Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022321 in node-nouislider reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-nouislider/-/commit/e721d77d1de4f183
Package: normaliz
Version: 3.8.3+ds-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I am getting the following error message when running normaliz:
$ normaliz
normaliz: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libeanticxx.so.0: version
`LIBEANTICXX_0_1_2' not found (required by norm
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 3:33 PM Doug Torrance wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 9:12 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > In file included from wmauda.c:29:
> > > /usr/include/audacious/dbus.h:23:10: fatal error: dbus/dbus-glib.h: No
> > > such file or di
Control: tags -1 pending
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 9:12 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > In file included from wmauda.c:29:
> > /usr/include/audacious/dbus.h:23:10: fatal error: dbus/dbus-glib.h: No such
> > file or directory
> >23 | #include
> > | ^~
> > compilation
Control: reassign -1 texlive-latex-extra
Control: merge 921297 -1
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 8:21 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ! LaTeX Error: File `listofitems.sty' not found.
Thanks for the report! This bug was previously reported in #921300,
which was merged with #921297.
This bug still persists in wmcalc 0.6, although a fix has been submitted
upstream [1].
[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/wmaker-dev/4uEVw8bm-cU
On 08/22/2018 11:35 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Source: fflas-ffpack
Version: 2.3.2-1~exp3
Severity: serious
SSE is not part of the i386 baseline.
Thanks for your report!
Is it documented anywhere which instruction sets are part of which
architectures' baselines?
We could of course disable all
"cat testsuite/0602ResultantFanProjection/outputNew"
E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
Thanks!
Doug Torrance
On 07/18/2018 01:16 PM, Juhani Numminen wrote:
On Fri, 04 May 2018 12:22:31 + Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:linbox
Version: 1.4.2-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid buster
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-8
../../linbox/matrix/densematrix/blas-transposed-matrix.h:74:8
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/issues/155
On 06/30/2018 09:03 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: fflas-ffpack
> Version: 2.3.2-1~exp1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fflas-ffpack&suite=sid
>
> ...
> Checking Mo
On 04/05/2018 08:24 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: fflas-ffpack
Version: 2.3.2-1~exp1
Severity: serious
Hi,
noticed this while rebuilding linbox/experimental in sid+experimental:
...
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
check
On 03/08/2017 09:12 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m23.2s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libWMaker.so -> libWMaker.so.1.0.1
Th
Control: severity -1 important
With wmbiff version 0.4.30-2, just uploaded to sid, the offending test
(test_wmbiff) is now skipped on big endian archs like s390x. Therefore,
the package now builds on these archs.
The underlying problem still exists, but I am reducing the severity to
importa
On 12/02/2016 12:58 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:44:05AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
On 12/02/2016 09:26 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to
test such problems.
Yeah, I've used porterboxes in the past.
On 12/02/2016 09:26 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:37:23AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
Thanks for your reply!
I've changed all the shorts to uint16_t's -- hopefully this works!
You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to
test suc
On 11/24/2016 08:25 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:46:27PM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
Error connecting: Invalid argument
connect(0.0.3.255:-7907) failed: Invalid argument
I would start here. The IP/port information is converted incorrectly.
I assume it's this fun
Yes, please do.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016, 1:52 PM Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 06:01 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> > On 11/29/2016 03:53 PM, Doug Torrance wrote:
> >> Control: reassign -1 src:givaro
> >>
> >> On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>
Control: reassign -1 src:givaro
On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal
instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu
extensions that are not allowed.
Jerome figured out in [1] that the problem happens whe
Hello!
I am copying the RC bug below to the s390 mailing list. I am stumped as
to what is going on. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank you!
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:30:55 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: wmbiff
> Version: 0.4.29-1
> Severity: serious
>
>
https://buildd.debian.org/sta
On 08/28/2016 04:48 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
> ...
>
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-fflas-ffpack-dummy : Depends: libgivaro-dev (< 4.0.2)
but 4.0.2-1 is to be installed
T
Control: tags -1 pending
On 08/09/2016 07:53 AM, Ximin Luo wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
I was recommended by multiple people to bump the severity of this bug. Also to clarify that i386
should have no optimisation flags, and not "-msse -msse2". My earlier comment was based
on a misunder
On 07/18/2016 01:53 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
On 17/07/2016 19:54, Doug Torrance wrote:
I see that you've recently pushed some changes to git which close the RC
bug #811847 [1]. Were you planning on uploading them? I ask because
givaro is currently scheduled for auto-removal from testing.
Hi Julien,
I see that you've recently pushed some changes to git which close the RC
bug #811847 [1]. Were you planning on uploading them? I ask because
givaro is currently scheduled for auto-removal from testing. I'm also
interested in givaro as it is a dependency for Macaulay2, which I'm
Control: tags -1 pending
On 07/14/2016 04:06 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: mathic
Version: 1.0~git20160320-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160713 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS with GCC 6 on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packag
Control: tags -1 pending
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:08:29 -0800 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released
> yet, but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for
> stretch.
