peter green wrote: > >> Since openjdk is now available in main, wouldn't that be the best >> solution? >> > It would if it was in lenny but unfortunately openjdk was delayed hugely > by license issues :(. Now we have a situation where afiact openjdk will > only make it into lenny if one of the following happens. > > *The "rc" bug (491362) that is open against openjdk gets downgraded (I > beleive it should be downgraded but as a non-dd I don't belive it is my > place to downgrade a bug based on an unclear bit of the rc policy) and > openjdk slots in just before the freeze (btw is there any actual date > set for that or is it just "sometime next week"
I don't see any reason we should downgrade an FTBFS bug on most architectures. > *The rc bug is fixed and the release team makes a freeze exception or an > urgent hint to get openjdk in before the freeze Fixing the bug looks indeed like the best option. > *the freeze is delayed Not an option currently... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
