Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-18 Thread Andreas Klöckner
On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Cute, it looks like there is something messy with your aptitude in > combination with sudo :( > > Does it help if you change on the host in /etc/apt-dater-host.conf the > line: $DPKGTOOL="aptitude"; > to > $DPKGTOOL="apt-get"; > > ? > It takes

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-18 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Klöckner schrieb: > On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Does it work if you change following: >> >> # Defaults !lecture,tty_tickets,!fqdn >> Defaults env_reset > > No. > > Andreas > Cute, it looks like there is somethi

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-18 Thread Andreas Klöckner
On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Does it work if you change following: > > # Defaults!lecture,tty_tickets,!fqdn > Defaults env_reset No. Andreas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-18 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Klöckner schrieb: > On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Andreas Klöckner schrieb: >>> On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: How does the /etc/sudoers file look on the target host? >>> The relevant bit looks like

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-18 Thread Andreas Klöckner
On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Andreas Klöckner schrieb: > > On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >> How does the /etc/sudoers file look on the target host? > > > > The relevant bit looks like this: > > -

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-18 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Klöckner schrieb: > On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> How does the /etc/sudoers file look on the target host? > > The relevant bit looks like this: > --

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-17 Thread Andreas Klöckner
On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > How does the /etc/sudoers file look on the target host? The relevant bit looks like this: --- updater ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/apt-get, /usr/bin/aptitude --

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-17 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Klöckner schrieb: > On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> What happens if you try out this: >> >> ssh @ 'apt-dater-host status' > > The same output as above, exit status 0. > > Andreas How does the /etc/sudoers file look on th

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-17 Thread Andreas Klöckner
On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > What happens if you try out this: > > ssh @ 'apt-dater-host status' The same output as above, exit status 0. Andreas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-17 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Klöckner schrieb: > On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Sorry, here it is working well. I have installed exactly the same >> version to our productive machine, where debian 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, centos, >> redhat and some other distru

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-17 Thread Andreas Klöckner
On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Sorry, here it is working well. I have installed exactly the same > version to our productive machine, where debian 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, centos, > redhat and some other distrubtions are managed, everything is working well. > > I think there might be an

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-17 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Klöckner schrieb: > On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Andreas Klöckner schrieb: >>> On Samstag 16 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Could you give some more informations why you think it is still present? >>> Not sure

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-17 Thread Andreas Klöckner
On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Andreas Klöckner schrieb: > > On Samstag 16 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >> Could you give some more informations why you think it is still present? > > > > Not sure what I can say other than I'm using 0.8.1+svn443-1 client with > > a hos

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-17 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Klöckner schrieb: > On Samstag 16 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Could you give some more informations why you think it is still present? > > Not sure what I can say other than I'm using 0.8.1+svn443-1 client with > a host of the same

Bug#560186: Processed: Not fixed

2010-01-17 Thread Andreas Klöckner
On Samstag 16 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Could you give some more informations why you think it is still present? Not sure what I can say other than I'm using 0.8.1+svn443-1 client with a host of the same version. When I start apt-dater, is shown as "unknown". Then I choose "update", th