This was fixed in Gentoo [1]. I have converted their pat
Control: tags -1 forwarded wmaker-...@lists.windowmaker.org
libtool 2.4.4 will add a --with-aix-soname option. Ignore it when checking
whether INSTALL-WMAKER is up to date.
Fixes Debian bug #814213 [1]. Proposed fix to Debian package at [2].
From: Chris Lamb
Subject: wmaker: FTBFS: Erro
Control: tags -1 pending
On 02/09/2016 05:57 AM, Doug Torrance wrote:
> On 02/09/2016 03:59 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> Source: wmaker
>> Version: 0.95.7-3
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: fails to build from source
>> User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.d
On 02/09/2016 03:59 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Source: wmaker
> Version: 0.95.7-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs
> X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>
Control: tags -1 pending
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 17:35:06 +0200 ni...@thykier.net wrote:
> The package wmpinboard is using a debhelper compat level of 3 or less
> according to lintian. These compat levels have been deprecated for
> the past ~10 years and debhelper will remove support for them in the n
On 01/19/2016 02:41 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
We can choose one of these hacks:
1 Find a way to ship unpatched libwraster 0.95.7 in Debian.
2a Patch the source to fix back the symbol versioning to
LIBWRASTER3
2b Patch the source to use a different soname. (If the ABI breaks in
an incompatible
Control: tags -1 pending
On 01/18/2016 02:55 PM, Doug Torrance wrote:
> I think the solution is to rename libwraster5 to something like
> libwraster5v2 and trigger an auto transition.
I've pushed these changes to git. Note that the new library already
means we'll have to wait f
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:58:13 +0100 Julien Puydt
wrote:
> upgrading libwraster5 broke wdm with the above error message.
As Andreas noted in his forwarding message to the dev mailing list [1],
this is due to a change made upstream between versions 0.95.6 and 0.95.7
which changed the version from LI
Control: tags -1 pending
On Sun, 06 Sep 2015 16:14:17 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote:
> The wmacpi package FTBFS when rebuild against libdockapp3.
>
> """
> gcc -MM -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
-Werror=format-security -O2 -Wall -W -g -ansi wmacpi.c > wmacpi.d
> gcc -g -O2 -fstack-protector
ou provide some more information?
In particular, could you run "upower --monitor-detail" from the command
line? It should periodically print out a status report with information
about your battery. If it doesn't, then this is likely an issue with
upower. (Note that wmbattery switched to using upower in 2.42, right
after the version that was in wheezy.)
Thanks!
Doug Torrance
/libdockapp.
Therefore, its reverse dependencies, including wmdate, should take this into
account when building.
I have attached a patch which fixes this issue.
Thanks!
Doug Torrance
P.S. If you are interested, you might consider developing wmdate as a member
of the Debian Window Maker Team [1].
[1
On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 15:45:31 -0400 Doug Torrance
wrote:
> P.S. If you are interested, you might consider developing wmail as a
member
> of the Debian Window Maker Team [1].
>
> [1]
My apologies, I neglected to paste the URL:
https://pkg-wmaker.alioth.debian.org/
, its reverse dependencies, including wmail, should take this into
account when building.
I have attached a patch which fixes this issue.
Thanks!
Doug Torrance
P.S. If you are interested, you might consider developing wmail as a member
of the Debian Window Maker Team [1].
[1]
diff -rupN wmail
- Add Breaks/Replaces for libwraster3-dev; remove Provides for
+ libwraster-dev (Closes: #784711).
+
+ -- Doug Torrance Thu, 21 May 2015 13:34:40 -0500
+
wmaker (0.95.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version 0.95.6. [Closes: #148856]
diff -Nru wmaker-0.95.6/debian/control w
3-dev in Build-Depends to libwraster-dev
+ (Closes: #784702).
+
+ -- Doug Torrance Tue, 19 May 2015 18:55:55 -0500
+
wmweather+ (2.15-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
diff -Nru wmweather+-2.15/debian/control wmweather+-2.15/debian/control
--- wmweather+-2.15/debian/co
Package: wmweather+
Version: 2.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 4.2
Beginning with wmaker version 0.95.6-1, libwraster3-dev has been renamed to
libwraster-dev. As this is a build dependency of wdm, debian/control should
be updated accordingly.
diff --git a/debian/control b
Package: wdm
Version: 1.28-17
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Beginning with wmaker version 0.95.6-1, libwraster3-dev has been renamed to
libwraster-dev. As this is a build dependency of wdm, debian/control should
be updated accordingly.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 2342db0..3
41 matches
Mail list logo
