* Alan Woodland , 2009-09-17 19:44:
1) /etc/l7-protocols would be a symlink to /usr/share/l7-protocols managed
by maintainer scripts of l7-protocols. It is not clear what to do during
removal (and before purge) - we shouldn't leave a dangling symlink in /etc.
I would avoid this one:
mkdir /etc/l
2009/9/18 Jakub Wilk :
> * Alan Woodland , 2009-09-17, 19:44:
>>>
>>> 2) Patch l7-filter-userspace to look into /usr/share/l7-protocols for
>>> protocol definitions rather than /etc/l7-protocols. Then l7-protocols
>>> could
>>> provide no /etc/l7-protocols at all.
>>
>> This might be a sensible opt
* Alan Woodland , 2009-09-17, 19:44:
2) Patch l7-filter-userspace to look into /usr/share/l7-protocols for
protocol definitions rather than /etc/l7-protocols. Then l7-protocols could
provide no /etc/l7-protocols at all.
This might be a sensible option, although it's a significant deviation
from
2009/9/17 Piotr Lewandowski :
> Hi Alan,
>
> I need your advice what to do with my first RC-bug. :)
I would normally recommend CC'ing discussions relating to how to fix
the bug to the bug report itself - someone else might read the bug and
have something relevant to offer to the discussion, or alt
Package: l7-protocols
Version: 20090528-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.8.3
l7-protocols would happily overwrite user configuration files:
# ls -l /etc/l7-protocols/extra/http-itunes.pat
-rw--- 1 root root 30 Sep 14 22:57 /etc/l7-protocols/extra/http-itunes.pat
# dpkg -i /pat
5 matches
Mail list logo
