Bug#1093144: openturns: FTBFS on amd64: build hangs

2025-01-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: openturns Version: 1.24-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi, openturns has failed to build several times on amd64 (and on the arch:all buildd, which is also amd64), due to the build hanging: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=openturns&ver=1.24-3&arch=amd64 Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1093118: ruby-redis: causes autopkgtest regressions for ruby-fakeredis

2025-01-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: ruby-redis Version: 5.3.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is causing autopkgtest regressions on ruby-fakeredis [1], preventing it from migrating to testing. If the issue is in ruby-fakeredis, then feel free to add the necessary information and reassign. Cheers, Emilio [1] https://t

Bug#1092998: [Debian-pan-maintainers] Bug#1092998: pyvkfft-cuda: rebuild for python3.13 as default python version

2025-01-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 14/01/2025 13:40, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: Is it possible to make it binNMUable ? I don't think so, because it build-depends on a nvidia-cuda-toolkit, which is in non-free, so it's bd-uninstallable on the buildds as non-free is not enabled there. But you can ask in debian-wb-team@l.d

Bug#1092998: pyvkfft-cuda: rebuild for python3.13 as default python version

2025-01-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: pyvkfft-cuda Version: 2024.1.4+ds1-4 Severity: serious Hi, The ongoing python3.13 as python3 interpreter causes your package to be uninstallable, which would be solved by a rebuild. Please upload one on a clean sid environment so that the transition can proceed with your package. Cheers

Bug#1092756: uwsgi: build against openjdk-21

2025-01-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: uwsgi Version: 2.0.28-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package depends on openjdk-17, which won't be shipped for trixie. Please change the bindings so that they build against openjdk-21. Alternatively, this could be solved by uploading the new plugin in salsa (which I just realised is actuall

Bug#1092673: nvidia-cuda-toolkit-gcc: depends on g++-12

2025-01-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: nvidia-cuda-toolkit-gcc Version: 12.2.1-2 Severity: serious Hi, nvidia-cuda-toolkit-gcc depends on g++-12, which is likely not going to be a part of trixie. Please update to g++-13 or preferably g++-14. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1091032: Reassign to emscripten

2025-01-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:18:13 +0100 Yadd wrote: Control: reassign -1 emscripten Control: affects -1 node-inwasm Emscripten automatically adds "--no-growable-memory" which is incompatible with wasm-ld-18 emscripten is currently in a bad shape. Given emscripten is a a javascript transpiler,

Bug#1091452: Prevent testing migration

2025-01-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:43:09 +0100 Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Package: phoc > Version: 0.44~rc1-1 > Severity: grave > > Let's prevent testing migration until we upload the non-rc version. p-m-s migrated (althoug

Bug#1074774: Upgrading bctoolbox to 5.3.x

2025-01-03 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:51:47 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote: Version: 5.3.97-1 This introduced a SONAME bump, so will need a transition. Can you check the rdeps and then file a transition bug against the release.debian.org pseudopackage? That way we can finish the mbedtls transition. Alternativ

Bug#1085192: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#1085192: phoc: build-depends on missing: libwlroots-dev:loong64 (>= 0.17.0)

2024-12-27 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 25/10/2024 09:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Hi, On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:12:18 +0200 Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= wrote: Hi, thanks for looking into this. On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 02:50:15PM +0800, zhangdandan wrote: > 3. Solution > Please take care of the d/control file i

Bug#1091190: pocl: autopkgtest regression in rdeps since switch to llvm 18

2024-12-23 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: pocl Version: 6.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, The 6.0-3 upload is causing autopkgtest regressions in some rdeps, possibly due to the switch to llvm 18, see: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pocl This is blocking pocl's migration to testing. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1090730: slurm-wlm: not built on buildd

2024-12-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:23:20 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Source: slurm-wlm Version: 24.11.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package needs a source-only upload in order to be able to migrate to testing: ∙ ∙ Not built on buildd: arch amd64 binaries uploaded by oliva ∙ ∙ Not built on

Bug#1090900: fenics-dolfinx: autopkgtest regressions with HDF5 1.14

2024-12-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 10:42:51 +0200 Drew Parsons wrote: Source: fenics-dolfinx Followup-For: Bug #1090900 X-Debbugs-Cc: 1088...@bugs.debian.org There's something wrong here. fenics-dolfinx 1:0.9.0-5+b1 is rebuilt against the new hdf5 1.14, and passing tests in unstable. The tests in testing ar

