>>> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL="2.6.1" /lib/ld-2.5.so /lib/libc.so.6
>>I have a LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 in /etc/profile which was put there for
>>jackd. Maybe I should get rid of that! Tried that with the upgrade and
>>actually got into a bash login from the console but kdm would not restart to
>>test it
>> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL="2.6.1" /lib/ld-2.5.so /lib/libc.so.6
>I have a LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 in /etc/profile which was put there for
>jackd. Maybe I should get rid of that! Tried that with the upgrade and
>actually got into a bash login from the console but kdm would not restart to
>test it ther
David Baron a écrit :
> On Wednesday 25 April 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> David Baron a écrit :
>>> Some more odities that may or may not be relevant:
>>>
>>> With the downgraded (allbeit dependency-problematic) to 2.3*:
>>> sh run from kpackage fails looking for an .so.# library.
>> Which one?
On Wednesday 25 April 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> David Baron a écrit :
> > Some more odities that may or may not be relevant:
> >
> > With the downgraded (allbeit dependency-problematic) to 2.3*:
> > sh run from kpackage fails looking for an .so.# library.
>
> Which one?
Can't get back there but
David Baron a écrit :
> Some more odities that may or may not be relevant:
>
> With the downgraded (allbeit dependency-problematic) to 2.3*:
> sh run from kpackage fails looking for an .so.# library.
Which one?
> sh run from anywhere else works fine
> bash (sh is simply a symlink to bash) runs f
Some more odities that may or may not be relevant:
With the downgraded (allbeit dependency-problematic) to 2.3*:
sh run from kpackage fails looking for an .so.# library.
sh run from anywhere else works fine
bash (sh is simply a symlink to bash) runs fine.
Opera run from a command line works fine.
On Wednesday 25 April 2007, you wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> > d_bron a écrit :
> >> Package: libc6
> >> Version: 2.5-4
> >> Severity: critical
> >> Justification: breaks unrelated software
> >>
> >> Once again, with feeling.
> >> 1. Attempt to fix up dependencies and upgrade using apt -4 in
On Wednesday 25 April 2007, you wrote:
> David Baron a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 25 April 2007, you wrote:
> >> Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> >>> d_bron a écrit :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.5-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> Once aga
David Baron a écrit :
> On Wednesday 25 April 2007, you wrote:
>> Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
>>> d_bron a écrit :
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Once again, with feeling.
1. Attempt to fix up dependencies an
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> d_bron a écrit :
>> Package: libc6
>> Version: 2.5-4
>> Severity: critical
>> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>>
>> Once again, with feeling.
>> 1. Attempt to fix up dependencies and upgrade using apt -4 install. As soon
>> as it attempted to actually install thi
d_bron a écrit :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.5-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> Once again, with feeling.
> 1. Attempt to fix up dependencies and upgrade using apt -4 install. As soon
> as it attempted to actually install this library, if failed with sh looki
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Once again, with feeling.
1. Attempt to fix up dependencies and upgrade using apt -4 install. As soon
as it attempted to actually install this library, if failed with sh looking
for one of those libso.# w
12 matches
Mail list logo
