notfound 503337 0.7-1.2
found 503337 0.8-1
thanks
Christian Perrier schreef:
> From what I read in the bug log and what I remember from the history
> of uswsusp, this RC bug is *not* present in testing.
>
> Testing has a 0.7-1.2 version which does not have the config change
> d
Adam D. Barratt schreef:
> Tim Dijkstra wrote, 2008-10-15 12:38 +0200:
>> Bradley Smith schreef:
>>> tags 501997 +patch
>>>
>>> I've tested this and it does indeed fix the problem.
>>>
>>> I have attached a patch with the actual changes ne
Bradley Smith schreef:
> tags 501997 +patch
>
> I've tested this and it does indeed fix the problem.
>
> I have attached a patch with the actual changes needed.
>
> Let me know if you would like an NMU.
I would first want to know why we need that header. Why does it only show
up if you try to buil
Luis Mondesi schreef:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We tried to fix this in various ways from Splashy's end but we were
> not successful. It looks like uswsusp starts (dfb init) the
> framebuffer again when resuming at boot.
Luis,
Unfortunately I haven't looked at splashy (or any other FOSS project for
that matter) for a while, but I noticed this bug is RC. The bug log shows
you've been commenting on it, do you know the status?
grts Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Bastian Blank schreef:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 11:39:15PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>> Op Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:55:30 +0200
>> schreef Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>>
>> I l
Op Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:55:30 +0200
schreef Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > First of all, if you know what command-line arguments you need to
> > suspend you can use those with --force. If you use hal
severity 500794 whishlist
tags 500794 +willnotfix
thanks
First of all, if you know what command-line arguments you need to suspend
you can use those with --force. If you use hal (via gnome-power-manager)
you can create a .fdi file that will by-pass the white-list.
Bastian Blank schreef:
> On Wed,
Claudio Sacerdoti Coen schreef:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.8-1.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> The bug only affects version 0.8-1.1 and not 0.7-1.2 and it is independent
> from the kernel version. During hibe
severity 495319 important
thanks
Hi,
Somehow the problem is caused by the fact that one of the config
options changed name from 'poweroff' to 'shutdown'. If you previously
had poweroff that value was no-longer valid, somehow you not end up
with 'platform' which is the default...
To conclude, th
severity 488541 normal
tags 488541 +moreinfo,+unreproducible
thanks
Op Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:59:26 -0700
schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.7-1.2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> I instal
severity 488541 normal
tags 488541 +moreinfo,+unreproducible
thanks
Op Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:59:26 -0700
schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.7-1.2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> I instal
severity 488541 normal
tags 488541 +moreinfo,+unreproducible
thanks
Op Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:59:26 -0700
schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.7-1.2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> I instal
severity 488541 normal
tags 488541 +moreinfo,+unreproducible
thanks
Op Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:59:26 -0700
schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.7-1.2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> I instal
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
#Breaks only akward setups, is probably fixed for new installs
severity 459420 normal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:58:48 +0200
schreef Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > Could you please test with the latest version (in unstable).
>
> Not easily. Half the build-deps don't exist in stable.
I think
Op Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:26:36 +0200
schreef Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > That said, the script does some checks and such. It also has
> > support for swap files, which make it necessary to recalculate
> > th
Hi,
First of all: the uswsusp maintainer scripts go to great length to keep
all local modifications (I do NOT use debconf as a registry). It even
keeps comments in the file. I consider any changes not kept bugs.
That said, the script does some checks and such. It also has support for
swap files,
AnÃbal Monsalve Salazar schreef:
> Package: uswsusp
> Severity: serious
> Version: 0.7-1.1
> Tags: sid
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> pciutils-dev is now deprecated and uninstallable (strict
> versioned-dependency on pciutils).
>
> It was superseded by libpci-dev.