Bug#1090791: petsc: strict dependency on the mpich version that was used to build

2024-12-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 23:34:42 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: Control: affects -1 + src:slepc src:fenics-dolfinx src:mpich On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 19:19:43 +0200 Drew Parsons wrote: > This is a delicate issue. The strict version test is in the upstream > headers. I imagine they have their reasons f

Bug#1090791: petsc: strict dependency on the mpich version that was used to build

2024-12-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: petsc Version: 3.22.1+dfsg1-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: mp...@packages.debian.org Hi, Looks like petsc has a strict dependency on the mpich version used to build it. Which means that whenever mpich is updated, then rdeps will fail to build. That kind of strict dependency should prob

Bug#1090730: slurm-wlm: not built on buildd

2024-12-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: slurm-wlm Version: 24.11.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package needs a source-only upload in order to be able to migrate to testing: ∙ ∙ Not built on buildd: arch amd64 binaries uploaded by oliva ∙ ∙ Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by oliva, a new source-only upload is

Bug#1089084: fplll: binaries not built on buildds, needs source-only upload

2024-12-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: fplll Version: 5.5.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your last upload included binaries to clear NEW, however maintainer-built binaries are not allowed into testing, and since the package includes arch:all binaries, we can't just binNMU it to be built on the buildds. So this will require a source

Bug#1088035: opm-models: Request for removal to allow migration of newer opm-(common,grid,simulators,upscaling) pkgs

2024-12-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:49:46 +0100 Markus Blatt wrote: Source: opm-models Version: 2024.04+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: To allow migration of opm-common et al. Dear Maintainer, This bug is reported to force removal of src:opm-models from testing to allow migrations of other packages.

Bug#1088866: sundials: autopkgtest failures

2024-12-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: sundials Version: 7.1.1+dfsg1-5 Severity: serious Hi, sundials autopkgtests are failing sometimes, causing the package to be blocked from testing migration, and blocking the ongoing transitions. I wonder if the change for oversubscription should also be applied to debian/tests/ ? https:

Bug#1088865: dolfin: autopkgtests fail

2024-12-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: dolfin Version: 2019.2.0~legacy20240219.1c52e83-11 Severity: serious Hi, autopkgtests for dolfin are currently failing, blocking testing migration and the openmpi transition. See: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dolfin https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openmpi Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1088837: starpu-contrib: rebuild against libopenmpi40

2024-12-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: starpu-contrib Version: 1.4.5+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Hi, Please rebuild starpu-contrib for the ongoing openmpi transition. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1074774: Upgrading bctoolbox to 5.3.x

2024-12-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Thu, 08 Aug 2024 18:27:02 +0200 Andrea Pappacoda wrote: Hi Bernhard, writing to you directly since sometimes the BTS discards emails. Could you please let me know if you have plans for upgrading bctoolbox to a new upstream version from the 5.3 branch? It's needed to continue with the mbed

Bug#1088834: gretl: FTBFS: LaTeX Error: Command \theHscript already defined

2024-12-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: gretl Version: 2024c-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild for the openmpi transition, your package failed to build. Here's the (hopefully) relevant part of the log: make -C doc make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/addons/gig/doc' This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.2

Bug#1088648: vips: update to 8.16.0 causes regression in ruby-vips autopkgtest

2024-11-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/11/2024 20:56, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Hi Emilio, On 30/11/2024 05:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 29/11/2024 20:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: reassign -1 ruby-vips Control: affects -1 vips Control: tags -1 patch (actually reassigning) On 29/11/2024 18:48, László

Bug#1088648: vips: update to 8.16.0 causes regression in ruby-vips autopkgtest

2024-11-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 29/11/2024 20:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: reassign -1 ruby-vips Control: affects -1 vips Control: tags -1 patch (actually reassigning) On 29/11/2024 18:48, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: reassign -1 ruby-vips affects -1 vips Hi Emilio, On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:51 AM

Bug#1088649: imagick autopkgtest

2024-11-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
/changelog 2024-11-30 09:12:24.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +php-imagick (3.7.0-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix test dependencies for imagemagick 7. Closes: #1088649. + + -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:12:24 +0100 + php-imagick (3.7.0-9) unstable

