Hello,
this is a time-dependent test that is a bit brittle and flaky. I would
lean on disabling only this one test, and possibly a few other if they
show similar flakiness.
I'll do that with a Debian patch and then upstream too.
Free
Mathias Gibbens writes:
> Any thoughts on this? I'm leani
I'm ok disabling the tests altogether. Thanks for looking.
Mathias Gibbens writes:
> I'm seriously considering just disabling the tests for this package.
> I can't reproduce the most recently reported failure on any of my
> machines, although I don't doubt that it is reproducible for Lucas.
>
Hello Sergio,
I've been a bit surprised that this raft package was included in the
list of affected packages, and indeed the reason seems to be trivial.
This package is part of the transition because the check-armhf-time_t
tool failed to analyze its headers and put it in the list of failed
result
Thanks for diagnosing this, Mathias.
I'll take a look a this in the next few days, unless you want to tackle
it yourself.
Mathias Gibbens writes:
> Sphinx 7.0.0 dropped the `style` key
> (https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/11381). Version 7.2.6 was
> uploaded to unstable early last mon
49557f332e060faf08247687f10a26bd3e35bb46
Author: Free Ekanayaka
Date: Wed Jan 18 09:10:56 2017 +
Release 0.2.6-1
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index f7493e1..5850b2a 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+txfixtures (0.2.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
cea07f92d6c0ff1de369e6ad8e5a0f1e78160b57
Author: Free Ekanayaka
Date: Sun Jan 8 09:29:26 2017 +
Release 0.2.5-1
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index da6daf5..f7493e1 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+txfixtures (0.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
f424ec3ef0178fceb492c90a7c440bc55e39566f
Author: Free Ekanayaka
Date: Mon Dec 19 16:08:40 2016 +
New upstream release
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 38c1ea3..ec0a236 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+systemfixtures (0.6.1-1) unstable
6ef191c7bf6fd1854f7af18e57238fb5f696bf30
Author: Free Ekanayaka
Date: Sat Dec 10 08:17:08 2016 +
Update changelog for 16.6.0-2 release
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 41a7b05..8a8c1f9 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+twisted (16.6.0-2) unstable
bb151dec481c9f01aec894a2a38c348a3faca498
Author: Free Ekanayaka
Date: Wed Nov 23 05:05:13 2016 +
Update changelog for 1.14-7 release
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 9d8d846..7dc34eb 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+horgand (1.14-7) unstable; urgency=medium
224b46e0dda4addb26cfa7ced21691c871756daa
Author: Free Ekanayaka
Date: Wed Nov 23 04:44:08 2016 +
Update changelog for 0.2-2 release
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e176659..5e848c0 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+obsub (0.2-2) unstable; urgency
affects 843631 twisted
https://ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/t/twisted/20161109_095205.autopkgtest.log.gz
5e859851a5c65d25cfc09974489973a1e8103a5b
Author: Free Ekanayaka
Date: Wed Nov 2 10:32:12 2016 +
Update changelog for 16.10.1-2 release
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index cb51174..721797f 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+incremental (16.10.1-2
Hi,
|--==> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:54:01 +0100, Jan Wagner said:
JW> Hi there,
JW> On Thursday 30 July 2009, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>>you were working on smart the other day, so I wondered whether you'd
>>have time to look into (and either close or fix) #418642, a fairly old
>>RC bug th
Hi,
|--==> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:05:49 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš
said:
>>Od: Cyril Brulebois
>>
>>Sorry about the first NMU, looks like I only removed libc6-dev from
>>Build-Depends on a porter box, and checked it was OK there; and only
>>wro
|--==> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 06:19:40 +0100, Cyril Brulebois
said:
CB> Sorry about the first NMU, looks like I only removed libc6-dev from
CB> Build-Depends on a porter box, and checked it was OK there; and only
CB> wrote about it on my devel box, where the NMU was prepared. Hopefully
CB> t
Thanks.
|--==> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:02:41 +0100, Sandro Tosi said:
ST> Dear maintainer,
ST> I've prepared an NMU for python-augeas (versioned as 0.2.0-1.1) and
ST> uploaded it to DELAYED/3.
ST> Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Hi Reinhard,
thanks a lot for having taken care of this bug and of the latest
jack-audio-connection it upload. I hadn't add time for Debian
packaging last wee.
I've noticed that you committed the changes in the git repo and added
yourself as uploader, very good, seems that Debian-Multimedia/Pkg-M
Hi Luk,
|--==> On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:32:47 +0100, Luk Claes said:
LC> Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Hi Luk,
>>
>>|--==> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:09:59 +0100, Luk Claes said:
>>
LC> Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>>>Hi Asheesh,
>>&
Hi Luk,
|--==> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:09:59 +0100, Luk Claes said:
LC> Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Hi Asheesh,
>>
>>|--==> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:52:34 -0800 (PST), Asheesh Laroia
said:
>>
AL> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
>
Hi Felipe,
|--==> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:03:56 -0300, Felipe Sateler
said:
FS> package ardour
FS> found 446405 1:2.7.1-1
FS> thanks
FS> This upload doesn't actually fix this, there is a typo in debian/rules:
FS> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
FS> index c57613c..b20eafa 10
Hi,
|--==> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:13:57 -0500, The Anarcat
said:
TA> Package: ardour
TA> Followup-For: Bug #446405
TA> what's the status on the libsndfile upstream release here?
