Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I've packaged (and am about to upload) libvorbisidec (tremor) based on
> upstream's svn revision 16259 (this covers the most recent changeset
> from http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/Tremor)
>
> However, the new package doesn't seem to resolve the FTBFS for mpd
> 15.3-1 on arm
On 09/20/2009 07:13 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> ARM hardware certianly has floating point hardware, and with EABI
> binaries can be built that use it on the otherwise softfloat system.
> But different ARM systems have different FPUs, and so it would be very
> hard to get coverage for all/most of them.
On 09/21/2009 07:13 AM, Martin Guy wrote:
> On 9/21/09, Martin Guy wrote:
>> I just tried this, and it's doing a misaligned word access:
>
> Sorry, my mistake. It's pumping misaligned half-word (16-bit)
> accesses, which again returns some form of garbage, probably either
> the correct value if i
On 9/21/09, Martin Guy wrote:
> I just tried this, and it's doing a misaligned word access:
Sorry, my mistake. It's pumping misaligned half-word (16-bit)
accesses, which again returns some form of garbage, probably either
the correct value if it's from the middle of a 4-byte word or some
combinat
On 9/21/09, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I should note that i have some concerns about tremor on armel in general
> that haven't been addressed by upstream (and i haven't been able to sort
> out):
>
> http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/tremor/2009-April/001564.html
>
> Maybe this update will co
On 09/20/2009 07:13 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> Luckily, I see in the bug report that vorbis upstream seems to have
> fixed the FTBFS.
I'm hoping to get a new version of libvorbisidec pulled from upstream's
svn r16259 packaged and uploaded in the next day or so. When i get that
sorted, i'll see if tha
Luk Claes wrote:
> Maybe it's an option to revert using libvorbisidec-dev and use
> libvorbis-dev again on armel to fix the FTBFS of mpd?
>
> debian-arm and Joey Cc-ed so they can give input as I'm unsure if
> current ARM hardware does have floating point support to make this
> reasonable.
ARM ha
On 2009/09/20 16:00, Luk Claes wrote:
> mpd fails to build on armel with the following message (more info in
> the full build log on buildd.d.o). This is currently one of the
> blockers for the faad2 transition.
This fails on older libvorbis versions. For 0.15.4, we have reverted
the patch which
On 9/20/09, Luk Claes wrote:
> Maybe it's an option to revert using libvorbisidec-dev and use
> libvorbis-dev again on armel to fix the FTBFS of mpd?
>
> debian-arm and Joey Cc-ed so they can give input as I'm unsure if
> current ARM hardware does have floating point support to make this
> re
Hi
Maybe it's an option to revert using libvorbisidec-dev and use
libvorbis-dev again on armel to fix the FTBFS of mpd?
debian-arm and Joey Cc-ed so they can give input as I'm unsure if
current ARM hardware does have floating point support to make this
reasonable.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Package: mpd
Version: 0.15.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi
mpd fails to build on armel with the following message (more info in the full
build log on buildd.d.o). This is currently one of the blockers for the faad2
transition.
cc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/build/buildd-mpd_0.15.3-1-armel-cDr5
11 matches
Mail list logo