Bug#1088648: vips: update to 8.16.0 causes regression in ruby-vips autopkgtest

2024-11-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: reassign -1 ruby-vips Control: affects -1 vips Control: tags -1 patch (actually reassigning) On 29/11/2024 18:48, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: reassign -1 ruby-vips affects -1 vips Hi Emilio, On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:51 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Your package cannot

Bug#1086489: xsimd: autopkgtest is failing on arm64

2024-11-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:55:29 +0100 Drew Parsons wrote: Control: forwarded 1086489 https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd/issues/1066 Emilio's verbose log shows 2885s 1: /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.8mniqst8/downtmp/build.OlH/src/test/test_xsimd_api.cpp:631: ERROR: CHECK_EQ( extract(xsimd::lgamma(T(v

Bug#1088664: nwchem: autopkgtest failures

2024-11-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: nwchem Version: 7.0.2-4 Severity: serious Hi, Your package cannot get back into testing due to some autopkgtest failures: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nwchem Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1088649: php-imagick: autopkgtest failure

2024-11-28 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: php-imagick Version: 3.7.0-9 Severity: serious Hi, Your package cannot migrate to testing because its autopkgtests are failing: 125s There were 2 failures: 125s 125s 1) /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.rken35c7/downtmp/build.cd4/src/imagick-3.7.0/tests/243_Tutorial_svgExample_basic.phpt 125s Faile

Bug#1088648: vips: update to 8.16.0 causes regression in ruby-vips autopkgtest

2024-11-28 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: vips Version: 8.16.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-v...@packages.debian.org Hi, Your package cannot migrate to testing due to a regression in ruby-vips' autopkgtest: 55s Failures: 55s 55s 1) Vips::Image can add_alpha 55s Failure/Error: y = x.add_alpha 55s 55s

Bug#1088626: aevol: build-deps on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-28 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: aevol Version: 5.0+ds-3 Severity: serious Hi, aevol build-depends on libopenmpi-dev, which is no longer built on 32-bit architectures. Thus it should either stop build-depending on it (perhaps by using mpi-default-dev, which depends on mpich on those architectures) or be removed from the

Bug#1087965: tachyon: build-depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-28 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 22:42:58 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Source: tachyon Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-12 Severity: serious Hi, Your package (build-)depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures, where openmpi is no longer available. In order to solve this, your package should build

Bug#1087964: netpipe: build-depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-27 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 22:42:56 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Source: netpipe Version: 3.7.2-9 Severity: serious Hi, Your package (build-)depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures, where openmpi is no longer available. In order to solve this, your package should build-depend

Bug#1088345: fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS on mips64el: test failures

2024-11-27 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: fenics-dolfinx Version: 1:0.9.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package failed to build on mips64el, where it built before. From the build log: FAILED test/unit/fem/test_petsc_solver_wrappers.py::TestPETScSolverWrappers::test_compare_solvers[GhostMode.none] FAILED test/unit/fem/test_petsc

Bug#1086489: xsimd: autopkgtest is failing on arm64

2024-11-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/11/2024 16:51, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2024-11-22 15:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 19/11/2024 09:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Hi, Running ctest in debian/tests/xsimd-test with --verbose and/or --output-on-failure may help diagnose the issue. I have uploaded the attached

Bug#1086489: xsimd: autopkgtest is failing on arm64

2024-11-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/11/2024 16:51, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2024-11-22 15:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 19/11/2024 09:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Hi, Running ctest in debian/tests/xsimd-test with --verbose and/or --output-on-failure may help diagnose the issue. I have uploaded the attached

Bug#1086489: xsimd: autopkgtest is failing on arm64

2024-11-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 19/11/2024 09:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Hi, On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:12:31 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: severity -1 serious On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 09:49:29 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Source: xsimd > Version: 13.0.0-1 > Severity: important > >

Bug#1078743: vtk9: BD-Uninstallable on 32-bit architectures after #1068320

2024-11-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 20/11/2024 18:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: tags -1 patch On 20/11/2024 14:32, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 09:05:38 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, Thanks for the explanation. On 01-11-2024 22:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > In this particular c

Bug#1077978: package assumes that the default JVM is the server VM

2024-11-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 13:53:51 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:vtk9 Version: 9.3.0+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie The package assumes that the default JVM is the server VM. Please don't make such an assumption. Failing autopkg tests on all architectures where zero is the de

Bug#1088010: ngg: FTBFS on s390x: nng.sp.transport.socket.sockfd_test failed

2024-11-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: nng Version: 1.9.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, ngg built on s390x in version 1.9.0-1, but in a rebuild for the mbedtls transition it failed to build with a test failure. Since it has been built before, it is a regression and thus RC. Build logs at: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?