TA> it seems like sid has the latest libsndfile, is that okay now with
TA> Ardour?
Yes, I think it would
Hi Asheesh,
|--==> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:52:34 -0800 (PST), Asheesh Laroia
said:
AL> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
>>attached as debdiff.patch against -1
AL> Actually attached this time. Pardon the noise!
Thanks for all your work, I will upload the package today.
I'm als
Hi Raphael,
|--==> Raphael Geissert writes:
RG> Source: linux-patch-bootsplash
RG> Version: 2.6.21-2
RG> Severity: serious
RG> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RG> Usertags: proposed-removal
RG> Hi,
RG> While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
RG> candidate for r
Hi Nico,
thanks for having taken care of it. I'll merge the patch
in SVN, and use it as base of the next version.
Ciao,
Free
On Dec 4, 2007 7:05 PM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> attached is a patch for a 0-day NMU which fixed both bugs.
> It will be also archived on:
> http://p
Package: system-tools-backends
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: important
|--==> Sven Arvidsson writes:
SA> [ Follow up for http://bugs.debian.org/413564 ]
SA> Hi,
SA> gnome-system-tools version 2.18 is available in unstable now, it would
SA> be great if you could test this version (or when it
|--==> Sven Arvidsson writes:
SA> [ Follow up for http://bugs.debian.org/413564 ]
SA> Hi,
SA> gnome-system-tools version 2.18 is available in unstable now, it would
SA> be great if you could test this version (or when it hits testing) and
SA> see if the bug is still there.
Hi,
some da
Hi,
instead of dropping the flag completely would it make sense enabling
it only for i386 and amd64? I got reports from users for which it
really makes the difference in terms of performance, and its used is
recommended by the upstream authors whenever possible.
Maybe we could add something like
Hi Aaron,
|--==> Aaron M Ucko writes:
AMU> Package: openmovieeditor
AMU> Version: 0.0.20061221-2
AMU> Severity: grave
AMU> Justification: renders package unusable
AMU> On amd64, openmovieeditor depends on libjack0 (>= 0.102.20), which is
AMU> not in Debian (unstable *or* experimental
|--==> Steve Langasek writes:
SL> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:19:14AM +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon wrote:
>>On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:42:14PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>> which was filed against the rosegarden package.
>>I've the same problem with 1.5.0-3
SL> Yes, I see that
Hi Bastian,
|--==> Bastian Kleineidam writes:
BK> Bastian Blank schrieb:
>>So using this flag is not appropriate for debian i386 packages.
BK> Ok, I attached a patch that just removes the flag usage. Since it
BK> patches Makefile.in directly, no regeneration ist needed.
BK> --- Makefil
|--==> Jesse McKeown writes:
JM> Could not sysv-rc-bootsplash be extended to include a full rc,rcS,etc
JM> and declared Conflicts with sysv-rc / Provides -rc ?
Yes, theoretically speaking yes. But I would say it's a rather hacky
and brute force solution and I'd prefer to work out which
|--==> Steve Langasek writes:
SL> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:28:45AM +0100, Pablo Chinea wrote:
>>El Sábado, 23 de Septiembre de 2006 10:19, Steve Langasek escribió:
>>> It most certainly is a policy violation. A package is not allowed to edit
>>> a conffile, *ever*.
>>I didn't know it
They don't want to give away the
API.
JSP> I should clarify that I'm not trying to make the whole technology
JSP> available, just the necessary bits to allow my program work. This
JSP> couldn't be used to move fst to main (perhaps, it could).
JSP> Oh, that re
|--==> Bastian Blank writes:
BB> Package: fst
BB> Version: 1.8-1
BB> Severity: serious
BB> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>>Automatic build of fst_1.8-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
BB> [...]
>>** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
>>Build
|--==> Sebastian Bremicker writes:
SB> Hi!
>>As seen below, the package description refers to a userland package that
does
>>not exist, hence making this code essentially useless. The repository
>>mentioned as a workaround in previous bug reports is no longer active. This
>>package n
|--==> Junichi Uekawa writes:
JU> Hi,
JU> Anyway, we need to find some solution over how to package bootsplash
JU> package; we are in a difficult situation where there is no bootsplash
JU> package while there is kernel-patch-bootsplash in Debian.
Hi,
sorry for the long delay. I thin
|--==> Justin Pryzby writes:
JP> package vkeybd
JP> tag 346976 patch
JP> thanks
JP> I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
JP> group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
JP> produced a binary package with expected debdiff outpu
Package: lilypond-data
Version: 2.6.3-9
Severity: serious
The maintainer scripts call /usr/bin/kpsewhich which is included in
libkpathsea-perl, but libkpathsea-perl iteself is not listed in the
Depends (or better Pre-Depends).
Cheers,
Free
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Hi all,
is there any news about this bug? I'd really like to see gnopernicus
in testing..
Cheers,
Free
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|--==> Luk Claes writes:
LC> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
LC> Hash: SHA1
LC> Hi
LC> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
LC> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
LC> patch or if you think that the attached patch
40 matches
Mail list logo
