On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:27 AM Samuel Henrique wrote:
> I gave you permission to that repo (best I can do on my side), and I
> set an expiration date of the end of this year, until then you will
> end up in the salsa group and inherit permissions so it should be
> good.
Perfect, thanks!
> Awes
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:07 PM Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Leo, from my side you're free to push your changes whenever you want.
I will as soon as someone gives me access to the repo ;)
Just requested access to the Gnome group, but that may take a while.
> Let's try to coordinate things, feel fre
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:57:39 +0100 Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Awesome, I was trying to add the upstream and pristine-tar branches to
> the repo but it's not looking good so far.
I think I managed to convert it to a gbp project successfully. Take a look here:
https://salsa.debian.org/costela/gnome-s
issue. I'll keep looking after some long overdue sleep... ;)
Cheers
[0] https://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.36/glib-GVariant.html
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
MU changes be committed to the collab-maint repo)
Thanks again and sorry for the uselessness! :/
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
This has been fixed upstream by replacing JSON_parser.* with jsonsl. The
solution for wheezy depends on whether the release-team accepts such a
potentially disruptive change. For more info, see:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/11/msg00531.html
Cheers
--
Leo "costela&quo
g an backported
> patch instead of updating to 2.61.
Thanks for the heads-up. Working on it.
> Can you please also check, whether stable is affected?
It seems to be affected, but backporting the fix is less trivial. I may
need some help for that (especially with the testing).
Cheers
--
Le
s
is really what you wanted, just let me know and we can try to find the
problem.
Cheers
[0] http://code.google.com/p/transmission-remote-gtk/
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
n-Debian system, just to make sure there are no side-effects.
Should I forward this to the trac?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
Index: repo/qt/qtr.pro
===
--- repo.orig/qt/qtr.pro 2011-07-04 16
would keep the logical
separation between the configure and build steps.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
t is good time to upload it :)
Yup, I'm aware of that. It's been sitting in an "almost-ready" state on
my home-pc for a while. :) Just didn't get around to uploading it.
Cheers
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/638828
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort h
Package: libnatpmp1
Version: 20110808-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks other packages (see #638824)
Hi,
Making libnatpmp1 provide libnatpmp0 means packages in practice ignore
the soname bump, which is obviously wrong.
First, the package doesn't provide libnatpmp.so.0, which is the obvi
Hi,
On 10/08/11 10:54, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for camorama (versioned as 0.19-2.2). The diff
> is attached to this message.
Thanks for taking the time. This package is definitely in need of some care.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[inser
feel free to jump into the discussion!
Cheers
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631018
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ind us. I'll get right to it as soon as
possible (probably during the weekend).
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 18/05/10 18:58, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> I intend to NMU this and the debdiff is attached, are there any
> objections from your side?
>
No, quite the opposite. I'm totally swamped!
Thanks for the help! :)
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty
note, this also fixes the current binary version in unstable,
which had "symbol not found" issues probably from the lack of a BinNMU
somewhere.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
tag 569089 help
--
I'll try to take a look at this as soon as possible, but it's pretty low
on my TODO list, so if anyone else gets a chance to review the patches,
feel free to NMU.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
n.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the offending
patch with the next upload.
The proper solution will require some reworking, so it might take a
while. Better patches are of course welcome, as long as interoperability
is maintained.
Cheers and thanks for the heads-up!
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/557581
--
Leo "costela"
x27;re an ubuntu dev I
should sponsor this debian-NMU for you, right?... which actually sounds
kinda strange, since I'm uploading an NMU to my own package, but
nevermind that! :) )
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu
For the record, I'm not sure when I'll be able to take a look at this
problem (pearpc is pretty low on my priority list, hence RFA), so if
someone's reading this: feel free to NMU!
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
ackport of the entire package at
backports.org when time allows. That will probably happen once 1.73 hits
testing.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
Marcus Better wrote:
> Ah, yes! I did compile it myself. Don't know how I could forget. Very
> sorry about that!
