Bug#278495: libglib1.2-dev: Upgrade to sarge fails

2005-04-27 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:28:38AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > This bug has the severity "serious" which is "release critical" and no > comment since month which is definetly too long :) Nobody knows what to say to it :/ > In the bug logs I see some proposals regarding the perl dependencies

Bug#278495: libglib1.2-dev: Upgrade to sarge fails

2005-04-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:11:19AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This bug has the severity "serious" which is "release critical" and no > > comment since month which is definetly too long :) > > In the bug logs I see some proposals regarding the p

Bug#278495: libglib1.2-dev: Upgrade to sarge fails

2005-04-25 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello > > This bug has the severity "serious" which is "release critical" and no > comment since month which is definetly too long :) > > In the bug logs I see some proposals regarding the perl dependencies > and Frank's last mail which suggests that

Bug#278495: libglib1.2-dev: Upgrade to sarge fails

2005-04-24 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello This bug has the severity "serious" which is "release critical" and no comment since month which is definetly too long :) In the bug logs I see some proposals regarding the perl dependencies and Frank's last mail which suggests that the problem is probably fixed but not yet confirmed as suc