Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 18:40 +0100 schrieb David Kalnischkies:
> Hi Jörgen Tegnér, Francesco Poli & Michael Prokop,
>
> First of all: Thanks for the reports!
>
> 2010/1/14 Michael Prokop :
> > * Francesco Poli [20100114 16:37]:
> > It's not just about .disabled files, it also affects any
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:06:20 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:40:00 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote:
[...]
> > and i also wonder
> > a bit if this .disabled thing is something dpkg likes...
> > (does it show old vs. new config file if the package was removed
> > and now reinstal
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:08:57 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote:
[...]
> It would be good if someone could have a look at the patch,
> especially at the manpage changes, as it is as always:
> I understand it as i know what i wrote and how it works,
> but your mileage may vary...
I took a quick look a
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:27:04 + Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:06:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > If anything goes wrong (e.g.: file /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs is moved or
> > discarded or just loses execution permissions) and the Pre-Install hook
> > begins to silentl
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:06:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > None the less, i would change apt-listbugs a bit:
> >
> > DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {"if [ -x /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs ]; then
> > /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10; else exit 0; fi";};
> >
> > As far as i know all other packa
tags 565213 + patch
thanks
Patch should include:
+ * apt-pkg/contrib/fileutl.cc:
+- Fix the newly introduced method GetListOfFilesInDir to not
+ accept every file if no extension is enforced
+ (= restore old behavior). (Closes: #565213)
+ * apt-pkg/policy.cc:
+- accept also par
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 565213 + patch
Bug #565213 [apt] apt: fails to ignore .disabled files in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/
Bug #565477 [apt] apt-listbugs: After removal, breaks apt-get.
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 565213 - apt-listchanges
Bug #565213 [apt] apt: fails to ignore .disabled files in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/
Bug #565477 [apt] apt-listbugs: After removal, breaks apt-get.
Removed indication that 565213 affects apt-listchanges
Removed indicatio
affects 565213 - apt-listchanges
thanks
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:40:53 -0800 Ryan Niebur wrote:
[...]
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:05:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > affects 565213 apt-listchanges
> > quit
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:44:02 -0800 Ryan Niebur wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu,
clone 565213 -1
reassign -1 apt-listbugs
retitle -1 apt-listbugs: fix the apt.conf.d file to work if apt-listbugs isn't
installed
owner -1 r...@debian.org
quit
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:05:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> affects 565213 apt-listchanges
> quit
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:44
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 565213 + apt-listbugs
Bug #565213 [apt] apt: fails to ignore .disabled files in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/
Bug #565477 [apt] apt-listbugs: After removal, breaks apt-get.
Added indication that 565213 affects apt-listbugs
Added indication that 565
affects 565213 apt-listchanges
quit
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:44:02 -0800 Ryan Niebur wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:40:00PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
[...]
> > i also wonder
> > a bit if this .disabled thing is something dpkg likes...
>
> looks like apt-listchanges does the .disabled
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 565213 apt-listchanges
Bug #565213 [apt] apt: fails to ignore .disabled files in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/
Bug #565477 [apt] apt-listbugs: After removal, breaks apt-get.
Removed indication that 565213 affects apt-listbugs
Added indication that
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:40:00PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
> None the less, i would change apt-listbugs a bit:
>
> DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {"if [ -x /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs ]; then
> /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10; else exit 0; fi";};
>
> As far as i know all other packages do it
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:40:00 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Hi Jörgen Tegnér, Francesco Poli & Michael Prokop,
>
> First of all: Thanks for the reports!
You're welcome.
[...]
> To cut it short, i will sit down and rewrite it a bit so it has the
> old behavior (expect that configfiles will be
Hi Jörgen Tegnér, Francesco Poli & Michael Prokop,
First of all: Thanks for the reports!
2010/1/14 Michael Prokop :
> * Francesco Poli [20100114 16:37]:
> It's not just about .disabled files, it also affects any manually
> modified configuration files (resulting in e.g. *.dpkg-dist) - files
> th
* Francesco Poli [20100114 16:37]:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:42:06 +0100 Jörgen Tegnér wrote:
[...]
> However, I've just reproduced the bug on a sid chroot:
> # aptitude install apt-listbugs
> [...]
> # aptitude remove apt-listbugs
> [...]
> # cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbugs.disabled
> /
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 565213 + confirmed
Bug #565213 [apt-listbugs] apt-listbugs: can't install because it's not
installed
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> reassign 565213 apt 0.7.25.1
Bug #565213 [apt-listbugs] apt-listbugs: can't install because it's not
installed
Bu
tags 565213 + confirmed
reassign 565213 apt 0.7.25.1
affects 565213 apt-listbugs
retitle 565213 apt: fails to ignore .disabled files in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/
thanks
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:42:06 +0100 Jörgen Tegnér wrote:
> Package: apt-listbugs
> Version: 0.1.2
> Severity: critical
> Justificatio
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
A few days ago after an dist-upgrade, apt-get stopped working.
I put critical on this as it breaks apt. Please reclassify if I misunderstood
this.
Example outputs:
apt-get install apt-listbugs
.
.
.
20 matches
Mail list logo