Bug#1086918: fixed in python-escript 5.6-8

2024-11-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: reopen -1 On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:54:50 + Debian FTP Masters wrote: Source: python-escript Source-Version: 5.6-8 Done: Alastair McKinstry We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-escript, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

Bug#1087997: ampliconnoise: build-deps on libopenmpi-dev, which is no longer available on 32-bit arches

2024-11-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: ampliconnoise Version: 1.29-14 Severity: serious Hi, Your package build-depends on libopenmpi-dev, which is no longer built for 32-bit architectures. You should probably switch to mpi-default-dev, which depends on openmpi for 64-bit architectures and on mpich for 32-bit ones. Cheers, Emi

Bug#1087988: hdf5: incomplete openmpi removal on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On 21/11/2024 14:52, p...@debian.org wrote: Hi Emilio, Le 2024-11-21 13:27, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : Source: hdf5 Version: 1.10.10+repack-4 Severity: serious Hi, Due to the way openmpi support was dropped, using:   Build-Depends: libopenmpi-dev | architecture-is-32-bit and

Bug#1087988: hdf5: incomplete openmpi removal on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: hdf5 Version: 1.10.10+repack-4 Severity: serious Hi, Due to the way openmpi support was dropped, using: Build-Depends: libopenmpi-dev | architecture-is-32-bit and the way build-dependencies are installed in sbuild, where only the first alternative is considered, the old libopenmpi-dev

Bug#1087987: cp2k: build-depends on libelpa-dev which is no longer available on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: cp2k Version: 2023.1-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package build-depends on libelpa-dev, but that package has been removed from armel, armhf and i386 due to the removal of OpenMPI and the lack of support for MPICH. Thus cp2k should drop elpa support on those architectures. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1087962: libstopt-dev: depends on libopenmpi-dev on architectures where it's no longer built

2024-11-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: libstopt-dev Version: 5.12+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Hi, libstopt-dev hardcodes a dependency on libopenmpi-dev, which is no longer built on 32 bit architectures. The dependency should probably be switched to mpi-default-dev, just like the build-depends. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1087963: yorick: build-depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: yorick Version: 2.2.04+dfsg1-13 Severity: serious Hi, Your package (build-)depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures, where openmpi is no longer available. In order to solve this, your package should build-depend on mpi-default-dev instead to build against the default mpi implemen

Bug#1087966: open-coarrays: build-depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: open-coarrays Version: 2.10.2+ds-2.1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package (build-)depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures, where openmpi is no longer available. In order to solve this, your package should build-depend on mpi-default-dev instead to build against the default mpi imp

Bug#1087965: tachyon: build-depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: tachyon Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-12 Severity: serious Hi, Your package (build-)depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures, where openmpi is no longer available. In order to solve this, your package should build-depend on mpi-default-dev instead to build against the default mpi implemen

Bug#1087964: netpipe: build-depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures

2024-11-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: netpipe Version: 3.7.2-9 Severity: serious Hi, Your package (build-)depends on libopenmpi-dev on 32-bit architectures, where openmpi is no longer available. In order to solve this, your package should build-depend on mpi-default-dev instead to build against the default mpi implementation,

Bug#1078743: vtk9: BD-Uninstallable on 32-bit architectures after #1068320

2024-11-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 patch On 20/11/2024 14:32, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 09:05:38 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, Thanks for the explanation. On 01-11-2024 22:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > In this particular case, src:hdf5 [1] no longer provides the binary pack

Bug#1076468: arpack: FTBFS with mpich as default provider on 32 bit architectures

