* Alan Woodland <awoodl...@debian.org>, 2009-09-17, 19:44:
2) Patch l7-filter-userspace to look into /usr/share/l7-protocols for
protocol definitions rather than /etc/l7-protocols. Then l7-protocols could
provide no /etc/l7-protocols at all.
This might be a sensible option, although it's a significant deviation
from what upstream do. There are definitely other packages that take
this approach.
Would it be possible to make it look in both /etc/l7-protocols (which
gets installed/created empty by default) *and*
/usr/share/l7-protocols? That might make sense from a behaviour point
of view.
That would be doable but not quite trivial.
But what should be the semantics of -p option in that case? Should
/usr/share/l7-protocols be always read, or only if -p is not given?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
