On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:03:23PM +0200, Christoph Siess wrote:
> > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > tags 299207 + patch
> > > thanks
> > > Re: Matthew Palmer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Did
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:03:23PM +0200, Christoph Siess wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > tags 299207 + patch
> > thanks
> > Re: Matthew Palmer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Did you try commenting out this sanity check and seeing if ipac-ng ran
> > > cor
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> tags 299207 + patch
> thanks
>
> Re: Matthew Palmer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Did you try commenting out this sanity check and seeing if ipac-ng ran
> > correctly?
>
> Just tried it, it works. Tested on amd64 (fresh install) and i
tags 299207 + patch
thanks
Re: Matthew Palmer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Did you try commenting out this sanity check and seeing if ipac-ng ran
> correctly?
Just tried it, it works. Tested on amd64 (fresh install) and i386
(upgrade and data still alive).
diff -u ipac-ng-1.27/debian/changelog ipac-
Are you referring to this code in storage/gdbm/gdbm.c::gdbm_init():
/* check record lengths. This is the only spot where these
* values are hard-coded.
*/
if (sizeof(gdbm_timestamp) != 5
|| sizeof(gdbm_data_value_header_t) != 16
5 matches
Mail list logo