2024-11-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
h now +build against MPICH. Closes: #1076468. + + -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:36:36 +0100 + arpack (3.9.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru arpack-3.9.1/debian/libparpack2t64.symbols arpack-3.9.1/debian/libparpack2t64.symbols --- arpack-

Bug#1078743: vtk9: BD-Uninstallable on 32-bit architectures after #1068320

2024-11-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 09:05:38 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, Thanks for the explanation. On 01-11-2024 22:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > In this particular case, src:hdf5 [1] no longer provides the binary package > libhdf5-openmpi-dev for any 32-bit architecture since version 1.10.10+repac

Bug#1086489: xsimd: autopkgtest is failing on arm64

2024-11-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:12:31 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: severity -1 serious On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 09:49:29 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Source: xsimd > Version: 13.0.0-1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > Maybe caused by the

Bug#1087319: starpu-contrib: rebuild against libomp5-19

2024-11-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: starpu-contrib Version: 1.3.10+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package builds against the default llvm version, but can't be binNMUd. Please rebuild it for the ongong llvm transition to llvm 19. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1086937: pfstools: build against imagemagick 7

2024-11-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 09/11/2024 17:51, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2024-11-07 po...@debian.org wrote: Source: pfstools Severity: serious Hi, pfstools is still built against imagemagick 6, but we're transitioning to imagemagick 7, see [1]. Your package may be build-depending on imagemagick 6 binaries (e.g.

Bug#1086934: kxstitch: build against imagemagick 7

2024-11-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 07/11/2024 16:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi, On 07/11/2024 14:00, Aurélien COUDERC wrote: control: tags -1 + moreinfo Dear Emilio, Le jeudi 7 novembre 2024, 12:29:12 UTC+1 po...@debian.org a écrit : Source: kxstitch Severity: serious Hi, kxstitch is

Bug#1086934: kxstitch: build against imagemagick 7

2024-11-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi, On 07/11/2024 14:00, Aurélien COUDERC wrote: control: tags -1 + moreinfo Dear Emilio, Le jeudi 7 novembre 2024, 12:29:12 UTC+1 po...@debian.org a écrit : Source: kxstitch Severity: serious Hi, kxstitch is still built against imagemagick 6, but we're transiti

Bug#1085354: Upstream patch available

2024-11-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Andrea, On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:02:06 +0200 marillat wrote: Hi, Upstream patch: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/15479/commits/a41747ac8e824b5cb9ed6874a688a4d5a578e10c This is blocking the mbedtls transition. Can you take a look at the patch? Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1086748: easyeffects: FTBFS on armel: error: static assertion failed: static_assert(std::atomic::is_always_lock_free)

2024-11-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: easyeffects Version: 7.1.9-1 Severity: serious Your package failed to build on armel: c++ -Isrc/easyeffects.p -Isrc -I../src -I../include -I. -I.. -Idata -fdiagnostics-color=always -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS=1 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wextra -std=c++20 -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused

Bug#1086555: rakudo: FTBFS on arm: build hangs sometimes

2024-11-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: rakudo Version: 2024.09-2 Severity: serious Hi, rakudo has recently started to hang while building on armhf and arm64, see: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rakudo&arch=arm64&ver=2024.09-1&stamp=1728240588&raw=0 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rakudo&ar

Bug#1086226: rdkit: autopkgtests fail

2024-10-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: rdkit Version: 202209.3-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your autopkgtests are failing, preventing migration to testing. This is an excerpt from the log: 97s autopkgtest [04:13:35]: test installcheck: [--- 98s ### PostgreSQL 17 installcheck ### 98s Creating new PostgreSQL c

Bug#1085192: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#1085192: phoc: build-depends on missing: libwlroots-dev:loong64 (>= 0.17.0)

2024-10-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:12:18 +0200 Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= wrote: Hi, thanks for looking into this. On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 02:50:15PM +0800, zhangdandan wrote: > 3. Solution > Please take care of the d/control file in phoc packages. > ``` >  libwlroots-dev (>= 0.17.0), >  libwlr

Bug#1075559: telepathy-logger: diff for NMU version 0.8.2-4.1

2024-10-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 11/10/2024 21:15, Boyuan Yang wrote: Control: tags -1 +patch +pending X-Debbugs-CC: sjo...@debian.org po...@debian.org bi...@debian.org Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for telepathy-logger (versioned as 0.8.2-4.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should

