peter green wrote:
>
>> Since openjdk is now available in main, wouldn't that be the best
>> solution?
>>
> It would if it was in lenny but unfortunately openjdk was delayed hugely
> by license issues :(. Now we have a situation where afiact openjdk will
> only make it into lenny if one of the
Since openjdk is now available in main, wouldn't that be the best solution?
It would if it was in lenny but unfortunately openjdk was delayed hugely
by license issues :(. Now we have a situation where afiact openjdk will
only make it into lenny if one of the following happens.
*The "rc" b
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:04:08PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> It's only a temporary situation that Azureus does not currently work
> with a free Java VM. It very nearly works with GIJ -- and has worked
> with GIJ in the past -- and there's the possibility of running it with
> openjdk, as Peter m
It's only a temporary situation that Azureus does not currently work
with a free Java VM. It very nearly works with GIJ -- and has worked
with GIJ in the past -- and there's the possibility of running it with
openjdk, as Peter mentioned.
Cheers,
Shaun
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:18 PM, peter green <
The package seems to require Sun Java as it stated in README.txt. I gave
up with trying to run it on free VM's available in Debian etch.
It would appear that way
In addition, the azureus wrapper expects java in the path, which is
available only with Sun Java package installed.
Afaict this is no
Package: azureus
Version: 2.5.0.0+0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The package seems to require Sun Java as it stated in README.txt. I gave
up with trying to run it on free VM's available in Debian etch.
In addition, the azureus wrapper expects java in the path, which is
availa
6 matches
Mail list logo
