On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:03:23PM +0200, Christoph Siess wrote: > > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > tags 299207 + patch > > > thanks
> > > Re: Matthew Palmer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Did you try commenting out this sanity check and seeing if ipac-ng ran > > > > correctly? > > > Just tried it, it works. Tested on amd64 (fresh install) and i386 > > > (upgrade and data still alive). > > > diff -u ipac-ng-1.27/debian/changelog ipac-ng-1.27/debian/changelog > > > --- ipac-ng-1.27/debian/changelog > > > +++ ipac-ng-1.27/debian/changelog > > > @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ > > > +ipac-ng (1.27-5.1) unstable; urgency=low > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ Is this a good idea? Did you > > contact debian-release about the new > > package version? > No, it's not a good idea to upload this, given that 1.27-5 has already been > approved to get back into testing. ... OTOH, since this bug has been re-upgraded to RC status, it might be a good idea after all. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