Bug#1085245: Please give back fuzzel on mips64el

2024-10-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 21/10/2024 15:24, Peter Colberg wrote: Hi, The build of fuzzel on some non-x86 archs failed due to false-positive errors [1] by gcc-14_14.2.0-3, e.g., on mips64el. I would like to retry the build to see if the errors are reproducible using gcc-14_14.2.0-7. gb fuzzel_1.11.1+ds-1 . mips64el

Bug#1080515: ddcutil: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: passing argument 2 of 'str_to_long' from incompatible pointer type

2024-09-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: ddcutil Version: 1.4.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Your package failed to build on armel and armhf: dsa2.c: In function 'dsa2_adjust_for_rcnt_successes': dsa2.c:782:63: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 4 has type 'time_t' {aka 'long long int'} [

Bug#1080514: knot: FTBFS on armel: insufficient atomics

2024-09-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: knot Version: 3.2.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi, Your package failed to build on armel: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -include ../src/config.h -DCONFIG_DIR=\"/etc/knot\" -DSTORAGE_DIR=\"/var/lib/knot\" -DRUN_DIR=\"/run/knot\" -DMODULE_DIR=\"/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnuea

Bug#1079078: gambas3: FTBFS on armel: /usr/include/poppler/goo/GooString.h:241:24: error: no member named 'starts_with' in 'std::basic_string'

2024-08-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:11:26 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Source: gambas3 Version: 3.19.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gambas3&

Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue

2024-08-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/08/2024 11:13, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, [Disclaimer: I'm not the most experienced person on transitions in the team, so I'd like for Graham, Emilio and/or Sebastian to check if they agree with me.] Thanks for working on this. On 17-08-2024 05:58, Aron Xu wrote: After some research, I pr

Bug#1078199: openjdk-24: keep out of testing

2024-08-08 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: openjdk-24 Version: 24~8ea-1 Severity: serious openjdk-24 is a non-LTS release, and we won't ship with it. It can stay in unstable and may be useful to bootstrap newer OpenJDK releases, but it shouldn't migrate to testing. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1078198: openjdk-23: keep out of testing

2024-08-08 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: openjdk-23 Version: 23~34ea-1 Severity: serious openjdk-23 is a non-LTS release, and we won't ship with it. It can stay in unstable and may be useful to bootstrap newer OpenJDK releases, but it shouldn't migrate to testing. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1061212: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-18

2024-07-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 21:56:39 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: That version was the last to build on llvm-toolchain-17. Now that llvm-toolchain-18 is asked for, it should be a different one. I have update the git master to 3.1.61 but that fails to build currently and would appreciate someone to mak

Bug#1072971: kuserfeedback: FTBFS on s390x: OpenGLInfoSourceTest::testOpenGLInfoSource() '!m.value(QLatin1String("vendor")).toString().isEmpty()' returned FALSE

2024-06-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: reassign -1 mesa 24.1.1-2 Control: affects -1 kuserfeedback Control: retitle -1 mesa: fails to initialize OpenGL on s390x: Unexpected format PIPE_FORMAT_X8B8G8R8_SRGB in st_new_renderbuffer_fb On 11/06/2024 09:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Source: kuserfeedback Version: 1.3.0-3

Bug#1052660: gst-plugins-bad1.0: Fails to build: netsim build test failing

2024-06-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: severity -1 important On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:52:57 -0400 Jeremy Bicha wrote: Source: gst-plugins-bad1.0 Version: 1.22.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs trixie sid Forwarded: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/issues/3000 gst-plugins-bad1.0's elements_netsim build te

Bug#1072971: kuserfeedback: FTBFS on s390x: OpenGLInfoSourceTest::testOpenGLInfoSource() '!m.value(QLatin1String("vendor")).toString().isEmpty()' returned FALSE

2024-06-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: kuserfeedback Version: 1.3.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, During a rebuild for the Qt6 transition, your package failed to build on s390x: * Start testing of OpenGLInfoSourceTest * Config: Using QtTest library 5.15.13, Qt 5.15.13 (s390x-big_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic)

