at needing a new upload, breaking gnash in testing or removing it. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
