Bug#533186: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-19 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Then the bug here is that these dependencies in the driver packages are > missing. So assign this bug to splix, gutenprint, hplip, and lsb (and any > other CUPS Raster driver package coming with Debian). As it transpired during the discussio

Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-18 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:11:21PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > reopen 533186 ! > severity 533186 serious > thanks > > Sorry, but cups depends on ghostscript-cups since it cannot work without > it. This is not true in all cases. You only need ghostscript-cups if printing to a non-PostScript

Bug#533186: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-18 Thread Till Kamppeter
Josselin Mouette wrote: Sure, if only the affected drivers need to depend on ghostscript-cups, it’s fine to put the dependency that way. But currently it is not here. Then the bug here is that these dependencies in the driver packages are missing. So assign this bug to splix, gutenprint, hpli

Bug#533186: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 19:50 +0200, Till Kamppeter a écrit : > > AFAIK only certain printers depend on ghostscript-cups. Till can > > correct me if I'm wrong. > > Yes, that's it. ghostscript-cups contains the pdftoraster, pstoraster, > and pstopxl filters and PPDs for the pstopxl filter. It is

Bug#533186: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:50:59PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> then we'll need to upgrade the Depends and Recommends of both >> ghostscript-cups and cups. > > The package dependencies which I have mentioned here ar

Bug#533186: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 21:01 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit : > As pointed out by Martin Pitt earlier in this bug's thread, APT and > Aptitude both pull Recommends in by default so, unless someone > explicitly disabled this feature, they will have all the dependencies > they need. No. This is

Bug#533186: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-18 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
2009/6/18 Jonas Smedegaard : > As I see it, this bug is real: It is fixed by either cups depending on > ghostscript-cups instead of recommending it (a bad idea IMO) or cups > announcing in NEWS file that it now recommends ghostscript-cups and > existing installations should strongly consider follow

Bug#533186: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:22:33PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >2009/6/18 Josselin Mouette : >> Sorry, but cups depends on ghostscript-cups since it cannot work >> without it. > >AFAIK only certain printers depend on ghostscript-cups. Till

Bug#533186: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-18 Thread Till Kamppeter
Martin-Éric Racine wrote: 2009/6/18 Josselin Mouette : Sorry, but cups depends on ghostscript-cups since it cannot work without it. AFAIK only certain printers depend on ghostscript-cups. Till can correct me if I'm wrong. Yes, that's it. ghostscript-cups contains the pdftoraster, pstoraste

Bug#533186: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#533186: Bug not fixed, sorry

2009-06-18 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
2009/6/18 Josselin Mouette : > Sorry, but cups depends on ghostscript-cups since it cannot work without > it. AFAIK only certain printers depend on ghostscript-cups. Till can correct me if I'm wrong. However, if we indeed depend upon ghostscript-cups because it was split from the main ghostscrip