tags 348649 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I just tried it on an uptodate sid and with an uptodate pbuilder
and both built java-common without a problem.
Can you retry and if it still fails provide more information about
the system and the versions of the build-dependencies you are using
severity 351076 normal
thanks
Hi Akos,
this is not grave if it fails for one type of build file, therefore
lowered severity to normal. ant is used here in almost all the package builds
and no build failed because of the new upload.
Frohner Akos wrote:
> The example build.xml file reports the f
tags 350694 + pending
thanks
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: velocity
> Version: 1.4-3
> Severity: serious
The package is ready for upload since some time. However my
sponsor is currently quite busy. Will be resolved soon.
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Hi,
just got informed that /usr/share classpath links are prefered.
You can also use: /usr/share/kaffe-common/lib/glibj.zip
for the classpath. Sorry for inconvenience.
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libgnu-regexp-java
Version: 1.1.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
kaffe upstream changed quite a lot for the newest release. Therefore
the used classpath is no longer valid. The attached patch against
the makefile fixes the ftbfs.
Regards,
Package: tightvnc-java
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
kaffe upstream changed quite a lot for the newest release. Therefore
the used classpath is no longer valid. The attached patch against
the makefile fixes the ftbfs.
Regards,
Wolfgang
-- System
Package: vnc-java
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
kaffe upstream changed quite a lot for the newest release. Therefore
the used classpath is no longer valid. The attached patch against
the makefile fixes the ftbfs.
Regards,
Wolfgang
-- System Inform
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.41-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
trying /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java gives me:
error spawning gij
Running with strace shows that the java binary assumes an
unversioned gij binary in /usr/bin
execve("/usr/bin/gij", ["./java
Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: jmock
> Version: 1.0.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> jmock fails to build:
Needs a build-dep on ant-optional after ant reorganization.
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
libapache2-mod-jk2 will be removed from the archive as
it is abandoned upstream and superceeded by mod-jk.
mod-jk packages for apache2 are now provided by the
libapache2-mod-jk binary package on all architectures
and will show up tomorrow also in etch.
Regards,
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCR
Hi Matt, hi Trygve,
Matt Kraai wrote:
Package: commons-io
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
commons-io fails to build because it cannot create a task or type of
type junit:
internal-test:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/commons-io-1.0/target/test-reports
BUILD FAILED
/tmp/buildd/commons-
tags 330110 + pending
thanks
Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: kaffe
> Version: 2:1.1.6-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> kaffe failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> pbuilder.
This is a configure error which will be resolved in the next u
Hi Yann,
Yann Dirson wrote:
> Package: kaffe-pthreads
> Version: 2:1.1.5-cvs20050808-2
> Severity: grave
>
> In the sid chroot on escher:
>
> $ /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/bin/jar
> Internal error: caught an unexpected exception.
Is only jar failing or also the other ones in /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads
Package: postgis
Version: 1.0.0-1
Tags: patch
Hi,
attached patches for build depending on a specific build compiler which should
work on all architectures. These patches are untested as compilation is
currently broken by the other bugs. If you need any further information
or help with the java p
Steve Langasek wrote:
>>However, a new kaffe release 1.1.6 will come out and we decided to
>>wait for it. It will take maybe one week or so.
>
>
> Well, this was written on the 20th; it's now been 12 days. Is 1.1.6 out?
> When might this version find its way to the archive?
Hi Steve,
1.1.6 wil
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: gjdoc
> Version: 0.7.5-1
> Severity: serious
>
> gjdoc currently is not installable in unstable. It should definitely
> depend on the java1-runtime or java2-runtime alternative. At least
> java-gcj-compat is a working alternative.
Hi Matthias,
you are right - I a
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: kaffe
> Version: 2:1.1.5-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> Please change libgmp3 to libgmp3c2 in debian/shlibs.local. Otherwise
> kaffe binary packages will depend on libgmp3 which is no longer built
> by the gmp source package.
>
Hi Andreas,
we will wait
Josh Partlow wrote:
> Hello,
>
> These are the changes I needed to make to get the tomcat5 packages
> working:
>
[...]
> The index page now displays.
>
> I hope the above is helpful.
This is really helpful - thanks a lot.
I think you are running tomcat5 on a non-free JDK ?
Wolfgang
--
To
Hi Yven,
wonder why this package is not yet removed as you said on
October 2003.
Its also superceeded IMHO by java-package which provides a
method to install also IBM jdk/jre binary packages.
Regards,
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
tags 307211 patch
stop
Hi,
with jikes-kaffe instead of jikes-classpath this package builts
on both sarge and sid systems.
Wolfgang
--- debian/control.orig 2005-05-03 08:48:35.0 +
+++ debian/control 2005-05-03 08:49:50.0 +
@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
Section: contrib/text
Prio
severity 306639 wishlist
thanks
Set the severity to whishlist as decided by discussion
between Andreas Jochen, Arnaud Vandyck and release team.
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 07:40:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
[...]
(2) Include DOM Level 2 source classes in the debian directory
and use the trick that source takes precedence over binary classes
from the runtime during compilation.
If no one has objections or another
Roland Stigge wrote:
Package: libxerces2-java
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libxerces2-java in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
[...]
[xjavac] Found 13 semantic errors and issued 5 warnings compiling
"/tmp/buildd/libxerces2-java-2.6
This is just for the record, that we are working on a new revision.
There are interferences between the configure and ant build method
available in this package - which does no harm on my i386 system
but prevents building on powerpc by Arnaud.
We have to figure some things out and are currently bot
Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: libgnumail-java
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0-4
From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
gnumail:
[javac] Compiling 115 source files to
/tmp/buildd/libgnumail-java-1.0/classes
...
[javac] Found 1 semantic error compiling
"/tmp/buildd/libgnu
Package: mapserver
Severity: serious
Hi,
it seems the build system of the uploaded mapserver binary (i386) used
the libgcc1 from experimental.
cgi-mapserver: Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0) but 1:3.4.3-12 is to be installed
Regards,
Wolfgang
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT pre
batik 1.5.1 is scheduled for sarge tonight.
Therefore this bug should be closed now.
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Grzegorz,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
Hi,
That was an issue with setting default locales, and is already fixed
in unstable (fix will be propagated into testing soon). Please just try
to use ANT with this version and everything should be all right. Or
actually you don't need to do anything :-)
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik
librar
Hi,
I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release.
However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1
breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on
libbatik-java.
fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
A "solution" to the problem would be to u
30 matches
Mail list logo