No problem at all, thanks for the heads-up! (it's the thought that
counts :) )
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UN
oesn't have the file
libgnokii.so.4.0.0 [0], did you perhaps compile it yourself with the
newer version (0.6.27), or get it from another source?
Cheers
[0] http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libgnokii3/filelist
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
o I can close this bug for Lenny?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
>> can You please compile it as i386?
>>
>> Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Lars Eric Scheidler wrote:
> With more than 25 torrent-files transmission ends in a busy loop with
> 100% cpu usage and is unusable.
>
Can you please test some packages I prepared at[0] ?
Cheers
[0] http://stuff.costela.net/
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert
Hi,
Can you please try to replicate this bug after a dist-upgrade? I can't
reproduce it here, but I have a feeling it's related to some indirect
dependencies.
At any rate I'm uploading 1.11 now, which could also fix it.
Please let me know how it goes.
Cheers
--
Leo "cost
et around to it.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tag 453211 confirmed pending
found 453211 0.6.21-1
thanks
Unfortunately I had just uploaded a new gnokii version with new binary
packages, so its on waiting on NEW.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
around it in some other way just let
me know. I was assuming that - as you said - the install and
install-devel targets were all that needed to be called to have a
complete gnokii installation, but perhaps I missed something.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Btw, it's better to Cc the reporter if you want him to help ;) Reporters
> don't receive the mails sent to the bugs automatically.
True. Totally slipped my mind.
Thanks anyway!
Cheers
- --
Leo "costela&qu
On Ter, 2006-01-17 at 10:21 +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Sure! It's your package, it wants *your* love! :*
Ok, cool, then I'll upload it right away.
Sorry to make you guys work on it and then suddenly come around and fix
it myself! And thanks a lot for the poke anyway!
damn... I'm a slacker :-(
Cheers
Are you guys still on this?
I had some time today and I think I'll upload this with another few
bugfixes.
(with all the thanks, of course! :-) )
That ok?
Cheers
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 17:29 +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This is not an appropriate changelog entry, in an NMU or ot
I welcome your NMU! :-)
I've been backlogged and couldn't deal with this in a timely fashion.
Thank you for the help.
PS.: I think you forgot to attach the patch (not that it matters much)
On Dom, 2006-01-15 at 17:57 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> I intend to NMU camorama if you are not alread
severity 337677 important
thanks
--
Check the severities list [1], this bug is not 'grave'.
Probably upstream, will look into it.
Thanks.
Cheers
[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
On Sáb, 2005-11-05 at 19:07 +0100, Laurent CARON wrote:
Package: knockd
Version: 0.5-1
Seve
Agreed on all accounts, this package should be removed.
Should I file a bug myself for its removal?
On Dom, 2005-09-11 at 16:25 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: icukrell
> Version: 2.0.0pre0.1-2
> Severity: serious
> After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will re
OK, hadn't notivced that, I'm going to contact debian-release and see if
we can get the new version pushed into Sarge.
Thanks for the heads up
On Sáb, 2005-06-04 at 23:30 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: gaim-encryption
> Version: 2.36-3
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sarge
>
>
> This is a remin
I think it's a safe bet:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/faq.html#q3.1
No harm, no foul.
Cheers and thanks again
On Qua, 2005-03-23 at 23:05 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10237 March 1977, Leo Antunes wrote:
>
> > About this bug, where is gaim-encryption linked with OpenSSL?
This had completely slipped my mind.
Sorry for the noise, I received the bug report and forwarded it to you
without giving it the proper attention. I should have remembered this
before.
Anyway, no harm no foul.
Another very small thing that crossed my mind: when compiled with a
diferent Gaim vers
Hi,
A couple of news of interest:
Firstly, gaim-encryption has finally been uploaded to Debian's unstable
branch. It's now instalable by all Debian users, there's no more need
for my personal repository to contain Gaim-encryption's packages.
This might actually generate a lot of bug reports[1] and
Subject: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors
Package: amavis-ng
Version: 0.1.6.9-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After an upgrade, amavis started spewing a lot of emergency errors and
stoped working (bringing down all mail delivery with it).
I use the Courier m
43 matches
Mail list logo