Thanks for the
Hi,
This is more a bug in splashy.h, it is solved in splashy svn by not
using the gboolean types, but proper ints.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: php5-recode
Version: 5.2.0-8+etch7
Followup-For: Bug #459020
Hi,
I'm seeing similar behaviour. I tried to apply the patch in the php
bts, but alas the debian etch version already has it. In other words
this bug is not fixed by that patch.
grts Tim
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:13:06 +0200
"Torsten Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there any plans to fix this bug?
I've tried. It is a hard bug. Debugging something in a boot process is
not funny even with qemu or so. I've come to conclude that something in the
directfb library doesn'
On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:31:49 +0200
Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the attachement you will find the patch for the NMU during the BSP.
No ACK
I have an upload pending at my sponsor.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:55:30 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The release 0.3~cvs20060928-7 works :
> I think the problem i had was due to the way i manually added
> etch-proposed-updates during the installation... leading to installing
> uswsusp twice, thus the error m
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:27:27 +0100
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Followup-For: Bug #411727
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the fix you have submitted. Laptop users (including me) will be
> happy to
> have hibernation working out of the box.
>
> However, (sorry
For reference, an updated package can be found at :
http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/uswsusp/uswsusp_0.3~cvs20060928-7_i386.changes
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:27:57 +0100
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - add a hook in the current package, in order to detect that we're in D-I,
> then use di's mapdevfs.
Unfortunately mapdevfs is available in the d-i environment. Packages
are however installed in a chroot under /target
severity 404316 important
thanks
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:33:28 +0100
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm experiencing the same problem as mentioned in this bug for a few
> weeks. Originally I thought I had a kernel problem, but I finally found
> some time to test different kernels just
Hi,
> Not sure whether this is related, but during the upgrade to splashy 0.3 the
> same error is triggered and after the upgrade /lib/splashy still contains the
> some files as mentioned in this bug report.
That directory will now be removed on removal of 0.3.0, it is done in
its prerm. Hmm, m
severiy 404344 normal
retitle 404344 Need script to invalidate suspended image during normal boot-up
thanks
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:23:23 +0100
Zoran Dzelajlija <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: uswsusp
> Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-6
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:33:58 +0100
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What worry me about the patch is the fact that create_lock() and
> > > check_dpkglock() are not performed in the same order. In particular, if
> > > create_lock() fail we exit with error 0 instead of 1 thus maybe
>
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:11:21 +0100
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:19:35PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > No, I don't remember having encountered this problem, but the information
> > provided by others looks convincing.
> >
> > I would apply the patch, c
If a rc bug hunter sees this and wants to beat my regular sponsor to
it. You can find a new package at
http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/uswsusp
TIA,
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:37:38 + (GMT)
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> The postinst that I have (0.3~cvs20060928-2) does:
>
> # If we didn't got a value, we want the hardcoded default,
> # so del
&g
tags 397214 -patch
thanks
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:16:03 + (GMT)
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For more detail, what actually happens is that the config file is
> regenerated on upgrade from the original debconf questions.
This is not true. It is regenerated from what is in the
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:46:44 +0100
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just bug-hunting. I don't know what the reason was why the device
> was unavailable, but I think there may be valid setups where this is the
> case.
I just read in another report by Vagrant that he was trying to
Hi Steve,
You wrote in the 396640 bug log:
> Indeed, libpci.a now depends on libz, but pciutils-dev doesn't have a
> dependency reflecting this -- nor, for that matter, is there any facility in
> pciutils-dev that lets consumers of this library know what other libs one
> needs to link against! S
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:42:40 +0100
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: uswsusp
> > Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 10.7.3
> >
> > i had locally modified my /etc/uswsusp.conf to use a diffe
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:34:31 +0200
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > All this unasked for. A maintainer script has no business messing
> > around with peoples data!
>
> It does not. It *adds* a
Package: geneweb
Version: 4.10-6
Severity: grave
The prerm of geneweb finds files that it thinks are geneweb databases
located everywhere on the system and starts altering them (updating,
moving, etc).
All this unasked for. A maintainer script has no business messing around
with peoples data!
I
40 matches
Mail list logo
