Bug#561549: Accepted subunit 0.0.4-2 (source all amd64)

2009-12-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Collins (20/12/2009): > > If you: > > - start doing some QA checks before uploading your package; > > I already do such checks. I'm wondering how the obviously missing B-D went unnoticed then. I thought checking ones package builds fine in a clean chroot was supposed to be on everyone's

Bug#561549: Accepted subunit 0.0.4-2 (source all amd64)

2009-12-20 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 09:30 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Well, hopefully you will be happy to contact me with less feeling of > > desperation if a future, similar situation arises. > > If you: > - start doing some QA checks before uploading your package; I already do such checks. > - s

Bug#561549: Accepted subunit 0.0.4-2 (source all amd64)

2009-12-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Collins (20/12/2009): > > So what? Comaintainers are supposed to be subscribed to the PTS > > and receive mails related to the packages they're supposed to > > maintain. > > It would be nice if the PTS mailed me, but it doesn't, for whatever > reason. Since you're not saying whether you a

Bug#561549: Accepted subunit 0.0.4-2 (source all amd64)

2009-12-20 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 08:27 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Robert Collins (20/12/2009): > > Thank you for drawing my attention to this bug. > > You're very welcome. > > > I'm not the maintainer, and uploaders don't get copied on new bugs, > > so I wasn't aware of it. I certainly shall address t

Bug#561549: Accepted subunit 0.0.4-2 (source all amd64)

2009-12-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Collins (20/12/2009): > Thank you for drawing my attention to this bug. You're very welcome. > I'm not the maintainer, and uploaders don't get copied on new bugs, > so I wasn't aware of it. I certainly shall address this promptly. So what? Comaintainers are supposed to be subscribed to t

Bug#561549: Accepted subunit 0.0.4-2 (source all amd64)

2009-12-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 01:08 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Robert Collins (19/12/2009): > Don't you think it might have been a good time to try and fix the > *obvious* FTBFS? Thank you for drawing my attention to this bug. I'm not the maintainer, and uploaders don't get copied on new bugs, so

Bug#561549: Accepted subunit 0.0.4-2 (source all amd64)

2009-12-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Collins (19/12/2009): > Format: 1.8 > Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:30:19 +1100 > Source: subunit > Binary: subunit libsubunit-perl python-subunit libsubunit0 libsubunit-dev > libcppunit-subunit0 libcppunit-subunit-dev > Architecture: source amd64 all > Version: 0.0.4-2 > […] > Changes: > su