-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:22:33PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >2009/6/18 Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org>: >> Sorry, but cups depends on ghostscript-cups since it cannot work >> without it. > >AFAIK only certain printers depend on ghostscript-cups. Till can >correct me if I'm wrong. > >However, if we indeed depend upon ghostscript-cups because it was >split from the main ghostscript package (a bad idea, IMHO), then we'll >need to upgrade the Depends and Recommends of both ghostscript-cups >and cups.
What do you mean? What should be changed for ghostscript?!? As I see it, this bug is real: It is fixed by either cups depending on ghostscript-cups instead of recommending it (a bad idea IMO) or cups announcing in NEWS file that it now recommends ghostscript-cups and existing installations should strongly consider following that recommendation. Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAko6fs0ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjGQACdGruP374Smx1NTVVNMlKJcEle h1YAoI1qMxhVm8J/DppjTSy3eS6x0CyP =wKeq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