Bug#1059249: fixed in qt6-base 6.6.2+dfsg-4

2024-06-07 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: reassign -1 qt6-base Control: fixed -1 6.6.2+dfsg-4 Control: affects -1 designer-qt6 On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:52:12 + Debian FTP Masters wrote: Source: qt6-base Source-Version: 6.6.2+dfsg-4 Done: Patrick Franz qt6-base (6.6.2+dfsg-4) experimental; urgency=medium . [ Patrick F

Bug#1069679: Debian Bugs information: logs for Bug#1069679

2024-05-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Mike, On 24/05/2024 09:39, Hector Oron wrote: Hello Mike, On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 08:57, Mike Gabriel wrote: If noone plans to fix Ofono in Debian within the next 1-2 weeks, I'd like to do a team upload. In that case, could any of you give me access to https://salsa.debian.org/telepathy-te

Bug#1071620: libchicken-dev: depends on obsolete libpcre3-dev package

2024-05-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: libchicken-dev Version: 5.3.0-1.1 Severity: serious Hi, pcre3 is being removed. libchicken-dev depends on libpcre3-dev, however it looks like that dependency is unused. The headers don't mention it and pcre3 support was removed in version 4.8.0.5-1 (bug #729144). Looks like libpcre3-dev

Bug#1071618: kannel-dev: depends on obsolete libpcre3-dev

2024-05-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: kannel-dev Version: 1.4.5-16 Severity: serious Hi, kannel-dev depends on libpcre3-dev, which is going to be removed. Given pcre3 support was removed in 1.4.5-13, that dependency can probably just go away. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1071476: neochat: Neochat will not start, due to old kirigami-addons

2024-05-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Mon, 20 May 2024 01:04:01 +0200 "Salvo \"LtWorf\" Tomaselli" wrote: Package: neochat Version: 23.08.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: ltw...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, neochat won't start. I have uploaded kirigami-addons, and made a new upload of ne

Bug#1071147: bluez: autopkgtests fail due to lack of devices

2024-05-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: bluez Version: 5.73-1 Severity: serious Hi, The new autopkgtests added in 5.73-1 are failing on ci.debian.net: autopkgtest [03:11:41]: test bluez-response: [--- testAdapter (__main__.TestBluezResponse.testAdapter) ... Can't open HCI socket.: Address family not sup

Bug#1071145: lxqt-menu-data: breaks lxqt-panel

2024-05-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: lxqt-menu-data Version: 1.4.1-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package breaks/replaces lxqt-panel (<< 1.4), however the latest lxqt-panel in sid is 1.3.0-1. This means that those packages cannot be co-installed atm, which is making lxqt-core uninstallable now. If the reason for this breaks/

Bug#1069536: glib-d: FTBFS on armel: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: dh-dlang (>= 0.6.2), gir-to-d (>= 0.23.2)

2024-05-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: found -1 2.4.3-1 Hi, On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:22:43 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: glib-d Version: 2.4.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armel Hi, During a rebuild of all packag

Bug#1071110: libjson-glib-dev: ships installed tests, causing b-d cycles

2024-05-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: libjson-glib-dev Version: 1.8.0-2 Severity: serious Hi, libjson-glib-dev ships tests in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/installed-tests/, which makes the package get a dependency on libglib2.0-0t64 through shlibs:Depends. That in turn causes b-d cycles, e.g. for fcitx-kkc on arm{el,hf}: fcitx

Bug#1070447: sdpa: dependency generation does not account for t64 changes

2024-05-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Sun, 5 May 2024 15:35:40 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Source: sdpa Version: 7.3.16+dfsg-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org Dependencies on libmumps-seq are produced using ${mumps-seq:Version} which does not include the changes from the t64 transition. Please adopt the

Bug#1065281: evolution-data-server: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependnecy for time_t transition

2024-05-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: notfound -1 3.51.2-1 Control: found -1 3.50.3-2 Control: fixed -1 3.50.3-2.1 On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 11:53:00 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Source: evolution-data-server Version: 3.51.2-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org, vor...@debian.org Thank you for uploading the

Bug#1069254: nwipe: FTBFS: configure: error: libconfig library not found

2024-05-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:56:55 +0200 "M. van Brummelen" wrote: Hi, On 2024-04-29 10:28, Bo YU wrote: > Tags: patch > > hi, > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:00:30PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >> >> checking for libconfig... no >> checking for main in -llibconfig... no >> configure: error: li

Bug#1066831: tagging 1066831

2024-05-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Wouter, On Wed, 03 Apr 2024 14:17:38 +0200 Wouter Verhelst wrote: tags 1066831 + upstream fixed-upstream pending thanks Can we have a fix for this in sid? That would help with some ongoing transitions, and probably with some installability issues on arm* on testing. Thanks, Emilio

Bug#1060407: gtkwave update for {bookworm,bullseye,buster}-security

2024-04-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 29/03/2024 00:06, Adrian Bunk wrote: Hi, attached are proposed debdiffs for updating gtkwave to 3.3.118 in {bookworm,bullseye,buster}-security for review for a DSA (and as preview for buster). General notes: As suggested by the security team in #1060407, this is a backport of a new upstream

Bug#1063446: libmozjs-115-dev: cannot call JS::CanonicalizeNaN(double) on mips64el

2024-02-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Simon, On 08/02/2024 21:59, Simon McVittie wrote: On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 at 10:37:33 +, Simon McVittie wrote: Package: libmozjs-115-dev Justification: makes gjs FTBFS (#1063433) I believe mozjs115_115.7.0-3 should fix this. wb-team: Please could someone with wanna-build access schedule g

Bug#1013872: salt: CVE-2022-22967

2023-03-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 08:13:07 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 13:55:24 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: salt > The following vulnerability was published for salt. > > CVE-2022-22967[0]: > | An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt in versions before 3002.9, > |

Bug#1029845: harfbuzz: non-distributable font included in source

2023-02-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 01/02/2023 09:47, Andres Salomon wrote: Hi Security Team & Jeremy, I had originally planned to ask the release team about fixing #1029845 (the bug below) in bullseye via t-p-u. However, it would appear that there's also an outstanding security bug in harfbuzz (CVE-2022-33068, tracked at #10

Bug#1026116: Patches not applied in security release deb10u6, FTBFS

2022-12-16 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/12/2022 20:38, Mihai Moldovan wrote: [Resent to the bug tracker as well] * On 12/15/22 19:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: I'm not sure I understand what the problem is. The patches are in debian/patches/ and are applied during build using quilt. Oh this is about the xorg-s

Bug#1026116: Patches not applied in security release deb10u6, FTBFS

2022-12-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/12/2022 18:42, Sven Joachim wrote: Control: forcemerge 989852 -1 Am 15.12.2022 um 01:16 schrieb Mihai Moldovan: Package: xorg-server-source Version: 2:1.20.4-1+deb10u6 Severity: normal Hi It looks like the content of debian/patches/ has not been applied when packaging xorg-server-sour

Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/10/2022 08:27, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: firefox-esr Version: 102.3.0esr-1 Severity: serious Tags: bookworm sid X-Debbugs-Cc: Carsten Schoenert , debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org [ various potentially interested parties are Cc'ed ]

Bug#981422: xdg-utils: autopkgtest failure: make: dh: No such file or directory

2021-03-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/01/2021 22:22, Nicholas Guriev wrote: Hello! On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 21:54 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: You recently added an autopkgtest to your package xdg-utils, great. However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can you please investigate the situati

Bug#969537: elpa-pdf-tools-server: broken when compiled against libpoppler102

2020-09-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Fri, 04 Sep 2020 12:49:06 -0300 David Bremner wrote: > David Bremner writes: > > > Package: elpa-pdf-tools-server > > Version: 0.90-3+b2 > > Here's a backtrace > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x77e5951e in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler

Bug#968395: Stretch update of {{ package }}?

2020-08-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: terminator Severity: grave Tags: security Dear maintainer(s), The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Stretch version of {{ package }}: {%- if cve -%} {% for entry in cve %} https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/{{ entry }} {%- endf

Bug#954855: php7.4-enchant: Please switch from enchant(1) to enchant-2

2020-07-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:42:32 -0400 Boyuan Yang wrote: > Package: php7.4-enchant > Severity: important > Version: 7.4.3-4 > X-Debbugs-CC: ond...@debian.org kap...@debian.org > > Dear Debian PHP Maintainers, > > I noticed that both php7.3 and php7.4 are providing modules that make use of > the lib

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >